Previous reviews documenting the low validity and utility associ-ated with personality measures should not lead researchers in the area of personnel selection to abandon the use of such variables. The lack offindings in past research can be explained by (a) misspecification of the model by anticipating direct effects; (b) inadequate statistical power; and (c) contamination of measures by relying on self-report or observational methods. An alternative model in which personality measures have interactive effects with ability tests in predicting per-formance provides a stronger theoretical rationale to support a rela-tionship between personality variables and performance. Sample sizes also need to be increased significantly in order to provide adequate tests of the validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Measures of personality traits based on perception and judgment pro-vide a more promising approach to obtaining less contaminated in-dices. Future research that avoids the problems of the past may pro-vide a more positive picture of the utility of personality traits as screening devices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arvey, R.D., & Campion, J.E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of re-cent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
2.
Beatty, R.W (1975). A two-year study of hard-core unemployed clerical workers: Effects of scho-lastic achievement, clerical skill and self-esteem on job success. Personnel Psychology, 28, 165-173.
3.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
French, E.G. (1958). The interaction of achievement motivation and ability in problem-solving success, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 306-309.
6.
Friedlander, F., & Greenberg, S. (1971). Effect of job attitudes, training, and organization climate on performance of the hardcore unemployed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 287-295.
7.
Fromkin, H.L., & Streufert, S. (1976). Laboratory experimentation. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 415-465). Chicago: Rand McNally.
8.
Ghiselli, E.E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 20, 461-477.
9.
Greenhaus, J.H., & Badin, I.J. (1974). Self-esteem, performance, and satisfaction: Some tests of a theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 722-726.
10.
Guion, R.M., & Gottier, R.F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Per-sonnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.
11.
Hall, D.T., & Foster, L.W (1977). A psychological success cycle and goal setting: Goals, perfor-mance, and attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 282-290.
12.
Heider, F (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
13.
Hobert, R., & Dlinnette, M.D. (1967). Development of moderator variables to enhance the predic-tion of managerial effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 50-64.
14.
Hollenbeck, J.R., & Brief, A.P. (1984). A control theory approach to cognitive consistency pre-dictions. Paper presented at the national meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA.
15.
Holtzman, W H. (1965). Personality structure. In P.R. Farnsworth, O. McNemer and Q. McNemer (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (pp. 119-165). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
16.
Hunter, J.E., & Hunter, R.E (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job perfor-mance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 73-98.
17.
Inkson, J.H.K. (1978). Self-esteem as a moderator of the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 243-247.
18.
James, L.R., & Brett, J.M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
19.
Kipnis, D. (1962). A noncognitive correlate of performance among lower aptitude men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 76-80.
20.
Korman, A.K. (1968). Task success, task popularity, and self-esteem as influences on task liking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 484-490.
21.
Landy, FEJ. (1985). The psychology of work behavior. Dorsey Press; Homewood, IL.
22.
Lodahl, T.M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
23.
Maier, N.R.F (1955). Psychology in industry. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
24.
Morrison, R.F (1977). Career adaptivity: The effective adaptation of managers to changing role demands. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 549-558.
25.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Osgood, C.E., & Tannebaum, PH. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62, 42-55.
27.
Rabinowitz, S., & Hall, D.T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 265-288.
28.
Ryckman, R.M., & Rodda, WC. (1972). Confidence, maintenance, and performance as a function of chronic self-esteem, and initial task performance. Psychological Record, 22, 241-247.
29.
Schmidt, FL., Hunter, J.E., & Urry, V.W (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473-485.
30.
Terborg, J.R., Richardson, P., & Pritchard, R.D. (1980). Person-situation effects in the prediction of performance: An investigation of ability, self-esteem, and reward contingencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 574-583.
31.
Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. (1978). Federal Register, 43, 38290-38309.
32.
Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
33.
Weiss, H.M. (1977). Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior: The role of modeling in orga-nizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 89-105.
34.
Weiss, H.M. (1978). Social learning of work values in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychol-ogy, 63, 711-718.
35.
Weiss, H.M., & Knight, PA. (1980). The utility of humility: Self-esteem, information search, and problem-solving efficiency. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 216-223.
36.
Weiss, H.M., & Shaw, J.B. (1979). Social influences on judgments about tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 126-140.
37.
Wiener, Y (1973). Task ego-involvement and self-esteem as moderators of situationally devalued self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 225-232.
