This article examines the potential of applying network analysis to attribution theories of leadership. Network analysis allows the identification of social groups linked together by work, friendship, influence, or communication relations and of the relative position of actors within the social group. Moreover, network properties such as centrality, influence domain or prestige, and the presence of isolates enable the identification of leaders in relation to their position, status, and influence in a particular social setting. The use of network analysis in evaluating leader-subordinate relationships and leader behavior descriptions is discussed and a research agenda suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartol, K.M., & Butterfield, D.A. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446-454.
2.
Boje, D.M., & Whetten, D.A. (1981). Effects of organizational strategies and contextual constraints on centrality and attributions of influence in interorganizational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 378-395.
3.
Brass, D.J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539.
4.
Burt, R. (1977). Structure: A computer program providing basic datafor the analysis of empirical positions in a system of actors. Berkeley: University of California, Survey Research Center Working Paper 5.
5.
Chacko, T.I., & McElroy, J.C. (1983). The cognitive component in Locke's theory of goal setting: Suggestive evidence for a causal attribution interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 104-118.
6.
DeNisi, A.S., & Pritchard, R.D. (1978). Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 358-366.
7.
Feldman, J.M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
8.
Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
10.
Green, S.G., & Mitchell, T.R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and and Human Performance, 23, 429-458.
11.
Griffin, R.W (1980). Relationships among individual, task design, and leader behavior variables. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 665-683.
12.
Hargrett, N.T. (1981). Potential behavioral consequences of attributions of locus of control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 63-68.
13.
House, R.J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-328.
14.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage University Paper.
15.
Knowlton, WA., & Mitchell, T.R. (1980). Effects of causal attributions on a supervisor's evaluation of subordinate's performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 459-466.
16.
Lin, N. (1976). Foundations of social research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Lincoln, J.R. (1982). Intra (and inter-) organizational networks. In S.B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations: Vol. 1 (pp. 1-38). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
Lord, R.G., Binning, J.F., Rush, M.C., & Thomas, J.C. (1978). The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 27-39.
19.
Marsden, PV (1976). [Digraph, programmed in FORTRAN IV, Version 1, March, NSF No. 75-13113].
20.
McCall, M.W (1983). Leaders and leadership: Of substance and shadow. In J.R. Hackman, E.E. Lawler, & L.W Porter (Eds.), Perspectives on behavior in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 476-486). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
McElroy, J.C. (1982). A typology of attribution leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 7413-417.
22.
McElroy, J.C., & Downey, H.K. (1983). Rater involvement as a moderator of performance cues and leader behavior descriptions. Journal of Management, 9, 41-54.
23.
Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager's job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 53 (4), 49-61.
24.
Mitchell, T.R. (1982). Attributions and actions: A note of caution. Journal of Mangement, 8, 65-74.
25.
Mitchell, T.R., Larson, J.R., & Green, S.G. (1977). Leader behavior, situational moderations, and group performance: An attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 254-268.
26.
Mitchell, T.R., & Wood, R.E. (1980). Supervisor's response to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 123-138.
27.
Mowday, R.T. (1981). Viewing turnover from the prospective of those who remain: The relationship of job attitudes to attributions of the causes of turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 120-123.
28.
Pearce, J.A., & David, F.R. (1983). A social network approach to organization design-performance. Academy of Management Review, 8, 436-444.
29.
Pepitone, A. (1981). Lessons from the history of social psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 972-985.
30.
Pfeffer, J. (1977). The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2, 104-112.
31.
Phillips, J.S. (1984). The accuracy of leadership ratings: A cognitive categorization perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 125-138.
32.
Phillips, J.S., & Lord, R.G. (1981). Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 143-163.
33.
Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R.G. (1986). Notes on the practical and theoretical consequences of implicit leadership theories for the future of leadership measurement. Journal of Management, 12, 31-41.
34.
Porac, J.F., Nottenburg, G., & Eggert, J. (1981). On extending Weiner's attributional model to organizational contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 124-126.
35.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T.H. (1973). The influence of sex-role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 44-48.
36.
Salancik, G.R., Calder, B.J., Rowland, K.M., Leblebici, H., & Conway, M. (1975). Leadership as an outcome of social structure and process: A multidimensional analysis. In J.G Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadershipfrontiers (pp. 81-102). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
37.
Staw, B.M. (1975). Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A new alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414-432.
38.
Szilagyi, A.D., & Schweiger, D.M. (1984). Matching managers to strategies: A review and suggested framework. Academy of Management Review, 9, 626-637.
39.
Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., & Fombrum, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4, 507-519.
40.
Tsui, A. S. (1984). A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 64-96.
