This article reviews extant theoretical perspectives and empirical literature at the nexus of network effects and strategy. Building on these insights, it offers a research framework that focuses on three primary avenues: the strategic drivers of network intensity, approaches to assess variations in network intensity, and effective strategies for leveraging network intensity. In doing so, the study widens the perspective of the role of strategy in network industries and offers directions for future research.
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M., & Hermann, A.2005. The social influence of brand community: Evidence fromEuropean car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69: 19-34.
2.
Amine, A., & Sitz, L.2004, October. How does a virtual brand community emerge? Some implications for marketing research. Paper presented at the ESOMAR, Marketing Conference, Warsaw, Poland.
3.
Arthur, W.B.1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99: 116-131.
4.
Arthur, W.B.1990. Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, February: 92-99.
5.
Arthur, W.B.1996. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review, July-August: 100-109.
6.
Asvanund, A. Clay, K., Krishnan, R., & Smith, M.2004. An empirical analysis of network externalities in peer-to-peer music-sharing networks. Information Systems Research, 15: 155-174.
7.
Bental, B., & Spiegel, M.1995. Network competition, product quality, and market coverage in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Industrial Economics, 43: 197-208.
8.
Besen, S., & Farrell, J.1994. Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardization . Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 117-131.
9.
Bettis, R., & Hitt, M.1995. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 7-19.
10.
Bonardi, J., & Durand, R.2003. Managing network effects in high tech industries. Academy of Management Executive, 17: 40-52.
11.
Borgatti, S., Mehra, A., Brass, D., & Labianca, G. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323: 892-895.
12.
Brown, S., Kozinets, R., & Sherry, J.2003. Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing, 67: 19-33.
13.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Kemerer, C.1996. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Science, 42: 1627-1647.
14.
Burt, R.1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Burt, R.2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital . New York: Oxford University Press .
16.
Burt, R. S. 2009. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ghemawat, P.2006. Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Science, 52: 1072-1084.
18.
Chacko, M., & Mitchell, W.1998. Growth incentives to invest in a network-externality environment . Industrial and Corporate Change, 7: 731-744.
19.
Clements, M., & Ohashi, H.2005. Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the U.S., 1994-2002. Journal of Industrial Economics , 53: 515-542.
20.
Cowan, R.1990. Nuclear power reactors: A study in technological lock-in . Journal of Economic History, 50: 541-567.
21.
Cross, R., & Borgatti, S.2004. The ties that share: Relational characteristics that facilitate information seeking. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information technology. Cambridge: MIT Press .
22.
David, P.1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75: 332-337.
23.
Eisenmann, T.2007. Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long-term performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 1183-1204.
24.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M.2006. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84: 92-101.
25.
Evans, D.1987. The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics , 35: 567-581.
26.
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G.1985. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16: 70-83.
27.
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G.1986. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review , 76: 940-955.
28.
Gallaugher, J., & Wang, Y.2002. Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from Web server pricing. MIS Quarterly, 26: 303-327.
29.
Gandal, N.1995. Competing compatibility standards and network externalities in the PC software market. Review of Economics and Statistics , 77: 599-608.
30.
Gibbons, D.2004. Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 938-951.
31.
Granovetter, M.1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
32.
Gupta, S., Jain, D., & Sawnhey, M.1999. Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Science, 18: 396-416.
33.
Hall, B.1987. The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the United States manufacturing sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 583-606.
34.
Hill, C.1997. Establishing a standard: Competitive strategy and technological standards in winner-take-all industries. Academy of Management Executive, 11: 7-18.
35.
Hymer, S., & Pashigian, P.1962. Firm size and rate of growth. Journal of Political Economy, 70: 556-569.
36.
Kalman, D.M. 2009. Brand communities, marketing, and media [White paper]. Retrieved August 10, 2009, from http://www.terrella.com/bcmarketingwp2.pdf
37.
Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C.1986. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities . Journal of Political Economy, 94: 822-841.
38.
Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C.1994. Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 93-115.
39.
Lee, D., & Mendelson, H.2007. Adoption of information technology under network effects . Information Systems Research, 18: 395-413.
Liebowitz, S., & Margolis, S.1990. The fable of the keys. Journal of Law and Economics, 33: 1-26.
42.
Liebowitz, S., & Margolis, S.1994. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 133-150.
43.
Liebowitz, S., & Margolis, S.1995. Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law , Economics, and Organization, 11: 205-226.
44.
Liebowitz, S., & Margolis, S.1999. Winners, losers &Microsoft: Competition and antitrust in high technology. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute.
45.
Lin, L., & Kulatilaka, A.2006. Network effects and technology licensing with fixed fee, royalty, and hybrid contracts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23: 91-118.
46.
Majumdar, S., & Venkatraman, S.1998. Network effects and the adoption of new technology: Evidence from the U.S. telecommunications industry. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1045-1062.
47.
Meyer, J., & Subramaniam, M. 2004. Appropriating innovation value: Effects of technical and cross-industry exploration. In Best paper proceedings, 2004Academy of Management Meetings (pp. 1-6). New Orleans, LA: Technology and Innovation Management Division.
48.
Mullins, R.2003, January 6. Giving new meaning to "branding." BusinessWeek Online. Retrieved August10, 2009, from http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jan2003/sb2003016_2946.htm
49.
Muniz, A., & O’Guinn, T.2001. Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27: 412-432.
50.
Ohashi, H.2003. The role of network effects in the U.S. VCR market, 1978-1986 . Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12: 447-494.
51.
Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M.2005. Two-sided networks: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 5: 1494-1504.
52.
Penrose, E.1955. Limits to the growth and size of firms. American Economic Review, 45: 531-543.
53.
Porter, M.1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
54.
Rohlfs, J.1974. A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science , 5: 16-37.
55.
Saloner, G., & Shepard, A.1995. Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical explanation of the adoption of automated teller machines. RAND Journal of Economics, 26: 479-501.
56.
Schilling, M.1998. Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review, 23: 267-284.
57.
Schilling, M.2002. Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 387-398.
58.
Schilling, M.2003. Technological leapfrogging in the U.S. video game console industry. California Management Review, 45: 6-32.
59.
Shankar, V., & Bayus, B.2002. Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strategic Management Journal , 24: 375-384.
60.
Shapiro, C.1999. The art of standards wars. California Management Review, 41: 8-33.
61.
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H.1999. Information rules. Boston: HBS Press.
62.
Shurmur, M.1993. An investigation into sources of network externalities in the packaged PC software market. Information Economics and Policy, 5: 231-252.
63.
Stremersch, S., Tellis, G., Franses, P., & Binken, J.2007. Indirect network effects in new product growth. Journal of Marketing, 71: 52-74.
64.
Suarez, F.2005. Network effects revisited: The role of strong ties in technology selection. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 710-722.
65.
Suarez, F., & Utterback, J.1995. Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 415-430.
66.
Tanriverdi, H., & Lee, C.2008. Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry . Academy of Management Journal, 51: 381-397.
67.
Venkatraman, N., & Lee, C.2004. Preferential linkage and network evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 876-892.
68.
Venkatraman, N., & Subramaniam, M.2002. Theorizing the future of strategy: Questions shaping strategy research in the knowledge economy. In A. M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management: 461-472. London: Sage.
69.
Weitzel, T., Beimborn, D., & Konig, W.2006. A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quarterly, 30: 489-514.
70.
Weitzel, T., Wendt, O., & Westarp, F. v. 2000, July. Reconsidering network effect theory. Paper presented at the 8th European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna.
71.
Wiggins, R., & Ruefli, T.2002. Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organization Science, 13: 82-106.
