This study investigated the joint effects of perceived environmental uncertainty and dependence on resources on organizational structure and performance. Findings from two diverse settings that are considered in light of historical developments indicate that organic structures are associated with low resource dependence and that performance is not explained by the fit between environment and organization structure, but is significantly related to organic structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H.E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
Aldrich, H.E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79-105.
3.
Alexander, J.W, & Randolph, WA. (1985). The fit between technology and structure as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 844-859.
4.
Ansoff, H.I. (1979). The changing shape of the strategic problem. In D.E. Schendel & C.W Hofer (Eds.), Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning (pp. 30-44). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
5.
Bettis, R., & Prahaland, C.K. (1983). The visible and the invisible hand: Resource allocation in the industrial sector. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 27-43.
6.
Burns, T, & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
7.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Daft, R.L., & Macintosh, N.B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 207-224.
9.
Dewar, R.D., Whetten, D.A., & Boje, D. (1980). An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales of centralization, formalization and task routineness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 120-128.
10.
Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514-539.
11.
Duncan, R.B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313-327.
12.
Ford, J.D., & Slocum, J.W, Jr. (1977). Size, technology, environment and the structure of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 2, 561-575.
13.
Freeman, J. (1982). Organizational life cycles and natural selection processes. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 1-32). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program change and organizational properties. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 503-579.
16.
Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1969). Routine technology, social structure, and organizational goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 366-377.
17.
Hrebiniak, L.G. (1981). The Harvard organization and environment research program: An overview and critique. In A.H. Van de Ven & W E Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational design and behavior (pp. 338-345). New York: Wiley.
18.
Hrebiniak, L.G., & Snow, C.W (1980). Industry differences in environmental uncertainty and organizational characteristics related to uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 750-759.
19.
Jelinek, M. (1977). Technology, organizations, and contingency. Academy of Management Review, 2, 17-26.
20.
Kimberly, J.R. (1976). Organization size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 571-596.
21.
Lawrence, P.R. (1981). The Harvard organization and environment research program: An overview and critique. In A.H. Van de Ven & WE Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational design and behavior (pp. 311-337). New York: Wiley.
22.
Lawrence, P.R., & Dyer, D. (1983). Renewing American industry. New York: Free Press.
23.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1-47.
24.
Meyer, J.W, Scott, W.R., & Deal, T.E. (1979, March 2-3). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure explaining the structure of educational organizations. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Service Organizations, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA.
25.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Mindlin, S. (1974). Organizational dependence on environment and organizational structure: A reexamination of the findings of the Aston Group. Unpublished master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
27.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
Negandhi, A.R., & Reimann, B.D. (1973). Task environment, decentralization and organizational effectiveness. Human Relations, 26, 203-214.
29.
Pennings, J. M. (1975). The relevance of the structure contingency model for organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 393-410.
30.
Perrow, C. A. (1967). A framework for comparative organizational analysis. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-208.
31.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
32.
Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 69-82.
33.
Ramanujam, V., Venkatraman, N., & Camillus, J.C. (1986). Multi-objective assessment of effectiveness of strategic planning: A discriminant analysis approach. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 347-372.
34.
Schoonhoven, C.B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency 'theory.'Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349-377.
35.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Tung, R.L. (1979). Dimensions of organizational environments: An exploratory study of their impact on organization structure. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 672-693.
37.
Van de Ven, A., & Delbecq, A.L. (1974). A task contingent model of work unit structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 183-197.
38.
Van de Ven, A., & Drazin, R. (1985). The concept of fit in contingency theory. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 333-365). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
39.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
40.
Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1986). Structural adaptations to environments. Academy of Management Review, 11, 9-21.
