Taxonomic inquiry is emerging as an important type of research in the field of strategy. This paper builds a case for strategy taxonomy-building and addresses selected conceptual and methodological issues for researchers interested in such investigations. Among the issues discussed are the following: choosing variables to classify, framing the domain of the taxonomy, developing longitudinal taxonomies, manipulating variables, and incorporating organizational performance into strategic taxonomies. Drawing from the literature and from my own experiences in taxonomic studies, this paper is intended as a special supplement to more generic and technically detailed treatments of numerical classification.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Biggadike, R. (1981). The risky business of diversification. Harvard Business Review, 59(4), 131-137.
2.
Blau, P.M., & Scott, W.R. (1962). The structure of organizations. New York: Basic Books.
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
5.
Haas, J.E., Hall, R.H., & Johnson, N.H. (1966). Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of organizations. In R.V. Bowers (Ed.), Studies on behavior in organizations (pp. 157-180). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
6.
Hambrick, D.C. (1983a). An empirical typology of mature industrial-product environments. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 213-230.
7.
Hambrick, D.C. (1983b). High-profit strategies for mature capital-goods businesses: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 687-707.
8.
Hambrick, D.C. (in press). Strategies for mature industrial-product business: A taxonomic approach. In J.H. Grant (Ed.), Significant developments in strategic management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
Hambrick, D.C., MacMillan, I.C., & Day, D.L. (1982). Strategic attributes and performance in the four cells of the BCG matrix—A PIMS analysis of industrial-product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 510-531.
10.
Hambrick, D.C., & Schecter, S.M. (1983). Turnaround strategies for mature industrial product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 231-248.
11.
Harrigan, K.R. (1980). Strategies for declining businesses. Lexington, MA: Heath.
12.
Harrigan, K.R. (1983). Strategies for vertical integration. Lexington, MA: Heath.
13.
Hatten, K.J., Schendel, D.E., & Cooper, A.C. (1978). A strategic model for the U.S. brewing industry: 1952-1971. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 592-610.
14.
Hofer, C.W. (1975). Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 784-810.
15.
Hofer, C.W. (1980). Turnaround strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 1(1), 19-31.
16.
Joyce, W.F., & Slocum, J.W., Jr. (in press). Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. Academy of Management Journal.
17.
Lehmann, D.R. (1979). Market research and analysis. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
18.
MacMillan, I.C., Hambrick, D.C., & Day, D.L. (1982). The association between strategic attributes and profitability in the four cells of the BCG matrix—A PIMS based empirical analysis of industrial-product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 733-755.
19.
McKelvey, B. (1975). Guidelines for empirical classification of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 509-525.
20.
McKelvey, B. (1982). Organizational systematics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
Miles, R.E. (1983, August). Remarks in The use and usefulness of the taxonomic approach to strategy research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas.
22.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Miller, D. (1978). The role of multivariate Q-techniques in the study of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21, 515-531.
24.
Miller, D. (1981). Toward a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts. Journal of Management Studies, 18, 1-26.
25.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1977). Strategy-making in context: Ten empirical archetypes. Journal of Management Studies, 14, 253-280.
26.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1980). Archetypes of organizational transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 268-299.
Pinder, C.C., & Moore, L.F. (1979). The resurrection of taxonomy to aid the development of middle range theories of organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 99-118.
29.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
30.
Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., & Hinings, C.R. (1969). An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 115-126.
31.
Risley, G. (1972). Modern industrial marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Rumelt, R.P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. In D.E. Schendel & C.W. Hofer (Eds.), Strategic management (pp. 196-211). Boston: Little Brown.
33.
Samuel, Y., & Mannheim, B.F. (1970). A multidimensional approach toward a typology of bureaucracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 216-229.
Tushman, M.L., & Moore, W.L. (1982). Managing innovation over the product life cycle. In M.L. Tushman & W.L. Moore (Eds.), Readings on the management of innovation (pp. 131-150). Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
36.
Webster, F. (1979). Industrial marketing strategy. New York: Wiley.
37.
Woo, C.Y.Y., & Cooper, A.C. (1981). Strategies of effective low-share businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 301-318.
