Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-2
Good Soldiers Instead of Good Change Agents: Examining the Dual Effects of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on Pro-Social Behavior and Change-Oriented Behavior in Teams
Previous research has predominantly regarded self-sacrificing leaders as role models that can drive desirable outcomes. We challenge this notion and demonstrate the dual effects of self-sacrificial leadership on team prosocial and change-oriented behaviors. Drawing upon social learning theory, we develop a nuanced model that simultaneously examines self-sacrificial leadership's beneficial effects on team helping and its detrimental effects on team change-oriented behavior via unique mechanisms. Our analysis of two time-lagged, multisource data revealed that self-sacrificial leadership has an indirect positive effect on team helping via team other-focus and an indirect negative effect on team change-oriented behaviors (i.e., team creativity and team proactivity) via team dependence on the leader. Furthermore, team leader competence amplifies these indirect effects, such that the effects are stronger for more competent leaders. Taken together, our research challenges the prevailing assumption that self-sacrificial leadership is always beneficial and calls for further attention to be paid to the unintended impacts of role model leaders.
AboramadanM.HamidZ.KundiY. M.El HamalawiE.2022. The effect of servant leadership on employees’ extra-role behaviors in NPOs: The role of work engagement. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/nml.21505
AndersonN.PotočnikK.ZhouJ.2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40: 1297‐1333.
4.
ArnoldK. A.LoughlinC.2010. Individually considerate transformational leadership behaviour and self-sacrifice. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31: 670‐686.
5.
BalwantP. T.2016. Transformational instructor-leadership in higher education teaching: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership Studies, 9: 20‐42.
6.
BanduraA.1973. Aggression: A social learning analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Press.
7.
BanduraA.1977. Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Press.
8.
BanduraA.1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Press.
9.
BanduraA.2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 1‐26.
10.
BanksG. C.McCauleyK. D.GardnerW. L.GulerC. E.2016. A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27: 634‐652.
BassB. M.StogdillR. M.1990. Handbook of leadership.New York, NY: Free Press.
13.
BecerraM.GuptaA. K.2003. Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14: 32‐44.
14.
Bergeron, D. M. 2007. The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32: 1078–1095.
15.
BindlU. K.ParkerS. K.2010. Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In ZedeckS. (Ed.) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 567‐598. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
16.
BlieseP. D.2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349‐381. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
17.
BriefA. P.MotowidloS. J.1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11: 710‐725.
18.
BrislinR. W.1986. The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (Eds.) Field methods in cross-cultural research: 137‐164. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 595‐616.
20.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.HarrisonD. A.2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 117‐134.
21.
BuengelerC.HomanA. C.VoelpelS. C.2016. The challenge of being a young manager: The effects of contingent reward and participative leadership on team-level turnover depend on leader age. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37: 1224‐1245.
CaiZ.ParkerS. K.ChenZ.LamW.2019. How does the social context fuel the proactive fire? A multilevel review and theoretical synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40: 209‐230.
24.
CampbellJ. Y.2000. Asset pricing at the millennium. The Journal of Finance, 55: 1515‐1567.
25.
ChanD.1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234‐246.
26.
ChenG.GogusC. I.2008. Motivation in and of work teams: A multilevel perspective. In KanferR.ChenG.PritchardR. D. (Eds.) Work motivation: Past, present, and future. The organizational frontiers series: 285‐318. New York: Routledge.
27.
ChengC. M.ChartrandT. L.2003. Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85: 1170‐1179.
28.
CheongM.SpainS. M.YammarinoF. J.YunS.2016. Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly, 27: 602‐616.
29.
ChoiJ. N.2009. Collective dynamics of citizenship behaviour: What group characteristics promote group-level helping?Journal of Management Studies, 46: 1396‐1420.
30.
ChoiY.Mai-DaltonR. R.1998. On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 9: 475‐501.
31.
ChoiY.Mai-DaltonR. R.1999. The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. The Leadership Quarterly, 10: 397‐421.
32.
CongerJ. A.1990. The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19: 44‐55.
33.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N.1998. Charismatic leadership in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
CrantJ. M.2000. Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26: 435‐462.
