Organizations are dynamic and changing entities. Variables
associated with organizational change have been shown to serve as mediators of
several individual difference variable/workrelated outcome relationships. This
study examines three potential antecedents of 258 police officers' attitudes
toward organizational change (ATOC), and whether ATOC mediates the relationships
between these antecedents and affective organizational commitment (AOC). At the
time of data collection, the officers' police department was restructuring its
organizational design. Structural equation modeling indicates the growth need
strength/AOC relationship is fully mediated, whereas the locus of control/AOC and
internal work motivation/AOC relationships are partially mediated by ATOC.
Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P.1996. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to
the organization: An examination of construct validity.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49:
252-276.
2.
Amabile, T.M., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A., & Tighe, E.M.1994. The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic
and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 66:
950-967.
3.
Antoni, C.H.2004. Research note: A motivational perspective on change
processes and outcomes. European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 13:
197-216.
4.
Armenakis, A.A., & Bedeian, A.G.1999. Organizational change: A review of theory and
research in the 1990s. Journal of Management,
25: 293-315.
5.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A.1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical
considerations . Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 51:
1173-1182.
6.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G.1980. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the
analysis of covariance structures. Psychological
Bulletin, 88:
588-606.
7.
Chen, G., Goddard, T.G., & Casper, W.J.2004. Examination of the relationships among general and
work-specific self-evaluations, work-related control beliefs, and job
attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International
Review, 5:
349-370.
8.
Chou, C.P., & Bentler, P.M.1995. Estimates and tests in structural equation
modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues and
applications: 37-55. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
9.
Coleman, D.F., Irving, G.P., & Cooper, C.L.1999. Another look at the locus of control-organizational
commitment relationship: It depends on the form of commitment.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20:
995-1001.
10.
Deci, E.L., & Moller, A.C.2005. The concept of competence: A starting place for
understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic
motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: 579-597.
New York:
Guilford.
11.
Deloitte & Touche.2005. Managing change. http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/article/0,1002,cid%253D96213,00.html , August
29, 2006.
12.
Dunham, R.B., Grube, J.A., Gardner, D.G., Cummings, L.L., & Pierce, J.L.1989. The development of an attitude toward
change instrument . Paper presented at the Academy of
Management Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC.
13.
Eby, L.T., Freeman, D.M., Rush, M.C., & Lance, C.E.1999. Motivational bases of affective organizational
commitment: A partial test of an integrated theoretical model.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
72: 463-483.
14.
Eccles, J.S.2005. Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of
achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: 105-121.
New York:
Guilford.
15.
Fedor, D.B., Caldwell, S., & Herold, D.M.2006. The effects of organizational changes on employee
commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel
Psychology, 59:
1-29.
16.
Fok, L.Y., Hartman, S.J., Patti, A.L., & Razek, J.R.1999. The relationship between equity sensitivity, growth
need strength, organizational citizenship behavior, and perceived outcomes in the
quality environment: A study of accounting professionals.
Journal of Social behavior and Personality, 15:
99-120.
17.
Graen, G.B., Scandura, T.A., & Graen, M.R.1986. A field experimental test of the moderating effects
of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of
Applied Psychology , 71:
484-491.
18.
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R.1980. Work redesign. Reading,
MA:
Addison-Wesley.
19.
Hatcher, L.1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor
analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary,
NC: SAS Institute
Inc.
20.
Holmbeck, G.N.2002. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and
mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations.
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27:
87-96.
21.
Houkes, I., Janssen, P.P.M., de Jonge, J., & Nijhuis, F.J.N.2001. Work and individual determinants of intrinsic work
motivation, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intentions: A multi-sample
analysis. International Journal of Stress
Management , 8:
257-283.
22.
Hoyle, R.H., & Panter, A.T.1995. Writing about structural equation models. In
R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues and
applications: 158-176. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
23.
James, L.R., & Brett, J.M.1984. Mediators, moderators, and test for
mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology,
69: 307-321.
24.
James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., & Brett, J.M.2006. A tale of two methods.
Organizational Research Methods, 9:
233-244.
25.
Jöreskog, K.G.1993. Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models: 294-316 .
Newbury Park, CA: SAGE
Publications.
26.
Judge, T.A., Erez, A., Bono, J.E., & Thoresen, C.J.2003. The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of a
measure. Personnel Psychology,
56: 303-331.
27.
Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., Durham, C.C., & Kluger, A.N.1998. Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction:
The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 83:
17-34.
28.
Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T.M.1999. Managerial coping with organizational change: A
dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied
Psychology , 84:
107-122.
29.
Kline, R.B.1998. Principles and practice of structural equation
modeling . New York:
Guilford.
