Drawing on a collective learning perspective, we theorized and tested how and when high-performance work practices are likely to enhance organizational creativity. Using a sample of 454 Korean companies across 16 industries in manufacturing, service, and banking areas, with time-lagged and multisource data, we found that high-performance work practices led to more organizational creativity when the companies underwent organizational change. We also found that the employees’ collective learning mediated the interaction effect of high-performance work practices and organizational change on organizational creativity. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
AndersonN.PotočnikK.ZhouJ.2014. Innovation and creativity in organization: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40: 1297-1333.
3.
AndersonP.1999. Complexity theory and organizational science. Organization Science, 10: 216-232.
4.
BaeJ.LawlerJ. J.2000. Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 502-517.
5.
BarneyJ.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
6.
BartunekJ. M.1984. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 355-372.
7.
BirkinshawJ.HamelG.MolM. J.2008. Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33: 825-845.
8.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M.1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1-34.
9.
BurkeW. W.LitwinG. H.1992. A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18: 523-545.
10.
BurnsT.StalkerG. M.1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Institute.
11.
ChangS.GongY.WayS. A.JiaL.2013. Flexibility-oriented HRM systems, absorptive capacity, and market responsiveness and firm innovativeness. Journal of Management, 39: 1924-1951.
12.
ChangS.JiaL.TakeuchiR.CaiY. 2014. Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 665-680.
13.
ChiangY.-H.HsuC.-C.ShihH-.A.2015. Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance. Asia Pacific Journal Management, 32: 531-549.
14.
ColbertB. A.2004. The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29: 341-358.
15.
CollinsC. J.SmithK. G.2006. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 544-560.
16.
CrossanM. M.LaneH. W.WhiteR. E.1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24: 522-537.
17.
DamanpourF.1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 555-590.
18.
DaneE.2010. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35: 579-603.
19.
DanielW. W.1987. Workplace industrial relations and technical change. London: Frances Pinter and Policy Studies Institute.
20.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A.BechtoldtM. N.BaasM. 2011. Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5: 81-89.
21.
DrazinR.GlynnM. A.KazanjianR. K.1999. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24: 286-307.
22.
EdmondsonA.1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.
23.
EvansW. R.DavisV. D.2005. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31: 758-775.
24.
GantJ.IchniowskiC.ShawK.2002. Social capital and organizational change in high-involvement and traditional work organizations. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11: 289-328.
25.
GeorgeJ. M.2007. Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1: 439-477.
26.
GuptaA. K.SmithK. G.ShalleyC. E.2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 693-706.
27.
HargadonA. B.BechkyB. A.2006. When collections of creative become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17: 484-500.
28.
HausmanJ. A.HallB. H.GrilichesZ.1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52: 909-938.
29.
HayesA. F.2015. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50: 1-22.
30.
HirstG.KnippenbergD. V.ZhouJ.2009. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 280-293.
31.
HowkinsJ.2001. The creative economy: How people make money from ideas. London: Penguin.
32.
HuselidM.1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635-672.
33.
IsabellaL. A.1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 7-41.
34.
KangS.-C.MorrisS. S.SnellS. A.2007. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32: 236-256.
35.
KhannaT.SongJ.LeeK.2011. The paradox of Samsung’s rise. Harvard Business Review, 89(7-8): 142-147.
36.
LadoA. A.WilsonM. C.1994. Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19: 699-727.
37.
LangerakF.HultinkE. J.RobbenH. S. J.2007. The mediating role of new product development in the link between market orientation and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 15: 281-305.
38.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L.2008. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 815-852.
39.
LichtensteinB. B.2000. Self-organized transitions: A pattern amid the chaos of transformative change. Academy of Management Executive, 14: 128-141.
40.
LiuD.GongY.ZhouJ.HuangJ. C.2016. Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0230
41.
LongJ. S.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MacDuffieJ. P.1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial Labor Relation Review, 48: 197-221.
43.
MaitlisS.SonensheinS. 2010. Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47: 551-580.
44.
MarchJ. G.1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
45.
MarionR.2012. Leadership of creativity: Entity-based, relational, and complexity perspectives. In MumfordM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity: 457-479. London: Academic Press.
46.
Martínez-SánchezA.Vela-JiménezM.Pérez-PérezM.De-Luis-CarnicerP.2009. Inter-organizational cooperation and environmental change: Moderating effects between flexibility and innovation performance. British Journal of Management, 20: 537-561.
47.
Martínez-SánchezA.Vela-JiménezM.Pérez-PérezM.De-Luis-CarnicerP.2011. The dynamics of labour flexibility: Relationships between employment type and innovativeness. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 715-736.
48.
OldhamG. R.CummingsA.1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 607-634.
49.
PatelP. C.MessersmithJ. G.LepakD. P.2013. Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between high performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1420-1442.
50.
PloyhartR. E.MoliternoT. P.2011. Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36: 127-150.
51.
PodolnyJ. M.1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458-483.
52.
PosthumaR. A.CampionM. C.MasimovaM.CampionM. A. 2013. A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39: 1184-1220.
53.
ProbstT. M.StewartS. M.GruysM. L.TierneyB. W.2007. Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational Organization Psychology, 80: 479-497.
54.
QuinnR. E.2004. Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
55.
RomanelliE.TushmanM. L.1994. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1141-1166.
56.
SchillingM. A.PhelpsC. C.2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53: 1113-1126.
57.
SchulerR. S.JacksonS. E.1987. Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1: 207-219.
58.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J.2008. Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://quatpsy.org/
59.
ShalleyC. E.ZhouJ.OldhamG. R.2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management, 30: 933-958.
60.
ShiptonH.WestM. A.DawsonJ.BirdiK.PattersonM.2006. HRM as a predictor of innovation. Human Resource Management Journal, 16: 3-27.
61.
SnowC. C.SnellS. A.1993. Staffing as strategy. In SchmittN.BormanW. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 448-479. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
SobelM. E.1982. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In LeinhartS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology: 290-312. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63.
SpreitzerG. M.1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 483-504.
64.
StaceyR. D.1996. Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
65.
SubramaniamM.YoundtM. A.2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 450-463.
VuongQ.1989. Likelihood ratio test for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57: 307-334.
68.
WatzlawickP.WeaklandJ. H.FischR.1974. Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York, NY: Horton.
69.
WeiL. Q.LauC. M.2010. High performance work systems and performance: The role of adaptive capability. Human Relations, 63: 1487-1511.
70.
WeickK. E.1988. Enacted sensemaking in crisis situation. Journal of Management Studies, 25: 305-317.
71.
WeickK. E.1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
WeickK. E.QuinnR. E.1999. Organizational change and development. In SpenceJ. T.DarleyJ. M.FossD. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology: 361-386. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
73.
WernerfeltB.1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180.
74.
WoodmanR. W.SawyerJ. E.GriffinR. W.1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.
75.
WrightP. M.HaggertyJ. J.2005. Missing variables in theories of strategic human resource management: Time, cause, and individuals. Management Revue, 16: 164-173.
76.
WrightP. M.SnellS. A.1998. Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23: 756-772.
77.
ZhouJ.ShinS. J.CannellaA. A.Jr.2008. Employee self-perceived creativity after mergers and acquisitions: Interactive effects of threat-opportunity perception, access to resources, and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44: 397-421.
