Social dominance orientation (SDO) is a widely researched construct that indexes a preference for hierarchical intergroup relations. However, it remains unclear whether this preference (a) motivates people to seek out occupations that enhance hierarchical relations between groups (i.e., occupational assortment), (b) develops as a result of working within hierarchy-enhancing occupations (i.e., occupational socialization), or (c) both. One reason for this gap is that the large-scale longitudinal data required to simultaneously model assortment and socialization processes are scarce. In this study, we analyzed data from two waves of longitudinal data (spaced either 1, 3, or 5 years apart) from a nationwide sample of adults (N = 3,452–4,412) who were already working in either hierarchy-enhancing occupations (e.g., law enforcement) or hierarchy-attenuating occupations (e.g., social work). Results showed that SDO predicted an increased probability of working in a hierarchy-enhancing occupation 3 and 5 years later. Working in a hierarchy-enhancing occupation was also positively associated with SDO after 1 and 5 years. These patterns generally suggest that occupations both shape, and are shaped by, intergroup beliefs.
AdachiP.WilloughbyT.2015. Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12: 116-128.
2.
AltemeyerB.1996. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
AntebyM.ChanC. K.DiBenignoJ.2016. Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 183-244.
BapujiH.ErtugG.ShawJ. D.2019. Organizations and societal economic inequality: A review and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 14: 60-91.
7.
BapujiH.PatelC.ErtugG.AllenD. G.2020. Corona crisis and inequality: Why management research needs a societal turn. Journal of Management, 46: 1205-1222.
8.
BauerT. N.GreenS. G.1998. Testing the combined effects of newcomer information seeking and manager behavior on socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 72-83.
9.
BechkyB. A.2011. Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations, and negotiated orders. Organization Science, 22: 1157-1167.
10.
BergmanM. E.JeanV. A.2016. Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial-organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9: 84-113.
11.
BernerthJ. B.AguinisH. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69: 229-283.
12.
BollenK. A.1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
13.
BradfordJ.ReisnerS. L.HonnoldJ. A.XavierJ.2013. Experiences of transgender-related discrimination and implications for health: Results from the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study. American Journal of Public Health, 103: 1820-1829.
CampbellM. R.BrauerM. in press. Is discrimination widespread? Testing assumptions about bias on a university campus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000983
16.
CarnevaleA. P.RoseS. J.CheahB. 2011. The college payoff: Education, occupations, lifetime earnings. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
17.
CarnevaleJ. B.HatakI.2020. Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116: 183-187.
CialdiniR.LiY. J.SamperA.WellmanN.2019. How bad apples promote bad barrels: Unethical leader behavior and the selective attrition effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 168: 1-20.
CohnA.FehrE.MaréchalM. A.2014. Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, 516: 86-89.
24.
Cooper-ThomasH. D.Van VianenA.AndersonN.2004. Changes in person–organization fit: The impact of socialization tactics on perceived and actual P-O fit. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13: 52-78.
25.
Cooper-ThomasH. D.WrightS.2013. Person-environment misfit: The neglected role of social context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28: 21-37.
26.
DambrunM.GuimondS.DuarteS.2002. The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs. attenuating academic major on stereotyping: The mediating role of perceived social norm. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7: 114-136.
27.
DambrunM.KamiejskiR.HaddadiN.DuarteS.2009. Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of “geneticism.”European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 88-100.
28.
De CoomanR.De GieterS.PepermansR.HermansS.Du BoisC.CaersR.JegersM. (2009). Person–organization fit: Testing socialization and attraction–selection–attrition hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74: 102-107.
29.
DeLucaK. M.LawsonS.SunY.2012. Occupy Wall Street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5: 483-509.
30.
DiStefanoC.MotlR. W.2006. Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13: 440-464.
31.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E.2006. The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18: 192-203.
32.
DormannC.GriffinM. A.2015. Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20: 489-505.
33.
DuckittJ.2001. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 33: 41-113. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6.
34.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G.2017. The dual process motivational model of prejudice. In BarlowF. K.SibleyC. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice: 188-221.
35.
DunlopP. D.LeeK.2004. Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 67-80.
