The innovations of creative individuals are regarded as vital for business functioning and survival. To this end, efforts have been made to design measures of creative personality in hopes of predicting creative performance. Current measures of creative personality all reside at the explicit level, yet theory and research both suggest that a large proportion of personality can also be conceptualized at the implicit level. We address this issue by presenting a theoretical basis for creative personality that operates on an implicit level. Using conditional reasoning methodology, we describe five cognitive biases that serve as justification mechanisms for creative personality. Next, we link implicit creative personality to creative abilities through a developmental process. We then test this model and our new measure of creative personality in five different studies. Our results provide evidence in support of an implicit component of creative personality and suggest that it is a substantial predictor of creative performance. Finally, we describe the management and human resources implications of the conceptualization of creative personality as an implicit construct.
AmabileT. M.1982. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 997-1013.
2.
AmabileT. M.1996. Creativity in context: Updated to ‘The social psychology of creativity.’Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
AndersonN.PotočnikK.ZhouJ.2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40: 1297-1333.
4.
BainK.2012. What the best college students do. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
5.
BanduraA.1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
6.
BingM. N.LeBretonJ. M.DavisonH. K.MigetzD. Z.JamesL. R.2007. Integrating implicit and explicit social cognitions for enhanced personality assessment: A general framework for choosing measurement and statistical methods. Organizational Research Methods, 10: 136-179.
7.
BingM. N.StewartS. M.DavisonH. K.GreenP. D.McIntyreM. D.JamesL. R.2007. An integrative typology of personality assessment of aggression: Implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3: 722-744.
8.
BinkM. L.MarshR. L.2000. Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 4: 59-78.
9.
BlockJ.1995. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 187-215.
10.
BowlerJ. L.BowlerM. C.CopeJ. G.2013. Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: An examination of faking. Personality and Individual Differences, 55: 459-464.
11.
BrandstätterH.2011. Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51: 222-230.
12.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 116-131.
13.
CampbellD. J.2000. The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14: 52-66.
14.
CohenJ.1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 155-159.
15.
CrossanM. M.ApaydinM.2010. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 1154-1191.
16.
CrutchfieldR. S.1955. Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10: 191-198.
17.
CrutchfieldR. S.1962. Conformity and creative thinking. In GruberH. E.TerrellG.WertheimerM. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado: 120-140. New York: Atherton Press.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiM.1996. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discover and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
19.
DeYoungC. G.FlandersJ. L.PetersonJ. B.2008. Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Research Journal, 20: 278-290.
20.
DunckerK.1945. On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58: i-113.
21.
DunnR.2015. The man who touched his own heart: True tails of science, surgery, and mystery. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
22.
DweckC. S.1975. The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31: 674-685.
23.
FarmerS. M.TierneyP.Kung-McIntyreK.2003. Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 618-630.
24.
FeistG. J.BarronF. X.2003. Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37: 62-88.
25.
FordC. M.1996. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1112-1142.
26.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ.2005. Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 263-275.
27.
FrostB. C.KoC. E.JamesL. R.2007. Implicit and explicit personality: A test of a channeling hypothesis for aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1299-1319.
28.
GeorgeJ. M.2007. Creativity in organizations. In WalshJ. P.BriefA. P. (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals, vol. 1: 439-477. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
GilsonL. L.2008. Why be creative: A review of the practical outcomes associated with creativity at the individual, group, and organizational levels. In ZhouJ.ShalleyC. E. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity: 303-322. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
GoughH. G.1979. A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1398-1405.
31.
GrantA. M.AshfordS. J.2008. The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28: 3-34.
32.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102: 4-27.
33.
GuilfordJ. P.1950. Creativity. American Psychologist, 5: 444-454.
34.
GuilfordJ. P.1967. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
HaidtJ.2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814-834.
36.
HelsonR.RobertsB.AgronickG.1995. Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 1173-1183.
37.
HocevarD.1979. The development of the creative behavior inventory (CBI). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association.
38.
HoganR.2005. In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners. Human Performance, 18: 331-341.
39.
IsaacsonW.2011. Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
JabriM. M.1991. The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem-solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51: 975-983.
