Discussions have drawn attention to the relationship between strategy and structure for much of the last quarter century. Yet, no firm basis has emerged to settle the issue of causal direction or to affirm the relationship's effects on organizational performance. By adding a new dimension to the strategy-structure model, this article attempts to conceptually link long-term performance with (a) the presence of subunits having distinctive competence in strategic planning and (b) the coordination of these differentiated subunits into a discernable microstructure embedded within the overall organization. This new dimension is explored and developed by use of a case of the Pacific Coast seaport industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Army Corps of Engineers. 1980. Waterborne commerce, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2.
Bobbitt, H.R., & Ford, J.D.1980. Decision maker choice as a determinant of organization structure, Academy of Management Review, 5, 13-24.
3.
Boschken, H.L.1988. Strategic design and organizational change: Pacific rim seaports in transition. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
4.
Bourgeois, III, L.J., & Astley, WG.1979. A strategic model of organizational conduct and performance, International Studies of Organization and Management, 9(3), 40-66.
5.
Bower, J.L.1970. Managing the resource allocation process, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Burgelman, R. A.1983. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8, 61-70.
7.
Bums, T. & Stalker, G.M.1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
8.
Chandler, A.D.1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Child, J.1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22.
10.
Cleland, D., & King, W R.1968. Systems analysis and project management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Emery, E E., & Trist, E. L.1965. The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32.
Fredrickson, J.W1986. The strategic decision process and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 11, 280-297.
14.
Fredrickson, J.W., & Mitchell, T.R.1984. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of ManagementJournal, 27, 399-423.
15.
Hedberg, B.L.T., Nystrom, P.C. & Starbuck, WI.1976. Camping on seesaws: Prescription for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 41-65.
16.
Horvarth, D., & McMillan, C.J.1979. Strategic choice and the structure of decision processes. International Studies of Management and Organization, 9(3), 87-112.
Levine, S., & White, RE.1961. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583-601.
21.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C.1978. Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Miles, R.H.1982. Coffin nails and corporate strategies. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
23.
Mintzburg, H.1978. Patterns in strategy formation, Management Science, 24, 934-948.
24.
Perrow, C.1970. Organizational analysis: A sociological view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25.
Rumelt, R.1974. Strategy, structure and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Selznick, P.1957. Leadership in administration. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.
27.
Thompson, J.D.1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Woodward, J.1965. Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.
