In a modern economy, much of the allocation of financial and nonfinancial resources is mediated by organizations. This essay points to three general features of this mediating role of organizations in the resource allocation process. One line of argument relates to the distinct opportunities and opportunity costs that an organization faces. The set of investment opportunities for organizations differs as a result of their privileged access to different investment opportunities. The second line of argument considers the impact of differential beliefs and perspectives on the resource allocation process. The diversity of independent budgetary entities, both internal to and external to the organization, is argued to importantly influence the heterogeneity of the bases of selection among alternative investment opportunities. Lastly, this mediation of resource allocation by the firm plays a particularly important role with respect to the allocation of resources over time on a given initiative. Organizations do not simply buffer initiatives from selection but potentially provide different bases for interim selection processes.
AdnerR.LevinthalD.2002. The emergence of emerging technologies. California Management Review, 45(1): 50-66.
2.
AdnerR.LevinthalD.2004. What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Academy of Management Review, 29: 74-85.
3.
AdnerR.LevinthalD.2008. Doing versus seeing: Acts of exploitation and perceptions of exploration. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2: 43-52.
4.
AmramM.KulatilakaN.1998. Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
BardoletD.FoxC.LovalloD.2011. Corporate capital allocation: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1465-1483.
6.
BarneyJ. B.1986. Strategic factor market: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32: 1231-1241.
7.
BarsadeS.2002. The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 644-675.
8.
BergerP.OfekE.1995. Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37: 39-65.
9.
BowerJ.1970. Managing the resource allocation process. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
CattaniG.2005. Pre-adaptation, firm heterogeneity and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970–1995. Organization Science, 16: 563-580.
11.
ChandlerA.1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
CoaseR.1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4: 386-405.
13.
CohenW.LevinthalD.1994. Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science, 40: 227-251.
14.
GibbonsR.HendersonR.2012. Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organization Science, 23: 1350-1364.
15.
GrantR.1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122.
16.
GrossmanS.HartO.1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical integration and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 691-719.
17.
HallS.LovalloD.MustersR.2012. How to put your money where your mouth is. McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 28-38.
18.
HarnishV.2012. The greatest business decisions of all time: How Apple, Ford, IBM, Zappos, and others made radical choices that changed the course of businesses. New York: Fortune Books.
19.
HelfatC.1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 339-360.
20.
HelfatC.EisenhardtK.2004. Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1217-1232.
21.
HelfatC.LiebermanM.2002. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 725-760.
22.
HollandJ.1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
JensenM.1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76: 323-329.
24.
KogutB.ZanderU.1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
25.
LauD.MurnighanK.1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23: 325-340.
26.
LevinthalD.2007. Bringing selection back into our evolutionary theories of innovation. In MalerbaF.BrusoniS. (Eds.), Perspectives on the economics of innovation: 291-307. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LevinthalD.MarinoA.2015. Three facets of organizational adaptation: Selection, variety, and plasticity. Organizational Science, 26: 743-755.
28.
LevinthalD.PosenH.2007. Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficiency of population selection?Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 586-620.
29.
LevinthalD.WuB.2010. The rational tradeoff between corporate scope and profit margins: The role of capacity-constrained capabilities and market maturity. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 780-801.
30.
LewisC. S.1955. The magician’s nephew. New York: Collins.
31.
MarchJ.SimonH.1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
32.
McGrathR.1997. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22: 974-996.
33.
MoranP.GhoshalS.1999. Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Academy of Management Review, 24: 390-412.
34.
NelsonR.WinterS.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
PenroseE.1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
36.
RajanR.ZingalesL.1998. Power in a theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 387-432.
37.
RobbinsL.1932. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
38.
SiggelkowN.LevinthalD.2004. Temporally divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational adaptations to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14: 650-669.
39.
SiggelkowN.LevinthalD.2005. Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps: Linking the dynamics of the organizational structure to the dynamics of search. Strategic Organization, 3: 85-115.
40.
SimonH. A.1991. Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 25-44.
41.
SteinJ.1997. Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52: 111-133.
42.
WilliamsonO.1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free Press.
43.
WilliamsonO.1983. Organizational form, residual claimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 351-366.
44.
WilliamsonO.1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
45.
WuB.2013. Opportunity costs, industry dynamics, and corporate diversification: Evidence from the cardiovascular medical device industry, 1976-2004. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1265-1287.
46.
WuB.WanZ.LevinthalD.2014. Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choice. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1257-1278.
