Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1990-09
A Contingency Approach to Appraisal Satisfaction: An Initial Investigation of the Joint Effects of Organizational Variables and Appraisal Characteristics
The present study explored the moderating effects of organizational variables on the appraisal characteristic-appraisal satisfaction relationship. Analyses indicated that the appraisal characteristics of action plans, frequency, and rater training were more positively related to appraisal satisfaction when subordinates experienced role conflict, were not closely monitored, and supervisors had a large span of control. The results provide substantial support for conceptualizing appraisal satisfaction as a contingent function of both appraisal characteristics and organizational variables. Implications of the findings for the design of appraisal systems, appraisal effectiveness, andfuture research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashford, S.J.1986. The role of feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 465-487.
2.
Ashford, S.J., & Cummings, L.L.1983. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32: 370-398.
3.
Bannister, B.D.1986. Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recepient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 203-210.
4.
Bernardin, Hi., & Beatty, R.W1984. Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent.
5.
Brunswik, E.1952. The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Carroll, S.J., & Schneier, C.E.1982. Performance appraisals and review systems: The identification, measurement, and development of performance in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
7.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81-105.
8.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F.1981. Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Dansereau, E., Graen, G., & Haga, WJ.1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 46-78.
11.
Dipboye, R.L. & dePontbriand, R.1981. Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 248-251.
12.
Dobbins, G.H., Lane, I.M., & Steiner, D.D.1988. A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioral research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9: 281-286.
13.
Earley, P.C.1988. Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41: 50-64.
14.
Evans, M.1985. A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36: 305-323.
15.
Fiedler, E E.1967. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Graen, G.1976. Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 1201-1245. Chicago: Rand McNally.
17.
Graen, G., Novak, M., & Sommerkamp, P.1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 109-131.
18.
Herold, D.M., Liden, R.C., & Leatherwood, M.L.1987. Using multiple attributes to assess sources of performance feedback. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 826-835.
19.
Herold, D. M., & Parsons, C. K.1985. Assessing the feedback environment in work organizations: Development of the job feedback survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 290-305.
20.
House, R.J., & Rizzo, J.R.1972. Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7: 467-505.
21.
Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., & Taylor, M.S.1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 349-371.
22.
Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E.1979. Performance appraisal effectiveness: Its assessment and determinants. In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior: 425-478. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
Keeley, M.1978. A contingency framework for performance evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 3: 428-438.
24.
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J.M.1978. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22: 375-413.
25.
Landy, EJ., Barnes, J.L., & Murphy, K.R.1978. Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 751-754.
26.
Lawler, E.E.1967. The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51: 369-381.
27.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.1967. Organization and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Locke, E.1986. Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
29.
Mook, D.1983. In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38: 379-387.
30.
Mossholder, K.W, Bedeian, A.G., & Armenakis, A.A.1981. Role perceptions, satisfaction, and performance: Moderating effects of self-esteem and organizational level. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28: 231-343.
31.
Pearce, J. L., & Porter, L. W.1986. Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 211-218.
32.
Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., & Lirtzman, S.E.1970. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15: 150-163.
33.
Russell, J.S., & Goode, D.L.1988. An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 63-67.
34.
Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W.1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
35.
Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M., & Hulin, C.L.1969. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
36.
Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G.1988. The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Worchel, S., & Brehm, J.M.1971. Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18: 294-304.
