Using longitudinal survey data from a matched sample of 94 administrative employees across a range of job levels in an organization that was implementing a Web-based enterprise-wide resource planning software system, the authors examined the relationships between technology training and employees’ acceptance and preparation for mandated technology use. Structural equation analyses indicated that employees’ beliefs about resources to support use of new software mediated the relationship between technology training and intention to use new software outside of formal training and prior to mandated use. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Agarwal, R.2004. Individual acceptance of information technologies. In R. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past:85-104. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex.
2.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J.1999. Are individual differences germane to accepting of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30: 361-391.
3.
Ajzen, I.1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.
4.
Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A.1997. A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50: 341-358.
5.
Armitage, C., & Conner, M.2001. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 471-499.
6.
Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Stanush, P., & McNelly, T.1998. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: A quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance, 11: 57-101.
7.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K.1988. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41: 63-105.
8.
Bollen, K. A.1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A.2000. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 654-665.
10.
Davenport, T.2000. The future of enterprise system-enabled organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2): 163-180.
11.
Davis, F. D.1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-339.
12.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R.1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35: 982-1003.
13.
Dulebohn, J. H.2003. Work redesign and technology implementation: The need for compensation system congruency. In D. Stone (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Vol. 3: 153-186. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
14.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Friedman, T.2005. The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
16.
Frone, M., Russell M., & Cooper, M.1992. Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 65-78.
17.
Gagne, R.1995. Learning processes and instruction. Training Research Journal, 1: 17-28.
18.
Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B.1989. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 884-891.
19.
Kirkpatrick, D.1967. Evaluation of training. In R. Craig (Ed.), Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development, 2nd ed.: 87-112. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S.2001. Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 811-824.
21.
Klein, K. J., Hall, R. J., & Laliberte, M.1990. Training and the organizational consequences of technological change: A case study of computer-aided design and drafting. In U. Garttiker & L. Larwood (Eds.), Technological innovation and human resources: End-user training:31-79. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
22.
Kline, R.2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
23.
Kraiger, K., Ford, K., & Salas, E.1993. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 311-328.
24.
Marler, J., & Dulebohn, J. H.2005. A model of employee self-service technology acceptance. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management, Vol. 24: 139-182. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25.
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W.2001. Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32: 86-112.
26.
McDonald, R., & Ho, M.2002. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7: 64-82.
27.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I.1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3): 192-222.
28.
Morris, M., & Venkatesh, V.2000. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53: 375-403.
29.
Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S.1990. Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 148-157.
30.
Noe, R.2005. Employee training and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Plouffe, C., Hulland, J., & Vandenbosch, M.2001. Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions—Understanding merchant sdoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12(2): 208-222.
32.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879-903.
33.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.2001. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001: 471-512.
34.
Scott, J., & Vessey, I.2002. Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications of the ACM, 45: 74-81.
35.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P.1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6: 144-176.
36.
Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Vance, R. J.1995. Generalization of employee involvement training to the job setting: Individual and situational effects. Personnel Psychology, 48: 607-632.
37.
Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Kavanagh, M. J.1995. Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2): 239-252.
38.
Tracey, J., & Tews, M.2005. Construct validity of a general training climate scale. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 353-374.
39.
Venkatesh, V.1999. Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23: 239-260.
40.
Venkatesh, V.2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11: 342-365.
41.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27: 451-481.
42.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D.2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27: 425-478.
43.
Venkatesh, V., & Speier, C.1999. Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the Effect of Mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79: 1-28.
44.
Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G.2002. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33: 297-316.
45.
Webster, J., & Martocchio, J.1993. Turing work into play: Implications for microcomputer software training. Journal of Management, 19: 127-146.
46.
Yelon, L., & Ford, K.1999. Pursuing a multidimensional view of transfer. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12: 58-78.
