Attempts by organizational researchers to conceptualize and explicate the concepts of technology and structure have been subject to inconsistencies and misspecifications. These problems stem from the absence of an integrative framework that considers these concepts simultaneously. Such a framework is developed here, rooted both in the theoretical work on technology and structure and in systems theory. This framework specifies the qualitatively different components that constitute technology in organizations, the hierarchical arrangement of these components, and the nature of organizational structuring. The components considered are those associated with the concrete (living and nonliving), the abstract, and the activity systems that characterize organizations. These system components are integrated into a model of technology and structure. Implications of this model for the management of technological and structural change are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlderferC.P. (1977). Group and intergroup relations. In HackmanJ.R.SuttleJ.L. (Eds.), Improving life at work (pp. 227–296). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
2.
ArgyrisC. (1962). Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness.Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.
3.
BakerF. (1973). Organizations as open systems. In BakerF. (Ed.), Organizational systems: General system approaches to complex organizations (pp. 1–25). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
4.
BavelasA. (1948). A mathematical model for group structuresJournal of Applied Anthropology, 7, 16–30.
5.
BergerC.J.CummingsL.L. (1979). Organizational structure, attitudes, and behavior. In StawB. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 169–208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
BillingsR.S.KlimoskiR.J.BreaughJ.A. (1977). The impact of change in technology on job characteristics: A quasi-experimentAdministrative Science Quarterly, 22, 318–339.
7.
BlauP.M. (1979). Presidential address: Parameters of social structureAmerican Sociological Review, 39, 615–635.
8.
BurackE.H. (1975). Organization analysis: Theory and applications.Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
9.
ChaseR.B.TansikD.A. (1983). The customer contact model for organizational designManagement Science, 29, 1037–1050.
10.
ChildJ.MansfieldR. (1972). Technology, size, and organizational structureSociology, 6, 369–393.
11.
CookeR.A.RousseauD.M. (1981). Problems of complex systems: A model of system problem solving applied to schoolsEducational Administration Quarterly, 17, 15–41.
12.
DunsireA. (1978). Implementation in a bureaucracy.New York: St. Martin's Press.
13.
DuncanR.B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertaintyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 17, 562–578.
14.
EllulJ. (1972). The technological order. In MitchamC.MackeyR. (Eds.), Philosophy and technology (pp. 86–105). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1963).
15.
EtzioniA. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations.New York: Free Press.
16.
GeorgopoulosB.S. (Ed.). (1972). Organizational research on health institutions.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
17.
GeorgopoulosB.S. (1975). Hospital organization research: Review and sourcebook.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
18.
GeorgopoulosB.S.CookeR.A. (1979). Conceptual-theoretical framework for the organizational study of hospital emergency units (Working Paper Series No. 8011). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
19.
GerwinD. (1979). The comparative analysis of structure and technology: A critical appraisalAcademy of Management Review, 4, 41–52.
20.
GuetzkowH. (1965). Communication in organizations. In MarchJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 534–573). Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
HallR.H. (1972). Organizations: Structure and process.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
HermanJ.B.HulinC.L. (1972). Studying organization attributes from the individual and organizational frame of referenceOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 84–108.
23.
HicksonD.J. (1966). A convergence in organization theoryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 11, 229–237.
24.
HillsR.J. (1968). Toward a science of organization.Eugene, OR: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration.
25.
IngallsE.J. (1965). A review of assembly line balancingThe Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16, 244–254.
26.
InksonJ.H.K.HicksonD.J.PughD.S. (1970). Organizational context and structure: An abbreviated replicationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 15, 318–329.
27.
JacksonJ.H.MorganC.P. (1978). Organization theory: A macro perspective for management.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
JamesL.R.JonesA.P. (1976). Organizational structure: A review of structural dimensions and their conceptual relationships with individual attitudes and behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 74–113.
29.
KatzD.KahnR.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations (1st ed.). New York: Wiley.
30.
KatzD.KahnR.L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
31.
LawrenceP.R.LorschJ.W. (1967). Organizations and environment.Boston: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.
32.
LikertR. (1967). The human organization.New York: McGraw-Hill.
ParsonsT. (1960). Structure and processes in modern societies.New York: Free Press.
39.
PerrowC. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.
40.
PfefferJ. (1978). Organizational design.Arlington Heights, IL: AHM.
41.
PorterL.W.RobertsK.H. (1976). Communication in organizations. In DunnetteM.D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial-organizational psychology (pp. 1553–1589). Chicago: Rand McNally.
42.
PughD.S.HicksonD.J.HiningsC.R.TurnerC. (1968). Dimensions of organization structureAdministrative Science Quarterly, 13, 74–105.
43.
RadnorM.RubensteinA.H.BeanA.S. (1968). Integration and utilization of management science activities in organizationsOperational Research Quarterly, 19, 117–141.
44.
RansonS.HiningsB.GreenwoodR. (1980). The structuring of organizational structuresAdministrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1–17.
45.
ReimannB.C. (1977). Dimensions of technology and structure: An exploratory studyHuman Relations, 30, 545–566.
46.
RobertsK.H.HulinC.L.RousseauD.M. (1978). Developing an interdisciplinary science of organization.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
RousseauD.M. (1978). Characteristics of departments, positions, and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behaviorAdministrative Science Quarterly, 23, 521–540.
48.
RousseauD.M. (1979). Assessment of technology in organizations: Open versus closed system approachesAcademy of Management Review, 4, 531–542.
49.
RousseauD.M. (1983). Technology in organizations: A constructive review and analytic framework. In SeashoreS.E.LawlerE.E.MirvisP.H.CammannC. (Eds.), Assessing organizational change (pp. 229–255). New York: Wiley Interscience.
50.
SimonH.A. (1973). The organization of complex systems. In PatteeH.H. (Ed.), Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems (pp. 1–27). New York: Braziller.
51.
SimonH.A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
StanfieldG.G. (1976). Technology and organizational structure as theoretical categoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 21, 489–493.
53.
TersineR.J. (1980). Production/operations management: Concepts, structure, and analysis.New York: North Holland.
54.
ThompsonJ.D. (1967). Organizations in action.New York: Wiley.
55.
TuschmanM.L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation processAdministrative Science Quarterly, 22, 587–605.
56.
UlrichR.A.WeilandG.F. (1980). Organization design and theory.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
57.
Van de VenA.H.DelbecqA.L. (1974). A task contingent model of work unit structureAdministrative Science Quarterly, 19, 183–197.
58.
WoodwardJ. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice.London: Oxford University Press.
59.
ZaltmanG.DuncanR.B.HolbekJ. (1973). Innovations and organizations.New York: Wiley-Interscience.
