Internal and external sources of efficacy beliefs are distinguished. “Means efficacy,” a particular source of external efficacy, is defined as belief in the utility of the tools available for task performance. The authors tested the hypothesis that raising means efficacy boosts performance. In two field experiments, experimental participants were told they got a new computerized system proven to be the best of its kind; controls got the same system with no means-efficacy treatment. In both experiments, means efficacy among experimental participants increased, and they out-performed the controls. A broadened perspective on the efficacy—beliefs construct is elaborated, and practical applications are proposed.
Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D., & Warshaw, P.R.1992. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45: 660-686.
2.
Bandura, A.1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3.
Brockner, J.1988. Self-esteem at work: Research, theory, and practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
4.
Chan, D.1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234-246.
5.
Chen, G.2005. Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 101-116.
6.
Chen, G., Gully, S.M., & Eden, D.2001. Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4: 62-83.
7.
Chen, G., & Klimoski, R.J.2003. The impact of expectations on newcomer performance in teams as mediated by work characteristics, social exchanges, and empowerment. Academy of Management Journal , 46: 591-607.
8.
Chen, S., Westman, M., & Eden, D.2006. Impact of enhanced resources on anticipatory stress and adjustment to new technology: A field-experimental test of conservation of resources theory. Paper presented at the Work, Stress, and Health 2006: Making a Difference in the Workplace conference, Miami, FL.
9.
Davis, F.D.1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-340.
10.
Davis, F.D.1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38: 475-487.
11.
Eden, D.1996. From self-efficacy to means efficacy: Internal and external sources of general and specific efficacy. Paper presented at the 56th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
12.
Eden, D.2001. Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific subjective efficacy. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy: 73-86. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Eden, D., & Kinnar, J.1991. Modeling Galatea: Boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering . Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 770-780.
14.
Eden, D., & Moriah, L.1996. Impact of internal auditing on branch bank performance: A field experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68: 262-271.
15.
Eden, D., & Zuk, Y.1995. Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. Journal of Applied Psychology , 80: 628-635.
16.
Gal, R.1986. Unit morale: From a theoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration-An Israeli example. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16: 549-564.
17.
Gist, M.E., & Mitchell, T.R.1992. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17: 182-211.
18.
Gist, M.E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B.1989. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 884-891.
19.
Hendrick, C.1990. Replications, strict replications, and conceptual replications: Are they important?Journal of Social Behavior and Personality , 5: 41-50.
Klein, K.J., & Rails, R.S.1995. The organizational dynamics of computerized technology implementation: A review of the empirical literature. In L. R. Gomez-Mejia & M. W. Lawless (Eds.), Implementation management of high technology: 31-79. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
22.
Korunka, C., & Vitouch, O.1999. Effects of implementation of information technology on employee’s strain and job satisfaction: A context-dependent approach . Work and Stress, 34: 341-363.
23.
Latham, G.P.2007. Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Litt, M.D.1988. Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54: 149-160.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B.1982. A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 166-169.
27.
Saks, A.M.1995. Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 211-225.
28.
Selim, H.M.2003. An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40: 343-360.
29.
Stajkovic, A.D., & Luthans, F.1998. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 124: 240-261.
30.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D.2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46: 186-204.
31.
Vroom, V.H.1964. Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
Weinberg, R.S., Gould, D., Yukelson, D., & Jackson, A.1981. The effect of preexisting and manipulated self-efficacy on a competitive muscular endurance task. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3: 345-354.
34.
Woodruff, S.L., & Cashman, J.F.1993. Task, domain, and general efficacy: A reexamination of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 72: 423-432.