41.
JamesL. R.1998. Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 131-163.
42.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG.1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.
43.
JamesL. R.LeBretonJ. M.2012. Assessing the implicit personality through conditional reasoning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
JamesL. R.McIntyreM. D.2000. Conditional reasoning test of aggression: Test manual. Knoxville, TN: Innovative Assessment Technology, LLC.
45.
JamesL. R.McIntyreM. D.GlissonC. A.GreenP. D.PattonT. W.LeBretonJ. M.FrostB. C.RussellS.SablynskiC. J.MitchellT. R.WilliamsL. J.2005. A conditional reasoning measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 69-99.
46.
KanferR.ChenG.PritchardR. (Eds.) 2008. Work Motivation: Past, Present, and Future. New York: Psychology Press.
47.
KerrS.1975. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18: 769-783.
48.
Kets De VriesM. F. R.1977. The entrepreneurial personality: A person at the crossroads. Journal of Management Studies, 14: 34-57.
49.
KirtonM.1976. Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61: 622-629.
50.
KristofA. L.1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49: 1-49.
51.
LeBretonJ. M.BarksdaleC. D.RobinJ.JamesL. R.2007. Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: Indirect measurement and test faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1-16.
52.
LewisM.2003. Moneyball. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
53.
MarchJ. G.ShapiraZ.1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33: 1404-1418.
54.
McClellandD. C.1987. Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
McCraeR. R.1987. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 1258-1265.
56.
MednickS. A.1962. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69: 220-232.
57.
MeyersonD. E.ScullyM. A.1995. Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6: 585-600.
58.
Miron-SpektorE.ErezM.NavehE.2011. The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 740-760.
59.
MorgesonF. P.CampionM. A.DipboyeR. L.HollenbeckJ. R.MurphyK.SchmittN.2007. Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60: 683-729.
60.
MuellerJ. S.MelwaniS.GoncaloJ. A.2012. The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23: 13-17.
61.
MuellerJ. S.WakslakC. J.KrishnanV.2014. Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51: 81-87.
62.
MumfordM. D.ScottG. M.GaddisB.StrangeJ. M.2002. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13: 705-750.
63.
MurrayH. A.1938. Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D.1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84: 231-259.
65.
Perry-SmithJ. E.ShalleyC. E.2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28: 89-106.
66.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W.1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12: 531-544.
67.
RandA.1943. The fountainhead. New York: Signet.
68.
Schmitt-RodermundE.2004. Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65: 498-518.
69.
SchoenJ. L.2015. Effects of implicit achievement motivation, expected evaluations, and domain knowledge on creative performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36: 319-338.
70.
SchoenJ. L.DeSimoneJ. A.JamesL. R.2011. Exploring joint variance between independent variables and a criterion. Organizational Research Methods, 14: 674-695.
71.
ShalleyC. E.1991. Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 179-185.
72.
ShalleyC. E.1995. Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 483-503.
73.
ShalleyC. E.GilsonL. L.BlumT. C.2009. Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 489-505.
74.
ShalleyC. E.Perry-SmithJ. E.2001. Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84: 1-22.
75.
ShalleyC. E.ZhouJ.OldhamG. R.2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management, 30: 933-958.
76.
ShepherdD. A.SutcliffeK. M.2011. Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36: 361-380.
77.
StawB.1995. Why no one really wants creativity. In FordC.GioiaD. (Eds.), Creative action in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real voices: 161-166. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M.2002. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1137-1148.
79.
UhlmannE. L.LeavittK.MengesJ. I.KoopmanJ.HoweM.JohnsonR. E.2012. Getting explicit about the implicit: A taxonomy of implicit measures and guide for their use in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 553-601.
80.
VanceA.2015. Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the quest for a fantastic future. New York: HarperCollins.
WinterD. G.JohnO. P.StewartA. J.KlohnenE. C.DuncanL. E.1998. Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105: 230-250.
83.
WoodmanR. W.SawyerJ. E.GriffinR. W.1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.
84.
ZhaoH.SeibertS. E.2006. The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 259-271.
85.
ZhouJ.1998. Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 261-276.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