35.
CurcurutoM.GriffinM. A.2018. Prosocial and proactive “safety citizenship behaviour” (SCB): The mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership. Safety Science, 104: 29‐38.
36.
DavisT. R.LuthansF.1980. A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5: 281‐290.
37.
De CremerD.2006. Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 79‐93.
38.
De CremerD.van KnippenbergD.2004. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95: 140‐155.
39.
De CremerD.van KnippenbergD.2005. Cooperation as a function of leader self-sacrifice, trust, and identification. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26: 355‐369.
40.
De CremerD.MayerD. M.Van DijkeM.SchoutenB. C.BardesM.2009. When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 887‐899.
41.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A.Van KnippenbergD.2008. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12: 22‐49.
42.
DeinertA.HomanA. C.BoerD.VoelpelS. C.GutermannD.2015. Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders’ personality and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26: 1095‐1120.
43.
DeMarreeK. G.LoerschC.2009. Who am I and who are you? Priming and the influence of self versus other focused attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45: 440‐443.
44.
Den HartogD.N.BelschakF.D.2012. When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 194‐202.
45.
DietzJ.PughS. D.WileyJ. W.2004. Service climate effects on customer attitudes: An examination of boundary conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 81‐92.
46.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109: 573‐598.
47.
EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S.2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 1‐22.
48.
EffelsbergD.SolgaM.GurtJ.2014. Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120: 81‐93.
49.
EhrhartM. G.2004. Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57: 61‐94.
50.
EisenbeißS. A.BoernerS.2013. A double-edged sword: Transformational leadership and individual creativity. British Journal of Management, 24: 54‐68.
51.
FarhJ. L.LeeC.FarhC. I.2010. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1173‐1180.
52.
FarmerS. M.TierneyP.Kung-McIntyreK.2003. Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 616‐630.
53.
FarmerS. M.Van DyneL.KamdarD.2015. The contextualized self: How team–member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 583‐595.
54.
FeldmanD. C.1984. The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9: 47‐53.
55.
FreseM.FayD.HilburgerT.LengK.TagA.1997. The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70: 139‐161.
56.
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L.2013. The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7: 199‐216.
57.
GardnerD. G.1986. Activation theory and task design: An empirical test of several new predictions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 411‐418.
58.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J.1998. The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23: 32‐58.
59.
GovernJ. M.MarschL. A.2001. Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10: 366‐378.
60.
GrantA. M.SumanthJ. J.2009. Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 927‐944.
61.
GriffinM. A.NealA.ParkerS. K.2007. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 327‐347.
62.
HalversonS. K.HolladayC. L.KazamaS. M.QuiñonesM. A.2004. Self-sacrificial behavior in crisis situations: The competing roles of behavioral and situational factors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15: 263‐275.
63.
HarrisT. B.KirkmanB.2017. Teams and proactivity. In ParkerS. K.BindlU. K. (Eds.) Proactivity at work: 530‐558. Oxford, OX: Routledge Press.
64.
HeW.ZhouR. Y.LongL. R.HuangX.HaoP.2018. Self-sacrificial leadership and followers’ affiliative and challenging citizenship behaviors: A relational self-concept based study in China. Management and Organization Review, 14: 105‐133.
65.
HirstG.Van KnippenbergD.ZhouJ.2009. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 280‐293.
66.
HofstedeG.2001. Culture‘s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
67.
HoganR.KaiserR. B.2005. What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9: 169‐180.
68.
HollanderE. P.JulianJ. W.1970. Studies in leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology: 34‐69. New York, NY: Academic Press.
69.
HoogervorstN.De CremerD.van DijkeM.MayerD. M.2012. When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23: 883‐896.
70.
HowellJ. M.1988. Two faces of charisma: Socialized and personalized leadership in organizations. In CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (Eds.) The Jossey-Bass management series. Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness: 213‐236. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
71.
HuJ.ErdoganB.JiangK.BauerT. N.LiuS.2018. Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103: 313‐323.
72.
HuJ.LidenR. C.2015. Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1102‐1127.
73.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M.1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6: 1‐55.
