A brief overview of attribution theory shows that current research is switching from a focus on the causes of attributions to their consequences. One important consequence of attributions about other people's behavior is the behavior illustrated towards that other person. A review of a variety of research areas shows that attributions about the causes of another person's behavior are only moderately good predictors of behavior. A particular area is reviewed in some detail showing the effects of a leader's attributions about a subordinate's behavior on the leader's actions towards that subordinate. A number of social, task and situational factors seem to be as important in predicting this behavior as attributions. The implications for further attributional research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baserman, M.H., & Atkins, R.S.Performance appraisal: An information-processing and attributional perspective. (Working paper no. 25-78-79.) Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, 1978.
2.
Beach, L.R., Mitchell, T.R., Deaton, M.D., & Prothero, J.Information relevance, content, and source credibility in the revision of opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 21, 1-16.
3.
Calder, B.J.An attribution theory of leadership. In B.M. Staw & G.R. Salancik (eds.), New Directions in Organizational Behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press, 1977.
4.
Feldman, J. M.Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 127-148.
5.
Frieze, I.H., Bar-Tal, D., & Carroll, J.S.New Approaches to Social Problems: Applications of Attribution Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
6.
Green, S. G., & Liden, R. C.Contextual and attributional influences on control decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 453-458.
7.
Green, S.G., & Mitchell, T.R.Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23, 429-458.
8.
Haefner, J.E.Race, age, sex and competence factors in employment selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 199-202.
9.
Heerwagen, J. Supervisors' responses to poor performance: The effects of attributional training and the analysis of costs of actions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, 1982.
10.
Ickes, W.J., & Kidd, R.F.An attributional analysis of helping behavior. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes and R.F. Kidd (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research (vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assn., 1976, 311-334.
11.
Ilgen, D.R., & Knowlton, W.A., Jr.Performance attributional effects on feedback from superiors. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 25, 441-456.
12.
Ilgen, D.R., Mitchell, T.R., & Fredrickson, J.W.Poor perfonners: Supervisors' and subordinates' responses. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1981, 27, 386-410.
13.
Kelley, H., & Mikela, J.Attribution theory and research. In M. Rosenzweig and L. Porter (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, 1980.
14.
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J.M.Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 22, 375-403.
15.
Kipnis, D.Does power corrupt?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 33-41.
16.
Kipnis, D.The Powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
17.
Knowlton, W.A., Jr., and Mitchell, T.R.Effects of causal attributions on a supervisor's evaluation of subordinates' performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 459-466.
18.
Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E. III. Performance appraisal effectiveness: Its assessment and determinants. In B. Staw (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, (vol. 1), Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1979.
Liden, R.C., & Mitchell, T.R.The use of personal policies in responding to student poor performance. Working paper. Seattle: School of Business, University of Washington, 1982.
21.
Mitchell, T.R., Green, S.G., & Wood, R.E.An attributional model of leadership and the poor performing subordinate: Development and validation. In B. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1981.
22.
Mitchell, T.R., & Kalb, L.S.The effects of job experience on supervisor attributions for a subordinate's poor performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 181-188.
23.
Mitchell, T.R., & Liden, R.C.The effects of the social context on performance evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1982, 29, 241-246.
24.
Mitchell, T. R., & Wood, R. E.Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 25, 123-138.
25.
O'Reilly, C., & Weitz, B.Managing marginal employees: The use of warnings and dismissals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25, 467-484.
26.
Pepitone, A.Lessons from the history of social psychology. American Psychologist, 1981. 36, 972-985.
27.
Peters, L.J., & OConnor, E.J.Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influence of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 5, 391-398.
28.
Peters, L.J., O'Connor, E.F., & Rudolf, C.J.The behavioral and affective consequences of situational variables relevant to performance settings, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 25, 79-96.
29.
Pettigrew, T.F.The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 461-476.
30.
Phillips, J.S., & Lord, R.G.Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1981, 28, 143-163.
31.
Richardson, D. C., & Campbell, J. L.Alcohol and wife abuse: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for wife abuse. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1980, 6. 51-56.
32.
Ross, L.The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (xol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
33.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J.An examination of need satisfaction models of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 427-456, 1978.
34.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J.A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 224-263.
35.
Staw, B.M., & Ross, J.Commitment in an experimenting society. A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 249-260.
36.
Tucker, D. H.. & Rowe, P. M.Relationship between expectancy, causal attributions and final hiring decisions in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1979, 64, 27-34.
37.
Wells, K.Adolescents' attributions for delinquent behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1980, 6, 63-67.
38.
Wood, R.E., & Mitchell, T.R.Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1981. 28, 356-378.
