The Importance of Objectivity and Falsification in Management Science

Armstrong, J.S. Advocacy and objectivity in science. Management Science, 1979, 25, 423-428.

Armstrong, J.S. Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula. Behavioral and Brain Science, 1982, 5, 197-199. (a)

Armstrong, J.S. Research on scientific journals: Implications for editors and authors. Journal of Forecasting, 1982, 1, 83-104. (b)

Atkinson, D.R. , Furlong, M.J. , & Wampold, B.E. Statistical significance, reviewer evalu-ations, and the scientific process: Is there a statistically significant relationship? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1982, 29, 189-194.

Christensen-Szalanski, J.J. , & Beach, L.R. The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. American Psychologist, in press.

Cotton, J.L. Objective versus advocacy models of scientific enterprise: A comment on the Mitroff myth. Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7, 133-135.

Greenwald, A. Consequences of prejudices against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bul-letin, 1975, 82, 1-20.

Harnad, S. Creative disagreement. The Sciences, 1979, 19, 18-20.

Mahoney, M. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1977, 1, 161-175.

Manwell, C. Peer review: A case history from the Australian Research Grants Committee. Search, 1979, 10, 81-86.

Peters, D.P. , & Ceci, S.J. Peer review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982, 5, 187-195.

Sieber, J.E. Whose ethics? Or the perils and ethics of studying powerful persons. Society for the Advancement of Social Psychology Newsletter, August 1983, 9, 1-5.