74.
HülshegerU. R.AndersonN.SalgadoJ. F.2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1128‐1145.
75.
IliesR.WagnerD. T.MorgesonF. P.2007. Explaining affective linkages in teams: Individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism–collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1140‐1148.
76.
JamesL. R.1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219‐229.
77.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG.1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85‐98.
78.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.KosalkaT.2009. The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 855‐875.
79.
KarkR.2000. Gender differences in transformational leadership, followers’ identifications, and effects on followers’ perceptions. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.
80.
KarkR.ShamirB.ChenG.2003. The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 246‐255.
81.
KauppilaO. P.EhrnroothM.MäkeläK.SmaleA.SumeliusJ.VuorenmaaH.2022. Serving to help and helping to serve: Using servant leadership to influence beyond supervisory relationships. Journal of Management, 48: 764‐790.
82.
KehoeR. R.TzabbarD.2015. Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 709‐727.
83.
Kets de VriesM. F. R.1988. Prisoners of leadership. Human Relations, 41: 261‐280.
84.
Kets de VriesM. F. R.MillerD.1984. The neurotic organization: Diagnosing and changing counterproductive styles of management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
85.
KozlowskiS. W. J.KleinK. J.2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 3‐90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
86.
LathamG. P.SaariL. M.1979. Application of social-learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 239‐246.
87.
LeeC.FarhJ. L.2004. Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Applied Psychology, 53: 136‐154.
88.
LeeC.PillutlaM.LawK. S.2000. Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26: 685‐704.
89.
LiN.ChiaburuD. S.KirkmanB. L.2017. Cross-level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior: Organizational support climate as a double-edged sword. Journal of Management, 43: 1076‐1102.
90.
LiR.ZhangZ. Y.TianX. M.2016. Can self-sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37: 758‐781.
91.
LiY.LiN.LiC.LiJ.2020. The boon and bane of creative “stars”: A social network exploration of how and when team creativity is (and is not) driven by a star teammate. Academy of Management Journal, 63: 613‐635.
92.
LiaoH.ChuangA.JoshiA.2008. Perceived deep-level dissimilarity: Personality antecedents and impact on overall job attitude, helping, work withdrawal, and turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106: 106‐124.
93.
LidenR. C.WayneS. J.JaworskiR. A.BennettN.2004. Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30: 285‐304.
94.
MadjarN.OldhamG. R.PrattM. G.2002. There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and non-work creativity to support employee’s creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 757‐767.
95.
MalingumuW.StoutenJ.EuwemaM.BabyegeyaE.2016. Servant leadership, organisational citizenship behavior and creativity: The mediating role of team-member exchange. Psychologica Belgica, 56: 342‐356.
96.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P.Jr1981. Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 6: 105‐113.
97.
MarinovaS. V.PengC.LorinkovaN.Van DyneL.ChiaburuD.2015. Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88: 104‐120.
98.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A.2019. Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6: 17‐46.
99.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 123‐136.
100.
McAllisterD. J.KamdarD.MorrisonE. W.TurbanD. B.2007. Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1200‐1211.
101.
MorrisonE. W.2006. Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32: 5‐28.
102.
MorrisonE. W.PhelpsC. C.1999. Taking charge at work: Extra role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 403‐419.
103.
MostafaA. M. S.BottomleyP. A.2020. Self-sacrificial leadership and employee behaviours: An examination of the role of organizational social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 161: 641‐652.
104.
NgK. Y.Van DyneL.2005. Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups: A multilevel analysis. Group & Organization Management, 30: 514‐540.
105.
OhlyS.FritzC.2010. Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31: 543‐565.
106.
OldroydJ. B.MorrisS. S.2012. Catching falling stars: A human resource response to social capital’s detrimental effect of information overload on star employees. Academy of Management Review, 37: 396‐418.
OrganD. W.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.2006. Organizational citizenship behaviour: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
109.
OstroffC.KinickiA. J.ClarkM. A.2002. Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 355‐368.
110.
ParkerS. K.WilliamsH. M.TurnerN.2006. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 636‐652.
111.
