Few studies have attempted to empirically verify the concept of corporate social responsibility, although it has been discussedfor decades. This study is a multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of a sample of 549 persons that suggests that corporate social responsibility can be viewed as a three-dimensional construct. The three dimensions include economic-noneconomiclhuman outcomes, ethical considerations, and consequences for relevant interest groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, J.S. (1977). Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 5, 185-213.
2.
Beauchamp, T.L. (1982). The ethical foundations of economic justice. Review of Social Economy, 60, 291-300.
3.
Cavanagh, G.E, Moberg, J., & Velasquez, M.The ethics of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 6, 363-374.
4.
Coombs, C.H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
5.
Donaldson, T. (1962). What justice demands. Review of Social Economy, 60, 301-310.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine p. 32-32.
8.
Green, R. E., & Rao, VR. (1972). Applied multidimensional scaling: A comparison of approach and algorithms. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
9.
Green, R. E., & Dill, D.S. (1975). Research for marketing decisions (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
Harrington, M. (1979). Beyond the welfare state. In T.L. Beauchamp & N.E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 99-107). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social responsibilities of business managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 135-143.
12.
Holmes, R. (1979). The concept of corporate responsibility. In T.L. Beauchamp & N.E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 151-160). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Kant, I. (1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals (L. White, Trans.). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
14.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-development approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
15.
Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrics, 29, 1-27.
16.
Kruskal, J.B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beveraly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
18.
Ibsner, B.Z., & Schmidt, WH. (1984, April). The significance of value compatibility between managers and their organizations. Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Western Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
19.
Rest, J.R. (1979). Revised manualfor the defining issues test: An objective test of moral judgment development. Minneapolis: Minnesota Moral Research Projects.
20.
Sethi, S.P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17, 58-64.
21.
Shocker, A.D., & Sethi, S.P. (1974). An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies. In A.D. Sethi (Ed.), The unstable ground: Corporate social policy in a dynamic society (pp. 67-80). Los Angeles: Melville Publishing.
22.
Simon, J.G., Powers, C.W, & Gunnemann, J.P. (1979). The responsibilities of corporations and their owners. In T.L. Beauchamp & N.E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc.
24.
Stone, C.D. (1972). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 453487.
25.
Zenisek, T.J. (1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4, 359-368.
