This review highlights the relevance of argumentation and narration for organizational communication, which is the exchange of information among organizational participants from which meaning is inferred. The links between argument and organizational rationality and between the narrative paradigm and organizational storytelling are discussed. Organizational and communication variables are viewed as mutually relevant. As the mixtures of argumentation and narration change, interaction changes, and different organizational structures are created. These processes have implications for both scholars and practicing managers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, P.A. (1983). Decison making by objection and the Cuban missile crisis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 201-222.
Bourgeois, L.J., III. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29-39.
9.
Bowers, J.W. & Bradac, J.J. (1982). Issues in communication theory: A metatheoretical analysis. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 1-27). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Brockriede, W. (1982). Arguing about human understanding. Communication Monographs, 49, 137-147.
11.
Brockriede, W. (1985). Constructs, experience and argument. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 151-163.
12.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A.NV Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of microand macro-sociologies (pp. 277-303). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539-553.
14.
Carleton, W.M. (1978). What is rhetorical knowledge? A response to Farrell - and more. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 313-328.
15.
Cheney, G. (1983a). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
16.
Cheney, G. (1983b). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143-158.
Cherwitz, R.A., & Hikins, J.W. (1986). Communication and knowledge: An investigation in rhetorical epistemology. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
19.
Cleveland, H. (1985). The knowledge executive. New York: Dutton.
20.
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1976). People, problems, solutions and the ambiguity of relevance. In J.G., March & J. R. Olsen (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations (pp. 24-37). Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
21.
Collins, R. (1983). Micromethods as a basis for macrosociology. Urban Life, 12, 184-202.
22.
Cox, R.J., & Willard, C.A. (1982). Introduction: The field of argumentation. In R.J. Cox & C.A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. xiii-xlvii). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
23.
Crable, R.E. (1982). Knowledge-as-status: On argument and epistemology. Communication Monographs, 49, 249-262.
24.
Crites, J. O. (1976). Work and careers. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 131-165). Chicago: Rand McNally.
25.
Davis, M.S. (1971). That's interesting: Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Science, 1, 309-344.
Delia, J .G. (1970). The logic fallacy, cognitive theory, and the enthymeme: A search for the foundations of reasoned discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56, 140-148.
28.
Dewar, R., & Hage, J. (1978). Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 111-136.
29.
Donaldson, L. (1985). In defense of organization theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Eisenberg, E.M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
31.
Farrell, T. B. (1976). Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 1-14.
32.
Farrell, T.B. (1978). Social knowledge II. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 329-334.
33.
Farrell, T.B., & Goodnight, G.T. (1981). Accidental rhetoric: The root metaphors of Three Mile Island. Communication Monographs, 48, 271-300.
34.
Fisher, W.R (1978). Toward a logic of good reasons. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 376-384.
35.
Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1-22.
36.
Fisher, W.R (1985a). The narrative paradigm: An elaboration. Communication Monographs, 52, 347-367.
37.
Fisher, W.R. (1985b). The narrative paradigm: The connection with logic. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Department of Communication Arts and Sciences.
38.
Fisher, W.R. (1985c). The narrative paradigm: in the beginning. Journal of Communication, 35, 74-89.
39.
Frost, P.J. (Ed.) (1985). Special issue: Organizational symbolism. Journal of Management, 11 (2).
40.
Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method. New York: Basic.
41.
Giddens, A. (1977). Studies in social and political theory. New York: Basic.
42.
Hawes, L. C. (1974). Social collectives as communication: Perspective on organizational behavior. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 497-502.
43.
Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C.A., Schneck, R.E., & Pennings, J.M. (1971). A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
44.
Huff, A.S. (1983). A rhetorical examination of strategic change. In L.R. Pondy, PJ. Frost, G. Morgan, & T.C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 167-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
45.
Jablin, E. M. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1201-1222.
46.
Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1982). Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach. In R.J. Cox & C.A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 205-237). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
47.
Jamieson, K.H. (1985, November 4). The idea of a university in an electronic age. Precis [faculty/staff newsletter of the University of Maryland, College Park Campus], 16, (10).
48.
Jensen, M.C. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review, 58, 319-339.
49.
Johnstone, H.W (1973). Rationality and rhetoric in philosophy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 381-389.
50.
Kaufer, D.S. (1979). Point of view in rhetorical situations: Classical and romantic contrasts and contemporary implications. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 171-186.
51.
Kaufer, D.S. (1981). Ironic evaluations. Communication Monographs, 48, 25-38.
52.
Kaufer, D. S., & Neuwirth, C. M. (1982). Foregrounding norms and ironic communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, 28-36.
53.
