After reviewing the various ways employee recovery from work has been conceptualized in existing literature as well as the predominant theoretical frameworks used to study recovery, we meta-analyze the relationships between employee recovery, demands, resources, well-being, and performance. We also quantitatively examine the conceptualizations of recovery as activities, experiences, or states in terms of both their intercorrelations and differing effects with demands, resources, well-being, and performance. Results of meta-analyses using a total of 198 empirical samples indicated general support for the hypothesized positive relationships between employee recovery and resources, well-being, and performance as well as a negative relationship with demands. However, the size and consistency of observed effects differed markedly based on the conceptualization utilized. Additionally, various conceptualizations of recovery were shown to be only modestly related, while recovery experiences and the state of being recovered were shown to have substantial temporal consistency. Implications of these findings for scholars studying recovery and practitioners are discussed.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.WrightT. A.2011. Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32: 1033-1043.
2.
AustinJ. T.VillanovaP.1992. The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 836-874.
3.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.2007. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22: 309-328.
4.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.EuwemaM. C.2005. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10: 170-180.
5.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.VerbekeW.2004. Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resources Management, 43: 83-104.
6.
BakkerA. B.HakanenJ. J.DemeroutiE.XanthopoulouD.2007. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99: 274-284.
7.
BealD. J.WeissH. M.BarrosE.MacDermidS. M.2005. An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1054-1068.
8.
BennettA. A.BakkerA. B.FieldJ. G.2018. Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39: 262-275.
9.
BennettA. A.GabrielA. S.CalderwoodC.DahlingJ. J.TrougakosJ. P.2016. Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 1635-1654.
10.
BerryC. M.OnesD. S.SackettP. R.2007. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 410-424.
11.
BinnewiesC.SonnentagS.MojzaE. J.2009. Daily performance at work: Feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 67-93.
12.
BinnewiesC.SonnentagS.MojzaE. J.2010. Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: A week-level study examining intra-individual relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 419-441.
13.
BonoJ. E.GlombT. M.ShenW.KimE.KochA. J.2013. Building positive resources: Effects of positive events and positive reflection on work stress and health. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1601-1627.
14.
CalderwoodC.GabrielA. S.RosenC. C.SimonL. S.KoopmanJ.2016. 100 years running: The need to understand why employee physical activity benefits organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37: 1104-1109.
15.
ChamblessD. L.HollonS. D.1998. Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66: 7-18.
16.
CrawfordE. R.LePineJ. A.RichB. L.2010. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 834-848.
17.
DavidsonO. B.EdenD.WestmanM.Cohen-CharashY.HammerL. B.KlugerA. N.SpectorP. E.2010. Sabbatical leave: Who gains and how much?Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 953-964.
18.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.GeurtsS. A. E.TarisT. W.2009. Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. In SonnentagS.PerrewéP. L.GansterD. C. (Eds.), Current perspectives on job-stress recovery, Vol. 7: 85-123. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
19.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B.2001. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 499-512.
20.
DettmersJ.Vahle-HinzT.BambergE.FriedrichN.KellerM.2016. Extended work availability and its relation with start-of-day mood and cortisol. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21: 105-118.
21.
DiazI.ChiaburuD. S.ZimmermanR. D.BoswellW. R.2012. Communication technology: Pros and cons of constant connection to work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80: 500-508.
22.
EdwardsJ. R.RothbardN. P.2000. Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25: 178-199.
23.
EschlemanK. J.MadsenJ.AlarconG.BarelkaA.2014. Benefiting from creative activity: The positive relationships between creative activity, recovery experiences, and performance-related outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87: 579-598.
24.
EtzionD.EdenD.LapidotY.1998. Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 577-585.
25.
FritzC.SonnentagS.2005. Recovery, health, and job performance: Effects of weekend experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10: 187-199.
26.
FritzC.SonnentagS.2006. Recovery, well-being, and performance-related outcomes: The role of workload and vacation experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 936-945.
27.