36.
EidM.2000. A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65: 241-261.
GattoJ.DambrunM.KerbratC.De OliveiraP.2010. Prejudice in the police: On the processes underlying the effects of selection and group socialisation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 252-269.
39.
GeiserC.EidM.NussbeckF. W.2008. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C (M-1) model: A comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological Methods, 13: 49-57.
40.
GoffP. A.LloydT.GellerA.RaphaelS.GlaserJ.2016. The science of justice: Race, arrests, and police use of force. Retrieved from http://policingequity.org/research/1687-2.
41.
GötzF.GoslingS.RentfrowJ. in press. Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hzrxf.
42.
GrayB.Kish-GephartJ. J.2013. Encountering social class differences at work: How “class work” perpetuates inequality. Academy of Management Review, 38: 670-699.
43.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A.2015. Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108: 553-561.
44.
GuimondS.DambrunM.MichinovN.DuarteS.2003. Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 697-721.
45.
HaleyH.SidaniusJ.2005. Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8: 187-203.
46.
HaydukL. A.1987. Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
47.
HenryP. J.SearsD. O.2009. The crystallization of contemporary racial prejudice across the lifespan. Political Psychology, 30: 569-590.
48.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.. . . StewartA. L.2015. The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109: 1003-1028.
49.
HollandJ. L.1959. A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6: 35-45.
50.
HoofsH.van de SchootR.JansenN. W.KantI.2018. Evaluating model fit in Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis with large samples: Simulation study introducing the BRMSEA. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78: 537-568.
51.
HoukamauC. A.SibleyC. G.2015. Looking Māori predicts decreased rates of home ownership: Institutional racism in housing based on perceived appearance. PLoS One, 10: e0118540.
52.
HuC.CheungG. W.2008. Eight general questions on measurement equivalence/invariance that bother me most. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2008: 1-6.
53.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M.1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6: 1-55.
54.
HudsonS. K. T. J.CikaraM.SidaniusJ.2019. Preference for hierarchy is associated with reduced empathy and increased counter-empathy towards others, especially outgroup targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85: 103871. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103871
55.
KhanA. K.MossS.QuratulainS.HameedI.2018. When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Management, 44: 2801-2826.
56.
KimT. Y.CableD. M.KimS. P.2005. Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 232-241.
57.
KingE. B.ShapiroJ. R.HeblM. R.SingletaryS. L.TurnerS.2006. The stigma of obesity in customer service: A mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 579-593.
58.
Kish-GephartJ. J.HarrisonD. A.TreviñoL. K.2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1-31.
59.
KteilyN. S.SidaniusJ.LevinS.2011. Social dominance orientation: Cause or “mere effect”? Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47: 208-214.
60.
LarsonL. M.RottinghausP. J.BorgenF. H.2002. Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61: 217-239.
61.
LittleT. D.PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P.CardN. A.2007. New developments in latent panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31: 357-365.
62.
LucasC. J.2006. American higher education: A history. Berlin: Springer.
63.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F.NagengastB.2010. Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22: 366-381.
64.
MarsmanM.WagenmakersE. J.2017. Three insights from a Bayesian interpretation of the one-sided P value. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77: 529-539.
65.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. H. R.2002. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7: 64-82.
66.
MuheljicA.DraceS.2018. University socialization and the acceptance of anti-egalitarian ideology: The underlying role of extrinsic life goals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48: O73-O80.
NicolA. A.CharbonneauD.BoiesK.2007. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in a Canadian military sample. Military Psychology, 19: 239-257.
71.
OfosuE. K.ChambersM. K.ChenJ. M.HehmanE.2019. Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116: 8846-8851.
72.
OsborneD.SatherleyN.LittleT. D.SibleyC. G. in press. Authoritarianism and social dominance predict annual increases in generalized prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620969608.
73.
OsborneD.SearsD. O.ValentinoN. A.2011. The end of the solidly Democratic South: The impressionable-years hypothesis. Political Psychology, 32: 81-108.
74.
PascarellaE. T.EdisonM.NoraA.HagedornL. S.TerenziniP. T.1996. Influences on students’ openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college. Journal of Higher Education, 67: 174-195.
