Evaluation of organizational development (OD) interventions, especially with regard to gamma change, is criticalfor both OD practitioners and researchers. Yet how to assess gamma change has not been adequately resolved. An 18-month field study of an OD intervention was used to explore empirically two alternative procedures for assessing gamma change-namely the methods of Golembiewski, Billingsley and Yeager (1976b) as compared to a modification of the methods of Terborg, Howard, and Maxwell (1980). Results suggest important differences between the methods and these differences are explored in detail.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, O.D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
2.
Armenakis, A.A. (1988). A review of research on the change typology. In R. Woodman & W Passmore (Eds.), Research in organization change and development (Vol. 2, pp. 163-194). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
Armenakis, A.A., Bedeian, A.G., & Pond, S. (1983). Research issues in OD evaluation: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 8, 320-328.
4.
Armenakis, A.A., & Zmud, R.W (1979). Interpreting the measurement of change in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 32, 709-724.
5.
Bedeian, A.G., Armenakis, A.A., & Randolph, WA. (1988). The significance of congruence coefficients: A comment and statistical test. Journal of Management, 14, 559-566.
6.
Bowers, D.G., & Hausser, D.L. (1977). Work group types and intervention effects in organizational development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 76-94.
7.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues offield settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
8.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1982). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Golembiewski, R.T. (1986). Contours in social change: Elemental graphics and a surrogate variable for gamma change. Academy of Management Review, 11, 550-566.
10.
Golembiewski, R.T., & Billingsley, K. (1980). Measuring change in OD panel designs: A response to critics. Academy of Management Review, 5, 97-104.
11.
Golembiewski, R.T., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976a). The congruence of factor analytic structures: Comparisons of four procedures and their solutions. Academy of Management Review, 1, 27-35.
12.
Golembiewski, R.T., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976b). Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 133-157.
13.
Green, G., & Wright, J. (1979). The retrospective approach to collecting baseline data. Social Research & Abstract, 15, 25-30.
14.
Guilford, J.P., & Fruchter, B. (1973). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Howard, G.S., & Dailey, P.R. (1979). Response shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 64, 144-150.
16.
Howard, G.S., Dailey, P., & Gulanick, N.A. (1979). The feasibility of informed pre test in attenuating response-shift bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 481-494.
17.
Howard, G.S., Ralph, K.M., Gulanick, N.A., Maxwell, S.E., Nance, D.W., & Gerber, S.R. (1979). Internal invalidity in pre test post test self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pre tests. Applied Psychological Measurements, 3, 1-23.
18.
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, E.L., & Jackson, G.B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulative researchfindings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Korth, B., & Tucker, L.R. (1975). The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simulated data. Psychometrika, 40, 361-372.
21.
Lindell, M.K., & Drexler, J.A., Jr. (1979). Issues in using survey methods for measuring organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 4, 13-19.
22.
Lindell, M.K., & Drexler, J.A., Jr. (1980). Equivocality of factor incongruence as an indicator of type of change in OD intervention. Academy of Management Review, 5, 105-107.
23.
Porras, J.I. (1979). The comparative impact of different OD techniques and intervention intensities. Journal of Applied Behavorial Science, 15, 156-178.
24.
Porras, J.I., & Berg, P.O. (1978a). Evaluation methodology in organizational development: An analysis and critique. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 14, 151-173.
25.
Porras, J.I., & Berg, PO. (1978b). The impact of organization development. Academy of Management Review, 3, 249-266.
26.
Randolph, WA. (1982). Planned organizational change and its measurement. Personnel Psychology, 35, 117-140.
27.
Rippey, R., Geller, L., & King, D. (1978). Retrospective pretending in the cognitive domain. Evaluation Quarterly, 2, 481-491.
28.
Sashkin, M., & Burke, WW (1987). Organization development in the 1980s. Journal of Management, 13, 393-417.
29.
Seashore, S.E., Lawler, E.E., Mirvis, P.H., & Cammann, C. (1983). Assessing organizational change. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
Schmitt, N. (1982). The use of analysis of covariance structures to assess beta and gamma change. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 343-358.
31.
Schmitt, N., Pulakos, E.D., & Lieblein, A. (1984). Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 249-260.
32.
Terborg, J.A., & Davis, G.A. (1982). Evaluation of a new method for assessing change to planned job redesign as applied to Hackman and Oldham's job characteristic model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 112-128.
33.
Terborg, J.A., Howard, G.S., & Maxwell, S.E. (1980). Evaluating planned organizational change: A method for assessing alpha, beta, and gamma change. Academy of Management Review, 5, 109-121.
34.
Van de Vliert, E., Huismans, S.E., & Stok, J.J.L. (1985). The criterion approach to unraveling beta and alpha change. Academy of Management Review, 10, 269-274.
35.
Vicars, W.M., & Hartke, D.D. (1984). Evaluating OD evaluations: A status report. Group & Organization Studies, 9, 177-188.
36.
Wortman, PM. (1983). Evaluation research: A methodological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 223-260.
