This study reports exploratory empirical research regarding divestment decision-making, focusing especially on the role of business unit size in such decisions. Data from two related studies suggest that unit size has an important impact on divestment decision-making. Corporate strategists should devote more attention to the size variable when considering acquisitions, resource allocations, and managerial career paths.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, S.A. (1978). Organizational choices and general management influence networks in divisionalized companies. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 341-365.
2.
Andrews, K.R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy (rev. ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
3.
Ansoff, H.I. (1965) Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Baird, I.S. (1984, August). What is risk anyway? The treatment of risk in strategic management. Paper presented at the national meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA.
5.
Bing, G. (1978). Corporate divestment. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
6.
Bing, G. (1980). Corporate acquisition. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
7.
Boddewyn, J.J. (1979). Foreign divestment: Magnitude and factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 10, 21-27.
8.
Bower, J. L. (1970). Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
9.
Burgelman, R.A. (1984). On the interplay of process and content in internal corporate ventures: Action and cognition in strategy-making. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2-6.
10.
Cook, J.W (1981). The influence of decision processes and firm size on R&D allocations: An econometric investigation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 386-390.
11.
Duhaime, I.M. (1981). Influences on the divestment decisions of large diversified firms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
12.
Duhaime, I.M., & Grant, J.H. (1984). Factors influencing divestment decision-making: Evidence from a field study. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 301-318.
Gilmour, S.C. (1973). The divestment decision process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School.
15.
Grinyer, P.H., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1981). Strategy, structure, size, and bureaucracy. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 471-486.
16.
Harrigan, K.R. (1981). Deterrents to divestiture. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 306-323.
17.
Hofer, C.W, & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West.
18.
Kitching, J. (1967, November-December). Why do mergers miscarry?Harvard Business Review, 45, 84-101.
19.
Koch, J.L., & Fox, C.L. (1978). The industrial relations setting, organizational forces and the form and content of worker participation. Academy of Management Review, 3, 572-583.
20.
Leontiades, M. (1980). Strategies for diversification and change. Boston: Little, Brown.
21.
Lioukas, S.K., & Xerokostas, D.A. (1982). Size and administrative intensity in organizational divisions. Management Science, 28, 854-868.
22.
Lovejoy, EA. (1971). Divestmentfor profit. New York: Financial Executive Research Foundation.
23.
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246-275.
24.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J.A. (1982). Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 465-499.
Shillinglaw, G. (1959). Profit analysis for abandonment decision. In Solomon, E., (Ed.) The management of corporate capital (pp. 269-281). New York: The Free Press.
27.
Simon, Herbert A. (1965). The shape of automation. New York: Harper and Row.
28.
Vignola, L. (1974). Strategic divestment. New York: American Management Association.
29.
Weiner, N., & Mahoney, TA. (1981). A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 453-470.
