Prior research on interorganizational trust (IOT) has drawn on multiple theories across disciplines, resulting in mixed findings. This meta-analysis combines the three major theories of IOT, namely, transaction cost economics, social embeddedness theory, and resource dependence theory, to retheorize about these IOT relationships. Specifically, we consolidate 168 tests of IOT across theories and corroborate the additive predictive validity of each of the three theories and their combined explanations on IOT development. In particular, by combining IOT theories, we find an inverted U-shaped relationship between relationship duration and IOT; we also find an intertemporal link among the three IOT theories, and relationship duration as the spanning factor functions to moderate the IOT relationships across theories. These findings serve to reconcile prior conflicting findings and shed new light on IOT development. We conclude our meta-analysis by providing directions for future research.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.JooH.2013. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 270-301.
2.
AndaleebS. S.1992. The trust concept: Research issues for channels of distribution. In ShethJ. (Ed.), Research in marketing, vol. 11: 1-34. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
AndersonE.JapS. D.2005. The dark side of close relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3): 75-82.
4.
AndersonE.WeitzB.1989. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8: 310-323.
5.
BachmannR.ZaheerA.2006. Introduction. In BachmannR.ZaheerA. (Eds.), Handbook of trust research: 1-12. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
6.
BeggC. B.MazumdarM.1994. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50: 1088-1101.
7.
BlauP. M.1964. Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
8.
BradachJ. L.EcclesR. G.1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97-118.
9.
BromileyP.HarrisJ.2006. Trust, transaction cost economics, and mechanisms. In BachmannR.ZaheerA. (Eds.), Handbook of trust research: 124-143. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
10.
BrownS. P.PetersonR. A.1993. Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 30: 63-77.
11.
CarsonS. J.MadhokA.WuT.2006. Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1058-1077.
12.
CasciaroT.PiskorskiM. J.2005. Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 167-199.
13.
ChuaR. Y. J.MorrisM. W.IngramP.2009. Guanxi vs. networking. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 490-508.
14.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A.2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 909-927.
15.
CurrallS. C.InkpenA.2002. A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 479-495.
16.
DasT. K.TengB.2001. Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22: 251-283.
17.
De JongB. A.ElfringT.2010. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams?Academy of Management Journal, 53: 535-549.
18.
DhanarajC.LylesM. A.SteensmaH. K.TihanyiL.2004. Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 428-442.
19.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L.2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 611-628.
20.
DuvalS.TweedieR.2000. A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95: 89-98.
21.
DyerJ. H.ChuW.2000. The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31: 259-285.
22.
EdenD.2002. From the editors. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 841-846.
23.
EggerM.Davey SmithG.SchneiderM.MinderC.1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315: 629-634.
24.
EmersonR. M.1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27: 31-41.
25.
FangE.PalmatierR. W.ScheerL. K.LiN.2008. Trust at different organizational levels. Journal of Marketing, 72(2): 80-98.
26.
FerrinD. L.DirksK. T.2003. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14: 18-31.
27.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J.2012. At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38: 1167-1230.
28.
GanesanS.1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2): 1-19.
29.
GargiuloM.ErtugG.2006. The dark side of trust. In BachmannR.ZaheerA. (Eds.), Handbook of trust research: 165-186. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
30.
GeletkanyczM.TepperB. J.2012. Publishing in AMJ
—Part 6: Discussing the implications. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 256-260.
31.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ.-B E. M.CunhaP. V.2009. A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35: 393-419.
32.
GeyskensI.SteenkampJ. E. M.KumarN.1998. Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15: 223-248.
33.
GeyskensI.SteenkampJ. B. E. M.KumarN.2006. Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 519-543.
34.
GhoshalS.MoranP.1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 13-47.
35.
GraebnerM. E.2009. Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 435-472.
36.
GranovetterM.1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
37.
GraysonK.AmblerT.1999. The dark side of long-term relationships in marketing services. Journal of Marketing Research, 36: 132-141.
38.
GraysonK.JohnsonD.ChenD. R.2008. Is firm trust essential in a trusted environment?Journal of Marketing Research, 45: 241-256.
39.
GulatiR.1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 85-112.
GulatiR.SytchM.2007. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 39-55.
42.
GulatiR.SytchM.2008. Does familiarity breed trust?Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 165-190.
43.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI.1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
HeideJ. B.1994. Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 71-85.
45.
HeideJ. B.JohnG.1992. Do norms matter in marketing relationships?Journal of Marketing, 56(2): 32-44.
