This study uses event time methodology to test the reaction of the stock market to announcements of the appointments of 367 key executive officers in a sample of 1986 Fortune 500 companies. We found significant, positive market reactions for the total top management sample. In addition, we found differences for successor's origin, position, and age at the time of appointment. The results highlight the importance of specifying the conditions under which succession will have its different effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, M.P., Panian, S.K., & Lotz, R.E.1979. Managerial succession and organizational performance: A recalcitrant problem revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 167-180.
2.
Ball, R., & Brown, P.1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn: 159-178.
3.
Beatty, R.PR, & Zajac, E.J.1987. CEO change and firm performance in large corporations: Succession effects and manager effects. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 305-317.
4.
Bettis, R.A.1983. Modem financial theory, corporate strategy, and public policy: Three countdowns. Academy of Management Review, 9: 152-157.
5.
Brown, M.C.1982. Administrative succession and organizational performance: The succession effect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 1-16.
6.
Carlsson, G., & Karlsson, K.1970. Age, cohorts and the generation of generations. American Sociological Review, 35: 710-718.
7.
Carroll, G.R.1984. Dynamics of publisher succession in newspaper organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 93-113.
8.
Chandler, A.D.1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Child, J.1974. Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 11: 13-27.
10.
Chung, K.H., Lubatkin, M., Rogers, R.C., & Owers, J.E.1987. Do insiders make better CEOs than outsiders?Academy of Management Executive, 1: 323-329.
11.
Coughlan, A.T, & Schmidt, R.M.1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7: 43-66.
12.
Cragg, P B., & King, M.1988. Organizational characteristics and small firms' performance revisited. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13: 49-62.
13.
Dalton, D.R., & Kesner, I.E1985. Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 749-762.
14.
Day, D.V, & Lord, R.G.1988. Executive leadership and organizational performance: Suggestions for a new theory and methodology. Journal of Management, 14: 453-464.
15.
Dodd, P., & Warner, J.1983. On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests. Journal of Financial Economics, 11: 401-438.
16.
Dyer, L.1983. Bringing human resources into the strategy formulation process. Human Resource Management, 22: 257-271.
Furtado, E.PR, & Rozeff, M.S.1987. The wealth effects of company initiated management changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 18: 147-160.
19.
Gamson, WA., & Scotch, N.A.1964. Scapegoating in Baseball. American Journal of Sociology, 70: 69-72.
20.
Gephart, R.P.1978. Status degradition and organizational succession: An ethomethodological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 553-581.
21.
Gouldner, A.W1954. Patterns of individual bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
22.
Grusky, O.1961. Corporate size, bureaucratization, and managerial succession. American Journal of Sociology, 67: 261-269.
23.
Grusky, O.1964. Reply to scrapegoating in baseball. American Journal of Sociology, 70: 72-76.
24.
Guasch, J.L., & Weiss, A.1981. Self-selection in the labor market. American Economic Review, 71: 275-284.
25.
Guest, R.H.1962. Managerial succession in complex organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 68: 47-54.
26.
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, PA.1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193-206.
27.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J.1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929-964.
28.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J.1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149-164.
29.
Harrison, J.R., Torres, D.L., & Kukalis, S.1988. The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 211-232.
30.
Hart, P., & Mellons, J.1970. Management youth and company growth: A correlation?Management Decision, 4: 50-53.
31.
Helmich, D.L.1974. Organizational growth and succession patterns. Academy of Management Journal, 17: 771-775.
32.
Helmich, D.L., & Brown, W B.1972. Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 371-381.
33.
Jemison, D. B.1981. The importance of an integrative approach to strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 6: 601-608.
34.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W.1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-350.
35.
Jensen, M.C., & Ruback, R.S.1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11: 1-50.
36.
Jensen, M.C., & Zimmerman, J.L.1985. Management compensation and the managerial labor market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7: 3-9.
37.
Kimberly, J.R., & Evanisko, M.J.1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 689-713.
38.
Levinson, H.1980. Criteria for choosing chief executives. Harvard Business Review, (July/August): 113-120.
39.
Lieberson, S., & O'Connor, J.F1972. Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. American Sociological Review, 37: 117-130.
40.
Livingston, J.S.1971. Myth of the well-educated manager. Harvard Business Review, (January/ February): 79-89.
41.
Lubatkin, M., Chung, K., Rogers, R., & Owers, J.1989. Stockholder reactions to CEO changes in large organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 47-68.
42.
Lubatkin, M., & Shrieves, R.E.1986. Towards reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 11: 497-512.
43.
Mace, M.L.1971. Directions: Myth and reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
44.
Mintzberg, H.1983. Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45.
Oviatt, B.M.1988. Agency and transaction cost and perspectives on the manager-shareholder relationship: Incentives for congruent interests. Academy of Management Review, 13: 214-225.
46.
Peavy, J.W1984. Modern financial theory, corporate strategy, and public policy: Another perspective. Academy of Management Review, 9: 152-157.
47.
Peters, T.J., & Waterman, R.H.1982. In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
48.
Pfeffer, J.1977. The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2: 104-112.
49.
Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A.1986. Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 72-83.
50.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R.1977. Organizational context and the characteristics and tenure of hospital administrators. Academy of Management Journal, 20: 74-88.
51.
Rappaport, A.1981. Selecting strategies that create shareholder value. Harvard Business Review, (May/June): 139-149.
52.
Reinganum, M.R.1985. The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 46-60.
53.
Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, P.1971. Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.
54.
Ross, S.1973. The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. American Economic Review, 63: 134-139.
55.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J.1977. Constraints on administrative discretion: The limited influence of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12: 475-498.
56.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J.1980. Effects of ownership and performance and executive tenure in U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 653-664.
57.
Salop, J., & Salop, S.1976. Self-selection and turnover in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90: 619-628.
Schwartz, K.B., & Menon, K.1985. Executive succession in failing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 680-686.
60.
Schwert, G.W1983. Size and stock returns and other empirical regularities. Journal of Financial Economics, 12: 3-12.
61.
Scott, WR.1981. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
62.
Smith, M., & White, M.C.1987. Strategy, CEO specialization and succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 263-280.
63.
Stevens, J.M., Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M.1978. Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 380-396.
64.
Stodgill, R.M.1974. Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
65.
Thomas, A.B.1988. Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance?Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 388-400.
66.
Trow, D. B.1961. Executive succession in small companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6: 228-239.
67.
Wagner, W G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C.A.1984. Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 74-92.
68.
Wall Street Journal. 1989. Building steam: Union Pacific changes its hidebound ways under new chairman. January 18: 1-1,10-10.
69.
Warner, J.B., Watts, R.L., & Wruck, K.H.1988. Stock prices and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 461-492.
70.
Weiner, N., & Mahoney, T.A.1981. A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 453-470.
71.
Worrell, D.L., & Davidson, WN.1987. The effect of CEO succession on stockholder wealth in large firms following the death of the predecessor. Journal of Management, 13: 509-515.
72.
Zajac, E.J.1989. CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Discussion paper No. 20, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.
