Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study investigated the role of self-serving biases in leaders' and subordinates' attributions for group performance and their appropriateness ratings of various supervisory actions. Subjects were 144 undergraduate students who were randomly assigned to the roles of leader or subordinate and asked to work on a simulated manufacturing task. Following a 20-minute work session, groups received either high or low performance feedback. Leaders and subordinates then made attributions for the group's performance and rated the appropriateness of various supervisory actions. Analyses indicated that leaders attributed low group performance to subordinates, whereas subordinates attributed low group performance to leaders. In addition, leaders rated the supervisory actions of training and punishment as more appropriate than did subordinates. The implications of these findings for attributional approaches to leadership, leader-subordinate conflict, and leadership training are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson, R.P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129-133.

Birnberg, J.G. , Frieze, I.H. , & Shields, M.D. (1977). The role of attribution theory in control systems. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 2, 189-200.

Dobbins, G.H. (1985). Sex effects in leaders' responses to poor performers: An attributional interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 387-398.

Dweck, C. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674-685.

Gioia, D.A. , & Sims, H.P. (1985). Self-serving bias and actor-observer differences in organizations: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 547-563.

Green, S. , & Liden, R. (1980). Contextual and attributional influences upon control decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 453-458.

Green, S. , & Mitchell, T. (1979).Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429-458.

Harvey, J.H. , & McGlynn, R.P. (1982). Matching words to phenomena: The case of the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 345-346.

Harvey, J.H. , Town, J.P. , & Yarkin, K.L. (1981). How fundamental is "The fundamental attribution error"? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 346-349.

10.

Harvey, J.H. , & Weary, G. (1984). Current issues in attribution theory and research. In M. Rosenzweig & L. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 427-459). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

11.

Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.

12.

Herr, D. , & Gaebelein, J. (1978). Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 207-216.

13.

Jones, E.E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 104-117.

14.

Kelley, H.H. (1972).Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. Jones , D. Kanouse , H. Kelley , R. Nisbett , S. Valins , & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

15.

Kolb, D. , Rubin, I. , & McIntyre, J. (1979). Organizational psychology: An experiental approach (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

16.

McElroy, J.C. , & Downey, H.K. (1982). Observation in organizational research: Panacea to the performance-attribution effect. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 822-835.

17.

Mitchell, T.R. , & Wood, R.E. (1980). Supervisors' responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 123-138.

18.

Schlenker, B.R. , & Miller, R.S. (1977). Egocentrism in groups: Self-serving bias or logical information processing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 755-764.

19.

Schmidt, FL. , Hunter, J.E. , McKenzie, R.C. , & Muldrow, T.W (1979). The impact of valid selection procedures on work force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609-626.

20.

Weiner, B. (1985). Human motivation. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc.

21.

Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287.

Self-Serving Biases in Leadership: A Laboratory Experiment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References