This study explores the potential benefits of executive hubris to firm innovation. Grounded in the upper echelons theory and the firm innovation literature, hypotheses were developed and tested in two studies with different contexts and methods. Study 1 uses a set of cross-sectional survey data on a large sample of Chinese CEOs in manufacturing industries. Study 2 uses a set of longitudinal archival data on U.S. public firms in high-tech industries. Both studies render robust support to the authors’ main theoretical prediction—that executive hubris is positively related to firm innovation. The authors further found that the main effect varies under certain environmental conditions: The relationship between executive hubris and firm innovation becomes weaker when the environment is more munificent and complex.
AldrichH.1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
AndersonP.TushmanM.1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclic model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604-633.
4.
BarnettM.2008. An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Academy of Management Review, 33: 606-628.
5.
BarnettV.LewisT.1994. Outliers in statistical data. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
6.
BarneyJ.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
7.
BegleyT.BoydD.1987. Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2: 79-93.
8.
Ben-DavidI.GrahamJ.HarveyC.2006. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. NBER working paper no. 13711. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
9.
BerghD.LawlessM.1998. Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: The effects of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organization Science, 9: 87-102.
10.
BernardoA.WelchI.2001. On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10: 301-331.
11.
BersonY.OregS.DvirT.2008. CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 615-633.
12.
BollaertH.PetitV.2010. Beyond the dark side of executive psychology: Current research and new directions. European Management Journal, 28: 362-376.
13.
BourgeoisL.1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6: 29-39.
14.
BromileyP.1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 37-59.
15.
BrownS.EisenhardtK.1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 20: 343-378.
16.
CamererC.LovalloD.1999. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 89: 306-318.
17.
CastrogiovanniG.2002. Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time?Journal of Management, 28: 129-150.
18.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD.2007. It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 351-386.
19.
ChoT.HambrickD.2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17: 453-469.
20.
CollinsJ.PorrasJ.1994. Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Business.
21.
CortrightJ.MayerH.2001. High tech specialization: A comparison of high technology centers. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
22.
CoyP.2000. The creative economy. Business Week, 28August: 77.
23.
CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL.BecerraM.2010. Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO–TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 69-89.
24.
CyertR.MarchJ.1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
DaftR.1982. Bureaucratic versus nonbureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. In BacharachS. B. (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 1): 129-166. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
26.
DamanpourF.1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 555-590.
DeVolR.1999. American’s high-tech economy: Growth, development and risks for metropolitan areas. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
29.
DotyD. H.GlickW.1998. Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results?Organizational Research Methods, 1: 374-406.
30.
EdwardsJ.2002. Alternative to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. W. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis: 350-400. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
EdwardsJ.ParryM.1993. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1577-1613.
32.
FinkelsteinS.BoydB.1998. How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 179-199.
33.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis: West Educational Publishing.
34.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD.CannellaA.2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
GalassoA.SimcoeT.2011. CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57: 1469-1484.
36.
GarciaR.CalantoneR.2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19: 110-132.
37.
GongG.LiL.XieH.2009. The association between management earnings forecast errors and accruals. Accounting Review, 84: 497-530.
38.
GreveH.2003. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 685-702.
39.
GriffinD.TverskyA.1992. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24: 411-435.
40.
GrimmC.LeeH.SmithK.2006. Strategy as action: Competitive dynamics and competitive advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
HallB.JaffeA.TrajtenbergM.2001. The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper no. 8498. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
42.
HambrickD.2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32:334-343.
43.
HambrickD.FinkelsteinS.1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In StawB.CummingsL. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9): 369-406. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44.
HambrickD.FinkelsteinS.MooneyA.2005. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30: 472-491.
45.
HambrickD.MasonP.1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193-206.
46.
HarhoffD.NarinF.SchererF. M.VopelK.1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81: 511-515.
47.
HausmanJ.1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46: 1251-1271.
48.
HaywardM.2007. Ego check: Why executive hubris is wrecking companies and careers and how to avoid the trap. New York: Kaplan Business.
49.
HaywardM.HambrickD.1997. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 103-127.
50.
HaywardM.ShepherdD.GriffinD.2006. A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science, 52: 160-172.
51.
HilaryG.MenzlyL.2006. Does past success lead analysts to become overconfident?Management Science, 52: 489-500.
52.