FritzC.YankelevichM.ZarubinA.BargerP.2010. Happy, healthy, and productive: The role of detachment from work during nonwork time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 977-983.
28.
GabrielA. S.PodsakoffN. P.BealD. J.ScottB. A.SonnentagS.TrougakosJ. P.ButtsM. M.2018. Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626
29.
GansterD. C.RosenC. C.2013. Work stress and employee health: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 39: 1085-1122.
30.
GeurtsS. A.SonnentagS.2006. Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32: 482-492.
31.
GoodD. J.LyddyC. J.GlombT. M.BonoJ. E.BrownK.W.DuffyM. K.. . . LazarS. W.2016. Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 42: 114-142.
32.
GustafssonK.LindforsP.AronssonG.LundbergU.2008. Relationships between self-rating of recovery from work and morning salivary cortisol. Journal of Occupational Health, 50: 24-30.
33.
HahnV. C.BinnewiesC.SonnentagS.MojzaE. J.2011. Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16: 202-216.
34.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.NeveuJ.-P.Paustian-UnderdahlS. C.WestmanM.2014. Getting to the “COR”: understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40: 1334-1364.
35.
HalbeslebenJ. R.WheelerA. R.Paustian-UnderdahlS. C.2013. The impact of furloughs on emotional exhaustion, self-rated performance, and recovery experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 492-503.
36.
HobfollS. E.1989. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44: 513-524.
37.
HobfollS. E.2002. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6: 307-324.
38.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ. P.WestmanM.2018. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5: 103-128.
39.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L.2004. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E.ErezA.LockeE. A.2005. Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 257-268.
41.
KepesS.BanksG. C.OhI. S.2014. Avoiding bias in publication bias research: The value of “null” findings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29: 183-203.
42.
KimS.ParkY.NiuQ.2017. Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38: 28-44.
43.
KinnunenU.FeldtT.SianojaM.de BloomJ.KorpelaK.GeurtsS.2017. Identifying long-term patterns of work-related rumination: Associations with job demands and well-being outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26: 514-526.
44.
KinnunenU.FeldtT.SiltaloppiM.SonnentagS.2011. Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20: 805-832.
45.
KirchmeyerC.2000. Work-life initiatives: Greed or benevolence regarding workers’ time? In CooperC. L.RousseauD. M. (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 7. Time in organizational behavior: 79-93. New York: Wiley.
46.
LanajK.JohnsonR. E.BarnesC. M.2014. Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124: 11-23.
47.
LeBretonJ. M.SchererK. T.JamesL. R.2014. Corrections for criterion reliability in validity generalization: A false prophet in a land of suspended judgment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7: 478-500.
48.
LuthansF.AveyJ. B.PateraJ. L.2008. Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7: 209-221.
49.
McCormickB. W.ReevesC. J.DownesP. E.LiN.IliesR.2018. Scientific contributions of within-person research in management: Making the juice worth the squeeze. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318788435
50.
McEwenB. S.StellarE.1993. Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153: 2093-2101.
51.
MeijmanT. F.MulderG.1998. Psychological aspects of workload. In DrenthP. J.ThierryH.de WolffC. J. (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology, 2nd ed.: 5-33. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
52.
MichelA.TurgutS.HoppeA.SonntagK.2016. Challenge and threat emotions as antecedents of recovery experiences: Findings from a diary study with blue-collar workers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25: 674-689.
53.
MojzaE. J.SonnentagS.BornemannC.2011. Volunteer work as a valuable leisure-time activity: A day-level study on volunteer work, non-work experiences, and well-being at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84: 123-152.
54.
NewmanD. B.TayL.DienerE.2014. Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15: 555-578.
55.
OerlemansW. G. M.BakkerA. B.2014. Burnout and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19: 303-314.
56.
OhI.-S.WangG.MountM. K.2011. Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 762-773.
57.
ParkY.FritzC.2015. Spousal recovery support, recovery experiences, and life satisfaction crossover among dual-earner couples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 557-566.
