This article presents a conceptual model that synthesizes communication concepts and Adams' equity theory. Using a receiver-oriented approach, organizational communication is seen as having reward value that is subject to social comparisons. Judgments of equity and inequity in the receipt and evaluation of "salient messages" affect the individual's perceptions of job satisfaction/dissatisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. S.Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1963, 67, 442-446.
2.
Adams, J. S.Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.
3.
Barnlund, D. C.A transactional model of communication. In L. L. Barker and R. K. Kibler (Eds.), Speech Communication Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971.
4.
Berkowitz, L., & Walster, E. (Eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press, 1976.
5.
Berne, E.Games people play. New York: Gross Press, 1964.
6.
Berscheid, E., Boye, D., & Walster, E.Retaliation as a means of restoring equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1968, 10,370-376.
7.
Blau, P.Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
8.
Carrell, M. R., & Dittrick, J. E.Equity theory: The recent literature, methodological considerations and new directions. Academy of Management Review1978, 3, 202-210.
9.
Chaney, F. B.Employee participation in manufacturing job design. Human Factors1969, 11, 101-106.
10.
Coch, L., & French, J.R.P., Jr.Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations1948, 1, 512-532.
11.
Goldhaber, Gerald M.Organizational communication. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown, 1974.
12.
Hollan, C. J., & Chesser, R. J.The relationship of personal influence dissonance on job tension, satisfaction, and involvement. Academy of Management Journal1976, 19, 308-314.
13.
Homans, G. C.Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, 1961.
14.
Lawler, E. E., III. Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality. Psychological Bulletin1968, 70, 596-610.
15.
Leventhal, G. S., Allen, J., & Kemelgor, B.Reducing inequity by reallocating rewards. Psychonomic Science1969, 14, 295-296.
16.
Maslow, A. H.Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row, 1954.
17.
Pearce, W.B. An overview of communication and interpersonal relationships. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1976.
18.
Prichard, R. D.Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance1969, 4, 176-211.
19.
Redding, W. C.Communication within the organization. New York: Industrial Communications Council, 1972.
20.
Redding, W. C., & Sanborn, G. A.Business and industrial communication. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.
21.
Ross, M., Thibaut, J., & Evenbeck, S.Some determinants of the intensity of social protest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology1971, 7, 401-418.
22.
Schmitt, D. R., & Marwell, G.Withdrawal and reward reallocation as responses to inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology1972, 8, 207-211.
23.
Schuler, R. S., & Kim, J. S.Interactive effects of participation in decision making, the goal setting process and feedback on employee satisfaction and performance. In R. L. Taylor, M. J. O'Connell, R. A. Zawacki, & D. D. Warrick (Eds.), Academy of Management Proceedings '75. Kansas City: Academy of Management, 1976.
24.
Shannon, C., & Weaver, N.The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
25.
Thayer, L.Communication and communication systems. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1968.
26.
Timm, Paul R.Worker responses to supervisory communication inequity: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Communication (in press).
27.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W.New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1973, 25, 151-176.