75.
PetersonB. E.LaneM. D.2001. Implications of authoritarianism for young adulthood: Longitudinal analysis of college experiences and future goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 678-690.
76.
PrattoF.EspinozaP.2001. Gender, ethnicity, and power. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 763-780.
77.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS.2006. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17: 271-320.
78.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F.1994. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 741-763.
79.
PrattoF.StallworthL. M.SidaniusJ.SiersB.1997. The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 37-53.
80.
RobinsonJ. K.2002. Race, gender, and familial status: Discrimination in one US mortgage lending market. Feminist Economics, 8: 63-85.
81.
RohrerJ. M.2018. Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1: 27-42.
82.
SatherleyN.MilojevP.GreavesL. M.HuangY.OsborneD.BulbuliaJ.SibleyC. G.2015. Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New Zealand attitudes and values study. PLoS One, 10: e0121950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121950.
83.
SchneiderB.1987. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40: 437-453.
84.
SeligJ. P.LittleT. D.2012. Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods: 265-278. New York: Guilford Press.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ.2008. Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12: 248-279.
87.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ.2007. Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33: 160-172.
88.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.SinclairS.Van LaarC.1996. Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices. Social Justice Research, 9: 145-170.
89.
SidaniusJ.CotterillS.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.KteilyN.CarvachoH.2017. Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice: 149-187. New York: Cambridge University Press.
90.
SidaniusJ.LiuJ. H.ShawJ. S.PrattoF.1994. Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24: 338-366.
91.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.1999. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
92.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.2001. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
93.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.2003. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 42: 207-213.
94.
SidaniusJ.van LaarC.LevinS.SinclairS.2003. Social hierarchy maintenance and assortment into social roles: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6: 333-352.
95.
SimmonsA. L.WatkinsM. B.UmphressE. E.2015. Are male tokens bad for females? The effect of social dominance orientation on high-status tokens’ evaluations of low-status members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45: 55-66.
96.
SinclairS.SidaniusJ.LevinS.1998. The interface between ethnic and social system attachment: The differential effects of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating environments. Journal of Social Issues, 54: 741-757.
97.
Son HingL. S.BobocelD. R.ZannaM. P.McBrideM. V. 2007. Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 67-81.
ThomsenL.GreenE. G.HoA. K.LevinS.van LaarC.SinclairS.SidaniusJ.2010. Wolves in sheep’s clothing: SDO asymmetrically predicts perceived ethnic victimization among White and Latino students across three years. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36: 225-238.
100.
TylerT. R.2006. Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
UmphressE. E.SimmonsA. L.BoswellW. R.TrianaM. D. C.2008. Managing discrimination in selection: The influence of directives from an authority and social dominance orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 982-993.
103.
UmphressE. E.Smith-CroweK.BriefA. P.DietzJ.WatkinsM. B.2007. When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 396-409.
104.
UnzuetaM. M.KnowlesE. D.HoG. C.2012. Diversity is what you want it to be: How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity. Psychological Science, 23: 303-309.
105.
VallasS.CumminsE.2014. Relational models of organizational inequalities: Emerging approaches and conceptual dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 58: 228-255.
106.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E.2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 4-70.
107.
Van AssenM. A.van AertR.WichertsJ. M. 2015. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies. Psychological Methods, 20: 293-309.
108.
Van LaarC.SidaniusJ.RabinowitzJ. L.SinclairS. 1999. The three Rs of academic achievement: Reading,’riting, and racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 136-148.
109.
Van MaanenJ. E.ScheinE. H. 1977. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 1: 209-265.
110.
Van VianenA. E. 2018. Person–environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5: 75-101.
111.
VerquerM. L.BeehrT. A.WagnerS. H.2003. A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 473-489.
112.
VogelR. M.RodellJ. B.LynchJ. W.2016. Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1561-1584.
WestonS. J.RitchieS. J.RohrerJ. M.PrzybylskiA. K.2019. Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2: 214-227.
ZyphurM. J.OswaldF. L.2015. Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41: 390-420.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
