Equity theory emphasizes making distinctions between individual contributions to teams and then recognizing these with differentiations in rewards. However, social interdependence theory emphasizes maximizing cooperation in teams by compensating members equally. Several researchers have advocated offsetting the limitations of individually based incentives and group-based incentives by mixing the two. However, the authors contend that this puts team members in a social dilemma, leading them to focus on the individually based component. The authors find that in comparison to group-based only incentives, mixed individual/group incentives lead team members to perform faster but less accurately and focus on their own taskwork to the detriment of backing up behavior.
AdamsJ. S.1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422-436.
2.
AdamsJ. S.1965. Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2: 267-296. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
AllisonS. T.KerrN. L.1994. Group correspondence biases and the provision of public-goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 688-698.
4.
AndersonC. A.LindsayA. J.BushmanB. J.1999. Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8: 3-9.
AramJ. D.1989. The paradox of interdependent relations in the field of social—Issues in management. Academy of Management Review, 14: 266-283.
7.
AxelrodR.1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
8.
BaldwinT. T.BommerW. H.RubinR. S.2007. Developing management skills: What great managers know and do. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
BarnesC. M.HollenbeckJ. R.2009. Sleep deprivation and teams: Burning the midnight oil or playing with fire?Academy of Management Review, 34: 56-66.
10.
BarnesC. M.HollenbeckJ. R.WagnerD. T.DeRueD. S.NahrgangJ. D.SchwindK. M.2008. Harmful help: The costs of backing up behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 529-539.
11.
BeersmaB.HollenbeckJ. R.HumphreyS. E.MoonH.ConlonD. E.IlgenD. R.2003. Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 572-590.
12.
BerkowitzL.DonnersteinE.1982. External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37: 245-257.
13.
BornsteinG.Ben-YossefM.1994. Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 52-67.
14.
BowersC. A.BraunC. C.MorganB. B.1997. Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In BrannickM. T.SalasE.PrinceC. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 85-108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
BrannP.FoddyM.1987. Trust and the consumption of a deteriorating common resource. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31: 615-630.
16.
ColquittJ. A.2008. Publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 616-620.
DawesR. M.1980. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 169-193.
19.
DeMatteoJ. S.EbyL. T.SundstromE.1998. Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 141-183.
20.
DeutschM.1949. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2: 129-152.
21.
DevineD. J.ClaytonL. D.PhilipsJ. L.DunfordB. B.MelnerS. B.1999. Teams in organizations—Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30: 678-711.
22.
DipboyeR. L.FlanaganM. M.1979. Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology. American Psychologist, 34: 141-150.
23.
HackmanJ. R.1990. Groups that work and those that don’t: Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
HenemanR. L.von HippelC.1995. Balancing group and individual rewards: Rewarding individual contributions to the team. Compensation and Benefits Review, 274: 63-68.
25.
HollenbeckJ. R.MoonH.EllisA. P. J.WestB. J.IlgenD. R.SheppardL.PorterC. O. L. H.WagnerJ. A.2002. Structural contingency theory and individual differences: Examination of external and internal person–team fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 599-606.
26.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM. D.JundtD.2005. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 517-534.
27.
JenkinsG. D.MitraA.GuptaN.ShawJ. D.1998. Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 777-787.
28.
JohnsonM. D.HollenbeckJ. R.HumphreyS. E.IlgenD. R.JundtD.MeyerC. J.2006. Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 103-119.
29.
KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D.1993. Social loafing—A meta analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 681-706.
30.
KelleyH. H.GrzelakJ.1972. Conflict between individual and common interest in an N-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21: 190-200.
31.
KomoritaS. S.BarthJ. M.1985. Components of reward in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 364-373.
32.
KomoritaS. S.LapworthC. W.1982. Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 487-496.
33.
KomoritaS. S.ParksC. D.HulbertL. G.1992. Reciprocity and the induction of cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62: 607-617.
34.
KooleS. L.JagerW.van den BergA. E.VlekC. A. J.HofsteeW. K. B.2001. On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 289-301.
35.
KozlowskiS. W. J.IlgenD. R.2006. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7: 77-124.
36.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J.2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.
37.
McIntyreR. M.SalasE.1995. Measuring and managing for team performance: Lessons from complex environments. In GuzzoR. A.SalasE. (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations:9-45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
MitchellT. R.SilverW. S.1990. Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent—Effects on task strategies and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 185-193.
39.
MookD. G.1983. In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38: 379-387.
40.
MurnighanJ. K.1994. Game theory and organizational behavior. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior:83-123. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
41.
NoeR.HollenbeckJ. R.GerhartB. A.WrightP. M.2008. Human resource management: Gaining competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
O’ConnellV.2008. Retailers reprogram workers in efficiency push. The Wall Street Journal, September10: A1.
43.
OlsonM.1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
ParkerG.McAdamsJ.ZielinksiD. (2000). Rewarding teams: Lessons from the trenches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
PearsallM. J.EllisA. P. J.SteinJ. H.2009. Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 18-28.
46.
PettyM. M.SingletonB.ConnellD. W.1992. An experimental evaluation of an organizational incentive plan in the electric utility industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 427-436.
47.
PfefferJ.1995. Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 9: 55-72.
48.
PorterC. O. L. H.2005. Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 811-818.
49.
PorterC. O. L. H.HollenbeckJ. R.IlgenD. R.EllisA. P. J.WestB. J.MoonH.2003. Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 391-403.
50.
ProbstT. M.CarnevaleP. J.TriandisH. C.1999. Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77: 171-191.
51.
PruittD. G.KimmelM. J.1977. 20 years of experimental gaming—Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28: 363-392.
52.
QuigleyN. R.TeslukP. E.LockeE. A.BortolK. M.2007. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18: 71-88.
53.
RapoportA.1987. Research paradigms and expected utility: Models for the provision of step-level public-goods. Psychological Review, 94: 74-83.
54.
RapoportA.EshedlevyD.1989. Provision of step-level public-goods—Effects of greed and fear of being gypped. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44: 325-344.
55.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
ShawJ. D.GuptaN.DeleryJ. E.2002. Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 491-512.
57.
SniezekJ. A.MayD. R.SawyerJ. E.1990. Social uncertainty and interdependence—A study of resource-allocation decisions in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46: 155-180.
58.
TriandisH. C.1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
59.
Van de kragtA. J. C.OrbellJ. M.DawesR. M.1983. The minimal contributing set as a solution to public-goods problems. American Political Science Review, 77: 112-122.
60.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.OkumuraT.BrettJ. M.MooreD. A.TenbrunselA. E.BazermanM. H.2002. Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 87-95.
61.
WagemanR.1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145-180.
62.
WagemanR.2001. The meaning of independence. In TurnerM. E. (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research: 100-110. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
WagnerJ. A.1995. Studies of individualism-collectivism—Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 152-172.
64.
WelbourneT. M.Gomez MejiaL. R.1995. Gainsharing—A critical-review and a future-research agenda. Journal of Management, 21: 559-609.
65.
Wonderlic Associates. 1983. Wonderlic personnel test manual. Northfield, IL: Author.
66.
YamagishiT.SatoK.1986. Motivational bases of the public-goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 67-73.
