The grievance activity of work groups has received surprisingly little attention by either organizational behavior or industrial re-lations researchers. This study explores the impact of different work environments on the rate of grievance filing in a large, unionized manufacturing plant. The two aspects of the work environment exam-ined, (a) size of the primary work group and (b) type of work technology, were both significantly related to grievance rates. A batch production environment was associated with a substantially higher rate of grievance filing than were either mass or craft pro-duction. When the work technology effect was held constant, the size of the primary work group was negatively related to grievance rates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ash, P.The parties to the grievance. Personnel Psychology, 1970, 23, 13-37.
2.
Dalton, D.R., & Todor, W.D.Manifest needs of stewards: Propensity to file a grievance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 654-659.
3.
Dion, K.L.Cohesiveness as a determinant of ingroup-outgroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 163-171.
4.
Fiedler, F.E.A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Fleishman, E.A., & Harris, E.F.Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 1962, 15, 43-56.
7.
Freeman, R.B.Individual mobility and union voice in the labor market. American Economic Review, 1976, 65, 361-367.
8.
Hirschman, A.O.Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.
9.
House, R.J.A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 321-338.
10.
Keppel, G.Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
11.
Kirk, R.E.Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing, 1968.
12.
Kissler, G.D.Grievance activity and union membership: A study of government employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 459-462.
13.
Livernash, E.R., & Peach, D.A.Grievance initiation and resolution: A study in basic steel. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1974.
14.
Locke, E.A.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: McNally, 1976.
15.
Markham, S.E., Dansereau, F., & Alutto, J.A.Group size and absenteeism rates: A longi-tudinal analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 921-927.
16.
Mobley, W.H.Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 237-240.
17.
Mobley, W.H., Griffeth, R.W., Hand, H.H., & Meglino, B.M.Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 493-522.
18.
Muchinsky, P.M.Employee absenteeism: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1977, 10, 316-340.
19.
Muchinsky, P.M., & Maassarani, M.A.Work environment effects on public sector griev-ances. Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 403-414.
20.
Nicholson, N., Brown, C.A., & Chadwick-Jones, J.K.Absence from work and job satisfac-tion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 728-737.
21.
Peterson, R.B., & Lewin, D.A model for research and analysis of the grievance process. Thirty-fourth Annual Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 1982, 302-312.
22.
Porter, L.W., & Lawler, E.E., III. Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 23-50.
23.
Porter, L.M., & Steers, R.M.Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 151-176.