PierroA.RavenB. H.AmatoC.BélangerJ. J.2013. Bases of social power, leadership styles, and organizational commitment. International Journal of Psychology, 48: 1122‐1134.
112.
PorterC. O.OutlawR.GaleJ. P.ChoT. S.2019. The use of online panel data in management research: A review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 45: 319‐344.
QinX.ChenC.YamK. C.HuangM.JuD.2020. The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105: 693‐712.
115.
RamusC. A.StegerU.2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 605‐626.
116.
RaverJ. L.EhrhartM. G.ChadwickI. C.2012. The emergence of team helping norms: Foundations within members’ attributes and behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 616‐637.
117.
SajonsG. B.2020. Estimating the causal effect of measured endogenous variables: A tutorial on experimentally randomized instrumental variables. The Leadership Quarterly, 31: 101348.
118.
SchaubroeckJ.LamS. S.ChaS. E.2007. Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1020‐1030.
119.
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. 2008. Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [computer software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org/
120.
ShalleyC. E.GilsonL. L.BlumT. C.2009. Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 489‐505.
121.
ShamirB.1991. The charismatic relationship: Alternative explanations and predictions. The Leadership Quarterly, 2: 81‐104.
122.
ShinS. J.ZhouJ.2007. When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1709‐1721.
123.
SliterM. T.SinclairR. R.YuanZ.MohrC. D.2014. Don’t fear the reaper: Trait death anxiety, mortality salience, and occupational health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 759‐769.
124.
StoverinkA. C.ChiaburuD. S.LiN.ZhengX.2018. Supporting team citizenship: The influence of team social resources on team-level affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 28: 201‐215.
125.
SturmR. E.VeraD.CrossanM.2017. The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28: 349‐366.
126.
ThompsonW. C.CowanC. L.RosenhanD. L.1980. Focus of attention mediates the impact of negative affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38: 291‐300.
127.
TourishD.2013. The dark side of transformational leadership: A critical perspective. Hove: Routledge Press.
128.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L.2000. Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
129.
Van DyneL.KamdarD.JoiremanJ.2008. In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1195‐1207.
130.
Van DyneL.LePineJ. A.1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 108‐119.
131.
Van KnippenbergB.van KnippenbergD.2005. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 25‐37.
132.
Van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B.2013. A critical assessment of charismatic–transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?Academy of Management Annals, 7(1): 1‐60.
133.
Van LangeP. A.AgnewC. R.HarinckF.SteemersG. E.1997. From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73: 1330‐1344.
134.
WangZ.XingL.XuH.HannahS. T.2021. Not all followers socially learn from ethical leaders: The roles of followers’ moral identity and leader identification in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 170: 449‐469.
135.
WilliamsH. M.ParkerS. K.TurnerN.2010. Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 301‐324.
136.
WuC. H.LiuJ.KwanH. K.LeeC.2016. Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 362‐378.
137.
WuC. H.ParkerS. K.2017. The role of leader support in facilitating proactive work behavior: A perspective from attachment theory. Journal of Management, 43: 1025‐1049.
138.
WuC. H.ParkerS. K.WuL. Z.LeeC.2018. When and why people engage in different forms of proactive behavior: Interactive effects of self-construals and work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 293‐323.
139.
WuC. H.WangZ.2015. How transformational leadership shapes team proactivity: The mediating role of positive affective tone and the moderating role of team task variety. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19: 137‐151.
140.
WuJ.LidenR. C.LiaoC.WayneS. J.2021. Does manager servant leadership lead to follower serving behaviors? It depends on follower self-interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106: 152‐167.
141.
YamK. C.ChristianM. S.WeiW.LiaoZ.NaiJ.2018. The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: Examining costs and benefits. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 348‐369.
142.
YoshidaD. T.SendjayaS.HirstG.CooperB.2014. Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 67: 1395‐1404.
143.
ZhangX.BartolK. M.2010. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process management. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 107‐128.
144.
ZhangX.LiaoH.LiN.ColbertA.2020. Playing it safe for my family: Exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 63: 1923‐1950.
145.
ZhouJ.HoeverI. J.2014. Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1: 333‐359.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