46.
HeideJ. B.MinerA. S.1992. The shadow of the future. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 265-291.
47.
HeugensP. P.LanderM. W.2009. Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 61-85.
48.
HillC. W. L.1990. Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15: 500-513.
49.
HillmanA. J.WithersM. C.CollinsB. J.2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35: 1404-1427.
50.
HuffcuttA. I.ArthurW.1995. Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 327-334.
51.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L.1990. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting errors and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
KatilaR.RosenbergerJ. D.EisenhardtK. M.2008. Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms, and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 285-332.
54.
KatsikeasC. S.SkarmeasD.BelloD. C.2009. Developing successful trust-based international exchange relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 132-155.
55.
KircaA. H.JayachandranS.BeardenW. O.2005. Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2): 24-41.
56.
KramerR. M.2006. Introduction. In KramerR. M. (Ed.), Organizational trust: A reader: 1-17. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
KumarN.ScheerL. K.SteenkampJ. E. M.1995a. The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32: 54-65.
58.
KumarN.ScheerL. K.SteenkampJ. E. M.1995b. The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32: 348-356.
59.
KumarN.SternL. W.AndersonJ. C.1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1633-1651.
60.
LaneC.1998. Introduction: Theories and issues in the study of trust. In LaneC.BachmannR. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: 1-30. New York: Oxford University Press.
LuiS. S.NgoH.2004. The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. Journal of Management, 30: 471-485.
68.
LuoY.2002. Building trust in cross-cultural collaborations: Toward a contingency perspective. Journal of Management, 28: 669-694.
69.
LuschR. F.BrownJ. R.1996. Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 60(4): 19-33.
70.
MayerK. J.ArgyresN. S.2004. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science, 15: 394-410.
71.
MayerK. J.SparroweR. T.2013. From the editors: Integrating theories in AMJ articles. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 917-922.
72.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709-734.
73.
McAllisterD.1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24-59.
74.
McEvilyB.2011. Reorganizing the boundaries of trust. Organization Science, 22: 1266-1276.
75.
McEvilyB.PerroneV.ZaheerA.2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14: 91-103.
76.
NoordhoffC. S.KyriakopoulosK.MoormanC.PauwelsP.DellaertB. G. C.2011. The bright side and dark side of embedded ties in business-to-business innovation. Journal of Marketing, 75(5): 34-52.
77.
NooteboomB.1996. Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17: 985-1010.
78.
NooteboomB.BergerH.NoorderhavenN. G.1997. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy Management Journal, 40: 308-338.
79.
PalmatierR. W.DantR. P.GrewalD.2007. A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(5): 172-194.
80.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R.1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
81.
PoppoL.ZengerT. R.2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23: 707-725.
82.
RajuN. S.BurkeM. J.NormandJ.LangloisG. M.1991. A new meta-analytic approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 432-446.
83.
RaoA. N.PearceJ. L.XinK.2005. Governments, reciprocal exchange and trust among business associates. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 104-118.
84.
RingP. S.Van de VenA. H.1992. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 483-498.
85.
RosenthalR.1979. The “file-drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 638-641.
86.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC.1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393-404.
87.
SakoM.1991. The role of “trust” in Japanese buyer-supplier relationships. Ricerche Economiche, 45: 449-474.
88.
SakoM.HelperS.1998. Determinants of trust in supplier relations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34: 387-417.
89.
SchoormanF. D.MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32: 344-354.
90.
SheppardB. H.ShermanD. M.1998. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23: 422-437.
91.
SparroweR. T.MayerK. J.2011. Publishing in AMJ—Part 4: Grounding hypotheses. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 1098-1102.
92.
SturmanM. C.2003. Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance. Journal of Management, 29: 609-640.
93.
UzziB.1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35-67.
94.
VannesteB. S.PuranamP.KretschmerT.in press. Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.2198
95.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. C.1995. Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48: 865-885.
96.
WilliamsonO. E.1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
97.
WilliamsonO. E.1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law & Economics, 36: 453-486.
ZaheerA.HarrisJ.2006. Interorganizational trust. In ShenkarO.ReuerJ. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic alliance: 169-197. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100.
ZaheerA.McEvilyB.PerroneV.1998. Does trust matter?Organization Science, 9: 141-159.
101.
ZaheerA.VenkatramanN.1995. Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 373-392.
102.
ZhouK.PoppoL.2010. Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 861-881.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
