Although there is much interest in the implementation of Japanese management techniques in the United States, it is not clear which aspects can be successfully adopted here. The present study examined the compensation decision-making policies of 41 Japanese and 63 United States managers. The results confi rmed past research regarding the importance that U.S. managers place upon job performance in their pay decisions and the importance that Japanese managers place upon other factors beyond performance (e.g., job worth) in their decisions. In addition, both groups gave the same amount of pay increase on the average; however, U.S. managers were much more willing to give large or small increases, whereas the Japanese managers had little variance in pay increases from employee to employee. Implications for managerial policy and practices of Japanese managers operating in the United States are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, N.J. (1986). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Boston: Kent.
2.
Ballon, R.J. (1970). Understanding the Japanese. Business Horizons, 13, 21-30.
3.
Bass, B.M., & Burger, P.C. (1979). Assessment of managers: An international comparison. New York: Free Press.
4.
Beatty, J.R. (1977). Identifying decision-making policies in the diagnosis of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 201-209.
5.
Beatty, J.R., Omens, A.E., Kheidri, M., Jr., & Beatty, R.W (1983). A comparison of United States and Japanese perceptions of equity in the employment exchange. Journal of Labor Problems, 17, 181-192.
6.
Bottenberg, R.A., & Christal, R.E. (1961). An iterative techniquefor clustering criteria which retains optimum predictive efficiency (WADD-TN-61-30, ASTIA Doc. AD-261-615). Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Personnel Laboratory, Wright Air Development Division.
7.
Chung, K. H., & Gray, M.A. (1982, May). Can we adopt the Japanese methods of human resource management?Personnel Administrator, 41-46.
8.
Copeland, J. B., Shapiro, D., Williams, E., & Matsumoto, N. (1987, February 2). How to win over a Japanese boss. Newsweek, pp. 46-48.
9.
Cook, R. L., & Stewart, T.R. (1975). A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective descriptions of judgmental policy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 31-45.
10.
Cooley, WW, & Lohnes, PR. (1971). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.
11.
Darlington, R.B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
12.
Deming, WE. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
13.
Dudycha, A.L. (1970). A Monte Carlo evaluation of JAN: A technique for capturing and clustering raters' policies. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 501-516.
Einhorn, H.J. (1971). Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 1-27.
16.
Feild, H.S., & Holley, W H. (1975). Traits in performance ratings: Their importance in public employment. Public Personnel Management, 4, 327-330.
17.
Harrington, H.J. (1987). The improvement process: How America's leading companies improve quality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hatvany, N., & Pucik, V. (1981). An integrated management system: Lessons from Japanese experience. Academy of Management Review, 6, 469-480.
19.
Helfand, G. (1983, June). The applicability of Japanese management techniques in the American public sector: Some cultural considerations. Public Productivity Review, 105-111.
20.
Heneman, H.G. (1973). Impact of performance on managerial pay levels and pay changes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 128-130.
21.
Hoekstra, M., & Wilke, H. (1972). Wage recommendations in management groups: A cross-cultural study. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en harr Grensgebieden, 27, 266-271.
22.
Illgen, D.R., & Favero, J.L. (1985). Limits in generalization from psychological research to performance appraisal processes. Academy of Management Review, 10, 311-321.
23.
Ishida, H. (1986). Transferability of Japanese human resource management abroad. Human Resource Management, 25, 103-120.
24.
Keys, J.B., & Miller, T.R. (1984). The Japanese management theory jungle. Academy of Management Review, 9, 342-353.
25.
Kotkin, J., & Kishimoto, Y. (1986, April). Theory F Inc. Magazine, pp. 53-60.
26.
Lawler, E.E. (1981). Pay and organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Luthans, F., McCaul, H.S., & Dodd, N.G. (1985). Organizational commitment: A comparison of American, Japanese, and Korean Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 213-219.
28.
Misumi, J. (1985). The behavioral science of leadership: An interdisciplinary Japanese research program. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
29.
Nonaka, I., & Johansson, J.K. (1985). Japanese management: What about the "hard" skills?Academy of Management Review, 10, 181-191.
30.
Ouchi, W (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31.
Pascale, R.T, & Athos, A.G. (1981). The art of Japanese management. New York: Warner Books.
32.
Ryterband, E.C., & Thiagarajan, K.M. (1968). Managerial attitudes toward salaries as afunction of social and economic development. (Tech. Rep. No. 24). New York: University of Rochester, Management Research Center.
33.
Shadforth, J. A. (1980). Employee compensation increases: A cross-cultural comparison. Unpublished master's thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
34.
Sherer, PD., Schwab, D.P., & Heneman, H.C., III. (1987). Managerial salary-raise decisions: A policy-capturing approach. Personnel Psychology, 40, 27-38.
35.
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649-744.
36.
Taylor, R.L., & Wilsted, W.D. (1974). Capturing judgment policies: A field study of performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 440-449.
37.
Tsurumi, Y. (1978). The best of times and the worst of times: Japanese management in America. Columbia Journal of World Business, 14, 56-61.
38.
Zemke, R. (1981). What's good for Japan may not be best for your training department. Training, 18, 62-65.
