Disciplinary advances are dependent on two intertwined pillars: refinements in theory and refinement in methods. Numerous guides exist for making a theoretical contribution, yet mystery surrounds what exactly constitutes a methodological contribution. Our goal is to eliminate, or at least significantly reduce, this mystery. We draw on decades of collective experiences as authors, reviewers, and editors of methodologically oriented inquiry to offer insights about how to develop and evaluate methodological contributions worthy of publication in premier management journals. We provide a typology of different kinds of methodological advancements, describe contributions across a method's life cycle phases, and provide recommendations for avoiding common mistakes in developing and publishing papers that offer a methodological contribution. In doing so, we consider works whose methodological contributions are their sole source of value added as well as empirical studies that have a methodological contribution as one of multiple sources of value added.
AguinisH.VillamorI.RamaniR. S. 2021. MTurk research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management,47: 823–837.
2.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. 2011. Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review,36: 247–271.
3.
BagozziR. P.YiY.PhillipsL. W. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly,36: 421–458.
4.
BerghD. D. 1993. Watch the time carefully: The use and misuse of time effects in management research. Journal of Management,19: 683–705.
5.
BerghD. D. 1995. Problems with repeated measures analysis: Demonstration with a study of the diversification and performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal,38: 1692–1708.
6.
BerghD. D.AguinisH.HeaveyC.KetchenD. J.BoydB. K.SuP.JooH. 2016. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal,37: 477–497.
7.
BerghD. D.HolbeinG. F. 1997. Assessment and redirection of longitudinal analysis demonstration with a study of the diversification and divestiture relationship. Strategic Management Journal,18: 557–571.
BettisR. A.HelfatC. E.ShaverJ. M. 2016. The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal,37: 2193–2203.
10.
BiehlM.KimH.WadeM. 2006. Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega,34: 359–371.
11.
BlieseP. D.SchepkerD. J.EssmanS. M.PloyhartR. E. 2020. Bridging methodological divides between macro- and microresearch: Endogeneity and methods for panel data. Journal of Management,46: 70–99.
12.
BoydB. K.HaynesK. T.HittM. A.BerghD. D.KetchenD. J. 2012. Contingency hypotheses in strategic management: Use, disuse, or misuse. Journal of Management,38: 278–313.
13.
CertoS. T.WithersM. C.SemadeniM. 2017. A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within-and between-firm effects. Strategic Management Journal,38: 1536–1556.
14.
DulJ. 2016a. Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research,69: 1516–1523.
15.
DulJ. 2016b. Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods,19: 10–52.
16.
DulJ.2019. Conducting necessary condition analysis for business and management students mastering business research methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
17.
DulJ.HakT.GoertzG.VossC. 2010. Necessary condition hypotheses in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,30: 1170–1190.
18.
DulJ.van der LaanE.KuikR. 2020. A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis. Organizational Research Methods,23: 385–395.
19.
DulJ.van der LaanE.KuikR.KarwowskiM. 2019. Necessary condition analysis: Type I error, power, and over-interpretation of test results. A reply to a comment on NCA. Commentary: Predicting the significance of necessity. Frontiers in Psychology,10: 1–2.
20.
DulJ.VisB.GoertzG. 2021. Necessary condition analysis (NCA) does exactly what it should do when applied properly: A reply to a comment on NCA. Sociological Methods & Research,50: 926–936.
21.
DuriauV. J.RegerR. K.PfarrerM. D. 2007. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies. Organizational Research Methods,10: 5–34.
22.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods,16: 15–31.
23.
GoldfarbB.KingA. A. 2016. Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference. Strategic Management Journal,37: 167–176.
24.
Gonzalez-MuléE.AguinisH. 2018. Advancing theory by assessing boundary conditions with metaregression: A critical review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management,44: 2246–2273.
25.
HeckmanJ. J. 1979. Sample selection as a specification error. Econometrica,47: 153–161.
26.
HillA. D.JohnsonS. G.GrecoL. M.O’Boyle ErnestH.WalterS. L. 2021. Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management,47: 105–143.
27.
KetchenD. J.ShookC. L. 1996. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal,17: 441–458.
28.
KöhlerT.SmithA.BhakooV. 2022. Templates in qualitative research methods: Origins, limitations, and new directions. Organizational Research Methods, 25: 183-210.
29.
KuhnT. S.1996. The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
McNeishD. 2018. Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods,23: 412–433.
31.
Mees-BussJ.WelchC.PiekkariR. 2022. From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 25: 405-429.
32.
MeyerA. D. 1991. What is strategy’s distinctive competence?Journal of Management,17: 821–833.
33.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. 2016. Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences. Organizational Research Methods,19: 159–203.
34.
PrattM. G.SonensheinS.FeldmanM. S. 2022. Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25: 211-238
35.
RichterN. F.SchubringS.HauffS.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. 2020. When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA. Industrial Management & Data Systems,120: 2243–2267.
36.
RinkD. R.SwanJ. E. 1979. Product life cycle research: A literature review. Journal of Business Research,7: 219–242.
37.
ShaverJ. M. 1998. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival?Management Science,44: 571–585.
38.
ShaverM. J. 2020. Causal identification through a cumulative body of research in the study of strategy and organizations. Journal of Management,46: 1244–1256.
39.
ShaverJ. M.2021. Evolution of quantitative research methods in strategic management. In DuhaimeI.HittM. A.LylesM. A. (Eds.), Strategic management: State of the field and its future:83–98. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
ShookC.KetchenD. J.HultG. T.KacmarK. M. 2004. An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal,25: 397–404.
41.
SorjonenK.AlexJ. W.MelinB. 2017. Necessity as a function of skewness. Frontiers in Psychology,8: 1–4.
42.
SorjonenK.MelinB. 2019. Predicting the significance of necessity. Frontiers in Psychology,10: 1–5.
43.
SpectorP. E.RosenC. C.RichardsonH. A.WilliamsL. J.JohnsonR. E. 2017. A new perspective on method variance: A measure-centric approach. Journal of Management,45: 855–880.
44.
ThiemA. 2021. The logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient causality”: A comment on necessary condition analysis (NCA). Sociological Methods & Research,50: 913–925.
45.
UpsonJ. W.KetchenD. J.ConnellyB. L.RanftA. L. 2012. Competitor analysis and foothold moves. Academy of Management Journal,55: 93–110.
46.
VisB.DulJ. 2018. Analyzing relationships of necessity not just in kind but also in degree: Complementing fsQCA with NCA. Sociological Methods & Research,47: 872–899.
