Performance appraisal (PA) feedback research suggests that agreement of others' performance feedback with one's own views strongly determines feedback reactions, yet inconsistent results of feedback interventions motivate a search for additional influences. The authors propose that supervisor-subordinate exchange relationships create a social context that substantially influences the PA discussion and feedback reactions. Key mediating variables in this process are employee voice during the PA session and justice judgments. Structural equation modeling analyses of longitudinal data support our model. Exchange relationship showed strong, mediated effects on feedback reactions, whereas performance rating discrepancies had minimal unique effects.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A.1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
2.
Bentler, P. M.1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 10: 238-246.
3.
Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W.1984. Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent.
4.
Bernardin, H. J., Hagan, C. M., Kane, J. S., & Villanova, P.1998. Effective performance management: A focus on precision, customers, and situational constraints. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Blakely, G. L.1993. The effects of performance rating discrepancies on supervisors and subordinates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54: 57-80.
6.
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E.2001. 360 degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 930-942.
7.
Cardy, R. L., & Dobbins, G. H.1994. Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
8.
Cascio, W. F.1991. Applied psychology in personnel management (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E.1998. Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 615-633.
10.
Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R.1992. Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In G. R. Ferris & K. K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, 10: 121-185. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y.2001. Justice at the Millennium: A metaanalytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 425-445.
12.
Dansereau, F., Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J.1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 46-78.
13.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B.1977. Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 39: 1-38.
14.
Dorfman, P. W., Stephan, W. G., & Loveland, J.1986. Performance appraisal behaviors: Supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39: 579-597.
15.
Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G.1997. Implicit theories, self-schema, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 988-1010.
16.
Erdogan, B.2002. Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12: 555-578.
17.
Fairhurst, G. T.1993. The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60: 321-351.
18.
Fairhurst, G. T., Rogers, L. E., & Sarr, R. A.1987. Social structure in leader-member interactions: Managersubordinate control patterns and judgments about the relationship. Communication Yearbook, 10: 395-415.
19.
Farr, J. L., & Levy, P. E. In press. Performance appraisal. In L. L. Koppes (Ed.), The science and practice of industrial-organizational psychology: The first hundred years. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Folger, R.1977. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 108-119.
21.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R.1998. Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R.1992. A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 14: 129-177, Greenwich, CT: JAI.
23.
Gavin, M. B., Green, S. G., & Fairhurst, G. T.1995. Managerial control strategies for poor performance over time and the impact on subordinate reactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2): 207-221.
24.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V.1997. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827-844.
25.
Giles, W. F., & Mossholder, K. W.1990. Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 371-377.
26.
Gilliland, S. W., & Langdon, J. C.1998. Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice: 209-243. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Graen, G. B, Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P.1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 30: 109-131.
28.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M.1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2): 219-247.
29.
Greenberg, J.1986. Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & B. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, 1: 25-41.Greenwich, CT: JAI.
30.
Greenberg, J.1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16: 399-432.
31.
Greller, M. M.1978. The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4): 646-658.
32.
Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S.1999. Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodelled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2: 233-256.
33.
Holbrook, R. L., Jr.2002. Contact points and flash points: Conceptualizing the use of justice mechanisms in the performance appraisal interview. Human Resource Management Review, 12: 101-123.
34.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M.1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1-55.
35.
Ilgen, D. R.1993. Performance-appraisal accuracy: An illusive or sometimes misguided goal? In H. Schuler, G. L. Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives: 235-252. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S.1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4): 349-371.
37.
Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M.2003. The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 764-772.
38.
Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E.2000. Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5): 708-723.
39.
Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. 2002. Self-ratings and reactions: Asking for input isn't always enough. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto.
40.
Keeping, L. M., Makiney, J. D., Levy, P. E., Moon, M., & Gillette, L. M. 1999. Self-ratings and reactions to feedback: It's not how you finish, but where you start. In R. A. Noe (Chair), New approaches to understanding employees' affective and behavioral responses to multi-rater feedback systems. Symposium conducted at the 59th annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
41.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N.1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert & S. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 1: 233-265. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254-284.
43.
Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L.1995. Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21: 657-669.
44.
Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J.1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 60-84.
45.
Leung, K., & Li, W.1990. Psychological mechanisms of process-control effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 613-620.
46.
Levy, P. E., Cawley, B. D., & Foti, R. J.1998. Reactions to appraisal discrepancies: Performance ratings and attributions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12: 437-455.
47.
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R.1998. The role of perceived system knowledge in predicting appraisal reactions, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 53-65.
48.
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R.2004. The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6): 881-905.
49.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D.1993. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 662-674.
50.
Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 56-88. Stanford, CA: Stanford California Press.
51.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C.1990. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 952-959.
52.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
53.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B.1987. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley.
54.
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S.2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 738-748.
55.
Meyer, H.H.1991. A solution to the performance appraisal feedback enigma. Academy of Management Executive, 5: 68-76.
56.
Moorman, R. H.1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 845-855.
57.
Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E.2000. Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling, 7: 36-73.
58.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N.1995. Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goalbased perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K.1998-2004. Mplus user's guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
60.
People IQ. 2005. Study: Performance appraisals are damaging HR's reputation. Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://www.peopleiq.com/hot_news.html.
61.
Peterson, R. S.1999. Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for improving satisfaction with leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3): 313-324.
62.
Roberson, Q. M., Moye, N. A., & Locke, E. A.1999. Identifying a missing link between participation and satisfaction: The mediating role of procedural justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 585-593.
63.
Scandura, T. A.1999. Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 10: 25-40.
64.
Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A.1994. Leader-member exchange and supervisor career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1588-1602.
65.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W.2002. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods,7: 147-177.
66.
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. 1980. Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City.
67.
Stone, D. L., Gueutal, H. G., & McIntosh, B.1984. The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy. Personnel Psychology, 37: 487-506.
68.
Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R.1984. Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2: 81-124.
69.
Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J.1995. Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 495-523.
