This paper focuses on the level of administrative intensity in manufacturing firms. Based upon a sample of 32, it was found that two organizational variables, perceived environmental uncertainty and mass-output orientation of production technology, account for significant variation in administrative intensity levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akers, R. and T. A. Blowers, "Administrative Ratios and Organizational Size: A Longitudinal Examination."American Sociological Review, Vol. 36, 1971, pp. 278-286.
2.
Anderson, T. R. and S. Warkov, "Organizational Size and Functional Complexity: A Study of Administration in Hospitals,"American Sociological Review, Vol. 26, 1961, pp. 23-28.
3.
Blau, P. M., "A Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations,"American Sociological Review, Vol. 35, 1970, pp. 201-218.
4.
Child, J., "Parkinson's Progress: Accounting for the Number of Specialists in Organizations,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1973, pp. 328-348.
5.
Dill, W. R., "Environments as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1958, pp. 409-443.
6.
Duncan, Robert B., "The Effects of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty on Organizational Decision Unit Structure: A Cybernetic Model," Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, 1971.
7.
Durkheim, E., On the Social Division of Labor in Society, Translated by G. Simpson (New York: MacMillan, Part 2, 1933).
8.
Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L., "The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments."Human Relations, Vol. 18, 1965, pp. 21-32.
9.
Freeman, J. H., and J. Kronenfeld, "Problems of Definitional Dependency: The Case of Administrative Intensity,"Social Forces, Vol. 52, 1973, pp. 108-121.
10.
Haas, J. E., Richard Hall, and N. J. Johnson, "The Size of the Supportive Component in Organizations: A Multi-Organizational Analysis,"Social Forces, Vol. 43, 1963, pp. 9-17.
11.
Hawley, A. H., W. Boland, and M. Boland, "Population Size and Administration in Institutions of Higher Education,"American Sociological Review, Vol. 30, 1965, pp. 252-255.
12.
Hendershot, G. E., and T. F. James, "Size and Growth as Determinants of Administrative-Production Ratios in Organizations,"American Sociological Review, Vol. 37, 1972, pp. 149-153.
13.
Hickson, D. J., D. S. Pugh, and D. Pheysey, "Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1972, pp. 378-397.
14.
Indik, B. P., "The Relationship Between Organization Size and Supervision Ratio,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 9, 1964, pp. 301-312.
15.
Khandwalla, P. N., "Mass-Output Orientation of Operations Technology and Organizational Structure,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1973, pp. 74-97.
16.
Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).
17.
Parkinson, C. N., Parkinson's Law and Other Studies in Administration (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957).
18.
Pondy, L., "The Effects of Size, Complexity, and Ownership on Administrative Intensity."Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 14, 1969, pp. 47-60.
19.
Simmel, G., "The Number of Members as Determining the Sociological Form of the Group," Translated by A. W. Small, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 8, 1902-1903, pp. 1-46.
20.
Spencer, H., Principles of Sociology (New York: Appleton, Vol. I, 1889).
21.
Terreberry, S., "The Evolution of Organizational Environments,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 12,1968, pp. 590-613.
22.
Thompson, James D., Organizations in Action (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).
23.
Tosi, H., and H. Patt, "Administrative Ratios and Organizational Size,"Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 10, 1967, pp. 161-168.
24.
Woodward, J., Management and Technology, Problems of Progress in Industry, Series No. 3 (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1958).