Kinsey, B.A. (1985). Congressional staff: The cultivation and maintenance of personal networks in an insecure work environment. Urban Life, 13, 395-422.
54.
Krippendorff, K. (1982, May). Paradox and information. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Boston, MA.
55.
Layton, R.A. (1980). Management science in the 1980's [Letter to the editor]. Management Science, 26, 1189-1192.
56.
Locke, E.A., & Schweiger, D.M. (1979). Participation in decision-making: One more look. In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. I (pp. 265-339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57.
March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
58.
March, J.G., & Sevon, G. (1984). Gossip, information, and decision making. In L.S. Sproull & P.D. Larkey (Eds.), Advances in information processing in organizations: Vol. I (pp. 95-107). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
59.
March, J.G., & Simon, H.W, (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
60.
Martin, J. (1981). Stories and scripts in organizational settings. In A.H. Hastorf & A.M. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive social psychology (pp. 255-305). New York: Elsevier.
Martin, J., & Powers, M.E. (1983). Truth or corporate propaganda: The value of a good war story. In L.R. Pondy, P.J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T.C. Dandridge, (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 93-107). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
63.
Mason, R.O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15, B403-B414.
McKerrow, R.E. (1982). Rationality and reasonableness in a theory of argument. In R.J. Cox & C.A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 105-122). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
66.
Natanson, M., & Johnstone, H.W, Jr. (Eds.). (1965). Philosophy, rhetoric, and argumentation. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
67.
Newman, R.P (1982). Foreign policy: Decision and argument. In R.J. Cox & W.C. Arthur (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp.318-342). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
68.
O'Reilly, C.A., III, & Pondy, L.R. (1979). Organizational communication. In S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behavior (pp. 119-150). Columbus, OH: Grid.
69.
Pascale, R.T., & Athos, A.G. (1981). The art of Japanese management. New York: Warner.
70.
Peters, T.J., & Waterman, R.H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
71.
Poole, M.S. (1985). Communication and organizational climate: Review, critique, and a new perspective. In R.D. McPhee & P.K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 79-108). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
72.
Poole, M.S., Seibold, D.R., & McPhee, R.D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
73.
Porter, L.W, & Roberts, K.H. (1976). Organizational communication. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (pp. 1553-1589). Chicago: Rand McNally.
74.
Railsback, C.C. (1983). Beyond rhetorical relativism: A structural material model of truth and objective reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 351-363.
75.
Ranson, S., Hinings, B., & Greenwood, R. (1980). The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1-17.
76.
Redding, W.C. (1985). Stumbling toward identity: The emergence of organizational communication as a field of study. In R. D. McPhee & P.K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 15-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
77.
Riley, P. (1983). A structurationist account of political culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 414-437.
78.
Rosen, M. (1985). Breakfast at Spiro's: Dramaturgy and dominance. Journal of Management, 11 (2), 31-48.
79.
Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. M. Staw & G.R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1-54). Chicago: St Clair.
80.
Schein, E.H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81.
Schilit, WK., & Locke, E.A. (1982). A study of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 304-316.
82.
Schneider, B., & Reicher, A.E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19-39.
83.
Scott, R.L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal, 18, 9-17.
84.
Simon, H.A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest (pp. 37-72). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
85.
Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 257-273.
86.
Starbuck, W H. (1985). Acting first and thinking later: Theory versus reality in strategic change. In J.M. Pennings (Ed.), Organizational strategy and change (pp. 336-372). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87.
Tompkins, P.K. (1977). Management qua communication in rocket research and development. Communication Monographs, 44, 1-26.
88.
Tompkins, P.K. (1978). Organizational metamorphosis in space research and development. Communication Monographs, 45, 110-118.
89.
Tompkins, P.K. (1984). The functions of human communication in organizations. In C.C. Arnold & J.W Bowers (Eds.), Handbook of rhetorical and communication theory (pp. 659-719). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
90.
Tompkins, P. K. (1985, November). Symbolism as the substance of organization. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Annual Convention, Denver, CO.
91.
Tompkins, P.K., & Cheney, G. (1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In R.D. McPhee & PK. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 179-210). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
92.
Tompkins, P.K., Fisher, J.Y, Infante, D.A., & Tompkins, E.L. (1975). Kenneth Burke and the inherent characteristics of formal organizations: A field study. Speech Monographs, 42, 135-142.
93.
Trujillo, N. (1985). Organizational communication as cultural preformance: Some managerial considerations. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 201-224.
94.
Useem, M. (1982). Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 199-226.
95.
Zey-Ferrell, M. (1981). Criticisms of the dominant perspective on organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 22, 181-205.
