This study examines the outcomes of business-level product research and development intensity and their impact on return on investment under two business strategies: differentiation and cost leadership. Three different types of outcomes from product R&D spending are proposed: accounting, disruptive, and investment outcomes. These are described and are found to differ by strategy. In a cost leadership strategy, stronger disruptive and investment outcomes were found than in a differentiation strategy. The differentiation strategy, by comparison, had longer investment outcomes and greater stability of product R&D. Nevertheless, the investment outcomes were ephemeral for both strategies.
Ansoff, H.I., & Stewart, J.M.1967. Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Business Review, 45(6): 71-83.
6.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G.1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88 (3):588-606.
7.
Boston Consulting Group. 1972. Perspectives on experience. Boston: Author.
8.
Branch, B.1974. Research and development activity and profitability: A distributed lag analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 999-1011.
9.
Chamberlain, N.W1968. Enterprise and environment: The firm in time and place. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Dean, R.C.1974. The temporal mismatch: Innovation's pace vs. management's time horizon. Research Management, 17(3): 12-15.
12.
Elliott, J.W1971. Funds flow vs. expectational theories of research and development expenditures in the firm. Southern Economic Journal, 37: 409-422.
13.
Ellis, L.W1984. The financial side of industrial research management. New York: Wiley.
14.
Grabowski, H.G.1968. The determinants of industrial research and development: A study of the chemical, drug and petroleum industries. Journal of Political Economy, 76: 292-306.
15.
Grandstrand, O.1982. Technology, management, and markets: An investigation of R&D and innovation in industrial organizations. New York: St. Martin's Press.
16.
Hall, WK.1982. Survival strategies in a hostile environment. The McKinsey Quarterly, Winter: 2-22.
17.
Hambrick, D.C.1984. Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Management, 10(1): 27-41.
18.
Hambrick, D.C., MacMillan, I.C., & Barbosa, R.R.1983. Business unit strategy and changes in the product R&D budget. Management Science, 29 (7): 757-769.
19.
Hambrick, D.C., MacMillan, I.C., & Day, D.L.1982. Strategic attributes and performance in the BCG matrix-A PIMS based analysis of industrial product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3): 510-531.
20.
Harrigan, K.R.1985. An application of clustering for strategic group analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 55-73.
21.
Hayes, R. H., & Abernathy, WJ.1980. Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, 58(4): 67-77.
22.
Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D.1983. LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by of maximum likelihood and least squares methods -VERSIONS V and VI. Chicago: International Educational Services.
23.
Kessler, R.C., & Greenberg, D.F.1981. Linear panel analysis: Models of quantitative change. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Long, J.S.1983. Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V.1987. Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13(1): 109-122.
34.
Ward, J.1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58: 236-244.