58.
ParkY.FritzC.JexS. M.2018. Daily cyber incivility and distress: The moderating roles of resources at work and home. Journal of Management, 44: 2535-2557.
59.
PeetersM. C.MontgomeryA. J.BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B.2005. Balancing work and home: How job and home demands are related to burnout. International Journal of Stress Management, 12: 43-61.
RichardsonK. M.2017. Managing employee stress and wellness in the new millennium. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22: 423-428.
62.
RikettaM.2008. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 472-481.
63.
Rodriguez-MuñozA.Sanz-VergelA. I.DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.2012. Reciprocal relationships between job demands, job resources, and recovery opportunities. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11: 86-94.
64.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E.2015. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SchmidtF. L.LeH.2004. Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods [Computer software]. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management and Organizations.
66.
ShimazuA.De JongeJ.KubotaK.KawakamiN.2014. Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: Predictive role of work and non-work factors in Japanese employees. Industrial Health, 52: 141-146.
67.
ShimazuA.SonnentagS.KubotaK.KawakamiN.2012. Validation of the Japanese version of the recovery experience questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health, 54: 196-205.
68.
ShorterE.1994. From the mind into the body: The cultural origins of psychosomatic symptoms. New York: Free Press.
69.
SitzmannT.YeoG.2013. A meta-analytic investigation of the within-person self-efficacy domain: Is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance?Personnel Psychology, 66: 531-568.
70.
SonnentagS.2001. Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6: 196-210.
71.
SonnentagS.2003. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 518-528.
72.
SonnentagS.ArbeusH.MahnC.FritzC.2014. Exhaustion and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time: Moderator effects of time pressure and leisure experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19: 206-216.
73.
SonnentagS.BayerU. V.2005. Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10: 393-414.
74.
SonnentagS.BinnewiesC.MojzaE. J.2008. “Did you have a nice evening?” A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep, and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 674-684.
75.
SonnentagS.BinnewiesC.MojzaE. J.2010. Staying well and engaged when demands are high: The role of psychological detachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 965-976.
76.
SonnentagS.FritzC.2007. The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12: 204-221.
77.
SonnentagS.FritzC.2015. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36: 72-103.
78.
SonnentagS.GeurtsS. A. E.2009. Methodological issues in recovery research. In SonnentagS.PerrewéP. L.GansterD. C. (Eds.), Current perspectives on job-stress recovery: 1-36. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
79.
SonnentagS.KruelU.2006. Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15: 197-217.
80.
SonnentagS.MojzaE. J.DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.2012. Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 842-853.
81.
SonnentagS.NatterE.2004. Flight attendants’ daily recovery from work: Is there no place like home?International Journal of Stress Management, 11: 366-391.
82.
SonnentagS.UngerD.RotheE.2016. Recovery and the work–family interface. In AllenT. D.EbyI. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family: 95-108. New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
SonnentagS.VenzL.CasperA.2017. Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next?. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22: 365-380.
84.
SonnentagS.ZijlstraF. R. H.2006. Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 330-350.
85.
SwiderB.ZimmermanR.2010. Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76: 487-506.
86.
ten BrummelhuisL. L.BakkerA. B. 2012. Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17: 445-455.
87.
ten BrummelhuisL. L.TrougakosJ. P. 2014. The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off-job activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87: 177-199.
88.
TrougakosJ. P.HidegI.ChengB. H.BealD. J.2014. Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 405-421.
89.
van WijheC.PeetersM.SchaufeliW.OuweneelE. 2013. Rise and shine: Recovery experiences of workaholic and nonworkaholic employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22: 476-489.
90.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S.SchmidtF. L.1996. Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 557-574.
91.
von ThieleU.LindforsP.LundbergU. 2006. Self-rated recovery from work stress and allostatic load in women. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61: 237-242.
92.
WanousJ. P.HudyM. J.2001. Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4: 361-375.
93.
WendscheJ.Lohmann-HaislahA.2017. A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 2072.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
