Subordinate reactions to feedback given in four different ways were assessed. Method one was unilateral, top-down feedback. Method two was supervisoryfeedback with subordinate participation in the discussion. Methods three and four involved a self-appraisal instrument completed prior to a participative performance discussion. In method three, the self-appraisal was not explicitly discussed, whereas in methodfour it was the heart of the discussion. All participative methods tended to result in more positive subordinate perceptions than the unilateral method, but no one particular participative technique was consistently superior. The appraisal methods had no differential impact on post-feedback performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bannister, B .D. (1986). Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 203-210.
2.
Bassett, G.A., & Meyer, H.H. (1968). Performance appraisal based on self-review. Personnel Psychology, 21, 421-430.
3.
Burke, R.J., Weitzel, W, & Weir, T. (1978). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 31, 903-919.
4.
Burke, R. J., & Wilcox, D. S. (1969). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews. Personnel Psychology, 22, 291-305.
5.
Catano, V.M. (1976). Improvement in workers' performance through feedback of information on systems performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 487-490.
6.
Cedarblom, D. (1982). The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications and suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 7219-227.
7.
Cummings, L.L. (1973). A field experimental study of the effects of two performance appraisal systems. Personnel Psychology, 26, 489-502.
8.
Dorfman, P.N., Stephan, WG., & Loveland, J. (1986). Performance appraisal behaviors: Superior perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39, 579-597.
9.
Dipboye, R.L., & dePontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reaction to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
10.
Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal-setting performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624-627.
11.
Farh, J.L., Werbel, J.D., & Bedeian, A.G. (1987, August). An empirical investigation of self-appraisal based performance evaluation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans.
12.
Gelbard, L.B., Lee, C., & Lupton, E. (1983). Self-appraisals: The next stage in performance evaluation. Supervisory Management, 28, 9-14.
13.
Greller, M.M. (1975). Subordinate participation and reactions to the appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 544-549.
14.
Greller, M. M. (1980). Evaluation of feedback sources as a function of role and organizational level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 24-27.
15.
Hillery, J.M., & Wexley, K.N. (1974). Participation effects in appraisal interviews conducted in a training situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 168-171.
16.
Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., & Taylor, S.M. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
17.
Kay, E., Meyer, H.H., & French, J.R.P. Jr. (1965). Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 311-317.
18.
Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J.P., Earley, C., & Lind, A. (1987). Information exchange in evaluation procedures: The effects of input and knowledge on performance and attitudes. Social Justice Review, 1, 235-249.
19.
Kim, J.S., & Hamner, WC. (1976). Effect of performance feedback and goal-setting on productivity and satisfaction in an organizational setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 48-57.
20.
Komaki, J., Barwick, K.D., & Scott, L.R. (1978). A behavioral safety approach to occupational safety: Pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 434-445.
21.
Landy, FJ., Barnes, J.L., & Murphy, K.R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
22.
Liden, R.C., & Mitchell, T.R. (1985). Reactions to feedback: The role of attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 291-308.
Lovrich, N.P. Jr., Hopkins, R.H., Shaffer, P.L. & Yale, D.A. (1981). Participative performance appraisal effects upon job satisfaction, agency climate, and work values: Results of a quasi-experimental study in six state agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1, 51-73.
Nemeroff, WE, & Wexley, K.N. (1979). An exploration of the relationship between performance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 25-34.
27.
Parker, J.W, Taylor, E.D., Barrett, R.S., & Martens, L. (1959). Rating scale content: III. Relationship between supervisory-and self-ratings. Personnel Psychology, 12, 49-63.
28.
Stone, D.L., Gueutal, H.G., & McIntosh, B. (1984). The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy. Personnel Psychology, 37, 487-506.