30.
Kline, R.B.2005. Principles and practice of structural equation
modeling (2nd ed.). New
York: Guilford.
31.
Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z.2002. The leadership challenge (3rd
ed.). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass .
32.
Lau, C.M., & Woodman, R.W.1995. Understanding organizational change: A schematic
perspective . Academy of Management Journal,
38: 537-554.
33.
Lines, R.2005. The structure and function of attitudes toward
organizational change. Human Resource Development
Review, 4:
8-32.
34.
Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M.1990. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents,
correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.
Psychological Bulletin, 108:
171-194.
35.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V.2002. A comparison of methods to test the significance of
the mediated effect. Psychological Methods,
7: 83-104.
36.
Metcalfe, B., & Dick, G.2000. Is the force still with you? Measuring police
commitment . Journal of Managerial Psychology,
15: 812-832.
37.
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J.1991. A three-component conceptualization of
organizational commitment. Human Resource Management
Review, 1:
61-89.
38.
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J.1997. Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and
application . Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
39.
Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L.2002. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to
the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and
consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior ,
61: 20-52.
40.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M.1982. Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of
commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New
York: Academic
Press.
41.
Pasmore, W., & Fagans, M.1992. Participation, individual development, and
organizational change: A review and synthesis. Journal of
Management, 18:
375-397.
42.
Piderit, S.K.2000. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence:
A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational
change. Academy of Management Review,
25: 783-794.
43.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P.2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A
critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88:
879-903.
44.
Porras, J.I., & Robertson, P.J.1992. Organizational development: Theory, practice, and
research. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(2nd ed.): 3, 719-822.
Palo Alto, CA : Consulting
Psychologist Press.
45.
Preacher, K.J., & Leonardelli, G.J.2006. Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation
tool for mediation tests. http://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm, October 3,
2006.
46.
Reichers, A., Wanous, J., & Austin, J.1997. Understanding and managing cynicism about
organizational change. Academy of Management
Executive, 11:
48-59.
47.
Rotter, J.B.1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus
external control of reinforcement. Psychological
Monographs: General and Applied, 80:
1-28.
48.
Rush, M., Schoel, W., & Barnard, S.1995. Psychological resiliency in the public sector:
"Hardiness" and pressure for change. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 46:
17-39.
49.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L.2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
American Psychologist , 55:
68-78.
50.
Sashkin, M., & Burke, W.1987. Organization development in the
nineteen-eighties. Journal of Management,
13: 393-417.
51.
Schweiger, D., & DeNisi, A.1991. Communicating with employees following a merger: A
longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management
Journal, 34:
110-135.
52.
Sobel, M.E.1988. Direct and indirect effect in linear structure equation
models. In J. S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in
quantitative research: 46-64. Beverly Hills,
CA: SAGE
Publications.
53.
Spector, P.E.1982. Behavior in organizations as a function of
employees' locus of control. Psychological
Bulletin, 91:
482-497.
54.
Spector, P.E.2006. Method variance in organizational research: Truth
or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods,
9: 221-232.
55.
Tiegs, R.B., Tetrick, L.E., & Fried, Y.1992. Growth need strength and context satisfactions as
moderators of the relations of the job characteristics model.
Journal of Management, 18:
575-593.
56.
Vakola, M., & Nikolaou, I.2005. Attitudes towards organizational change: What is
the role of employees' stress and commitment? Employee
Relations, 27:
160-174.
57.
Vakola, M., Tsaousis, I., & Nikolaou, I.2003. The role of emotional intelligence and personality
variables on attitudes toward organizational change.
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19:
88-110.
58.
Vogt, W.P.2007. Quantitative research methods for professionals.
Boston:
Pearson.
59.
Wanberg, C.R., & Banas, J.T.2000. Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a
reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 85:
132-142.
60.
Weick, K., & Quinn, R.1999. Organizational change and
development. Annual Review of Psychology,
50: 361-386.
61.
Woodman, R.1989. Organization change and development: New arenas for
inquiry and action. Journal of Management,
15: 205-228.
62.
Wycoff, M.A., & Skogan, W.G.1994a. Community policing in Madison, Wisconsin: Evaluation of
implementation and impact, 1987-1990 [computer file] (ICPSR version).
Washington, DC: The Police
Foundation [producer] . Ann Arbor,
MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and
Social Research [distributor],
1996.
63.
Wycoff, M.A., & Skogan, W.G.1994b. The effect of a community policing management
style on officers' attitudes. Crime &
Delinquency, 40:
371-383.
64.
Yousef, D.A.2000. Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as
predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-western
setting. Personnel Review, 29:
567-592.
