A recent article in the Journal of Management gives a critique of a Bayesian approach to factor analysis proposed in Psychological Methods. This commentary responds to the authors’ critique by clarifying key issues, especially the use of priors for residual covariances. A discussion is also presented of cross-loadings and model selection tools. Simulated data are used to illustrate the ideas. A reanalysis of the example used by the authors reveals a superior model overlooked by the authors.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB.2010. A new look at the Big-Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22: 471-491.
3.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.NagengastB.MorinA. J. S.Von DavierM.2013. Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right. Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18: 257-284.
4.
MarshH. W.MorinA. J. S.ParkerP. D.KaurG.2014. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10: 85-110.
5.
MarshH. W.MuthénB.AsparouhovA.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.2009. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16: 439-476.
6.
McGeeJ. E.PetersonM.MuellerS. L.SequeiraJ. M.2009. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33: 965-988.
7.
MorinA. J. S.ArensA. K.MarshH. W. in press. A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling.
8.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT.2012. Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17: 313-335.
9.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.2010. A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45: 73-103.
10.
SchmittT. A.SassD. A.2011. Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 71: 95-113.
11.
SchwarzG.1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6: 461-464.
12.
StromeyerW. R.MillerJ. W.SriramachandramurthyR.DeMartinoR.2015. The prowess and pitfalls of Bayesian structural equation modeling: Important considerations for management research. Journal of Management, 41: 491-520.
13.
ThurstoneL. L.1947. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago.
14.
ZyphurM. J.OswaldF. L.2015. Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41: 390-420.