HillerN.HambrickD.2005. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-) core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 297-319.
53.
HirshleiferD.LowA.TeohS.2010. Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?Working paper, University of California, Irvine.
54.
HmieleskiK.BaronR.2009. Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of management Journal, 52: 473-488.
55.
JohnsonD.FowlerJ.2011. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature, 477: 317-320.
56.
JudgeT.ErezA.BonoJ.ThoresenC.2002. Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 693-710.
57.
JudgeT.LockeE.DurhamC.1997. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. In StawB.CummingsL. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19): 151-188. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
58.
KahnemanD.TverskyA.1995. Conflict resolution: A cognitive perspective. In ArrowsK.MnookinR.RossL.TverskyA.WilsonR. (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution: 44-61. New York: Norton.
59.
KeatsB.HittM.1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 570-598.
60.
KennedyP.2008. A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
61.
KennedyD.LakonishokJ.ShawW.1992. Accommodating outliers and nonlinearity in decision models: Professional adaptation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 7: 161-194.
62.
KlaymanJ.SollJ.Gonzalez-VallejoC.BarlasS.1999. Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79: 216-247.
63.
KonarS.CohenM.2001. Does the market value environmental performance?Review of Economics and Statistics, 83: 281-289.
64.
KrishnanR.MartinX.NoorderhavenN.2006. When does trust matter to alliance performance?Academy of Management Journal, 49: 894-917.
65.
LaursenK.SalterA.2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 131-150.
66.
LearyW. E.2002. Secrets of 200 years of inventions in the most innovative country. New York Times Online, 6November.
67.
LiJ.TangY.2010. CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 45-68.
68.
LichtenthalerU.2009. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 822-846.
69.
LoweR.ZiedonisA.2006. Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Science, 52: 173-186.
70.
MakriM.LaneP.Gomez-MejiaL.2006. CEO incentives, innovation, and performance in technology-intensive firms: A reconciliation of outcome and behavior-based incentive schemes. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 1057-1080.
71.
MalmendierU.TateG.2005. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60: 2661-2700.
72.
MalmendierU.TateG.2008. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89: 20-43.
73.
MarchJ.1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
74.
MarkusenA.HallP.GlasmeierA.1986. High tech America: The what, how, where, and why of the Sunrise Industries. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
75.
MillerD.FernM.CardinalL.2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 308-326.
76.
MillerD.KetsdeVriesM.ToulouseJ.1982. Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, 25: 237-253.
77.
MillerD.ToulouseJ.1986. Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms. Management Science, 32: 1389-1409.
78.
MooreD.HealyP.2008. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115: 502-517.
79.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2001. China statistical yearbook (Vol. 20). Beijing: China Statistics Press.
80.
PalmerT.WisemanR.1999. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1037-1062.
81.
PlousS.1993. The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
82.
OcasioW.1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187-206.
83.
PengL.XiongW.2006. Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 563-602.
84.
RothaermelF.HessA.2007. Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18: 898-921.
85.
RotterJ.1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1): 1-28.
86.
SaxenianA.1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
SharfmanM.DeanJ.1991. Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17: 681-700.
88.
SimonM.HoughtonS.2003. The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 139-149.
89.
SimsekZ.HeaveyC.VeigaJ.2010. The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 110-119.
90.
SinghJ.1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562-585.
91.
SongM.DyerB.ThiemeR.2006. Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34: 341-356.
92.
SouderD.SimsekZ.JohnsonS.2012. The differing effects of agent and founder CEOs on the firm’s market expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 23-41.
93.
TracyJ.RobinsR.2007. The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 506-525.
94.
TuggleC.SchnatterlyK.JohnsonR.2010. Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 550-571.
95.
Van de VenA.1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32: 590-607.
96.
WadhwaA.KothaS.2006. Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 819-835.
97.
WangH.LiJ.2008. Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34: 925-951.
98.
WangH.QianC.2011. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The role of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 1159-1181.
WiersemaM.BantelK.1993. Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 485-504.
101.
WooldridgeJ.2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102.
YadavM.PrabhuJ.ChandyR.2007. Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 71: 84-101.
103.
YangH.PhelpsC.SteensmaK.2010. Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillover on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 371-389.
104.
YoungG.CharnsM.ShortellS.2001. Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: A study of TQM in a public hospital system. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 935-951.
