The authors examine how co-opetition—simultaneous cooperation and competition—affects firms'competitive behavior, proposing that differential structural positions among firms in a coopetitive network reflect resource asymmetries among them and that such asymmetries lead to differences in the volume and diversity of competitive actions undertaken by those firms. Data on cooperative network structure and competitive actions from the steel industry suggest that the firm's centrality is positively related to its volume of competitive actions and that its structural autonomy is positively related to the diversity of such actions. Moreover, market diversity moderates the impact of centrality and structural autonomy on competitive behavior.
Ahlbrandt, R. S., Fruehan, R. J., & Giarratani, F.1996. The renaissance of American steel: Lessons for managers in competitive industries. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Ahuja, G.2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.
3.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G.1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S.2000. “Co-opetition” in business networks—To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29: 411-426.
5.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C.1999. Ucinet 5 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J.1996. Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
7.
Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E.1992. Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 191-215. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
Burt, R. S.1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Burt, R. S.2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-399.
10.
Caves, R. E.1984. Economic analysis and the quest for competitive advantage. The American Economic Review, 74(2): 127-132.
11.
Chen, M.-J.1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21: 100-134.
12.
Chen, M.-J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M.1992. Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Science, 38: 439-455.
13.
Contractor, F., & Lorange, P.1988. Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures. In F. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business: 3-30. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
14.
D'Aveni, R. A.1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
15.
Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M.1999. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 372-388.
16.
Galaskiewicz, J.1979. Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Gimeno, J.1999. Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: Staking out “spheres of influence” in the U.S. airline industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 101-128.
18.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R.2001. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 431-445.
19.
Gomes-Casseres, B.1996. The alliance revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Granovetter, M. S.1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
21.
Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G.1997. Strategy as action: Industry rivalry and coordination. St. Paul, MN: West.
22.
Hamel, G.1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer Special Issue): 83-103.
23.
Harbison, J. R., & Pekar, P., Jr.1998. Smart alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Jacobson, R.1992. The “Austrian” school of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 17: 782-807.
25.
Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L.2004. Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30: 779-804.
26.
Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N.1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 193-210.
27.
Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E.2003. Designing alliance networks: The interacting effects of environmental change and firm strategy on firm performance. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe.
28.
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C.1997. Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22: 110-141.
29.
Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P., & Pensky, D.1983. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In R. Burt & M. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction: 18-87. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J.1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23: 438-458.
31.
Lieberman,M. B., & Montgomery, D. B.1998.First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resourcebased view. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1111-1125.
32.
Lin, N.1982. Social resources and instrumental action. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis: 131-145. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Madhavan, R., Gnyawali, D. R., & He, J.2004. Two's a company, three's is a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 918-927.
34.
Miller, D., & Chen, M.-J.1994. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 1-23.
35.
Miller, D., & Chen, M.-J.1996. The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 419-439.
36.
Moldoveanu, M. C., Baum, J. A., & Rowley, T.2003. Information regimes, information strategies and the evolution of interfirm network topologies. In F. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues, vol. 2: 221-264. Amsterdam: JAI.
37.
Nayyar, P. R., & Bantel, K. A.1994. Competitive agility: A source of competitive advantage based on speed and variety. Advances in Strategic Management, 19: 193-222.
38.
Nohria, N.1992. Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action: 1-22. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
Nohria, N., & Garcia-Pont, C.1991. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer Special Issue): 105-124.
40.
Padgett, J. F., & Ansell, C. K.1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1259-1319.
41.
Porter, M. E.1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
42.
Porter, M. E., & Fuller, M. B.1986. Coalitions and global strategy. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries, chap. 10: 315-343. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
43.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L.1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116-145.
44.
Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A.1986. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7: 485-501.
45.
Rogers, E. M.1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
46.
Simon, H. A.1985.What we know about the creative process. In R. L. Kuhn (Ed.), Frontiers in creative and innovative management, vol. 4: 3-20. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
47.
Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H.2001. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In J. S. Harrison (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 315-361. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
48.
Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M.1991. A communication-information model of competitive response timing. Journal of Management, 17(1): 5-23.
49.
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., & Gannon, M. J.1992. Dynamics of competitive strategy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M.-J.1991. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 60-85.
51.
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Wally, S., & Young, G.1997.Strategic groups and rivalrous firm behavior: Towards a reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal, 18(2): 149-157.
52.
Stephenson, K., & Zelen, M.1989. Rethinking centrality: Methods and applications. Social Networks, 11: 1-37.
53.
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A.1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-624.
54.
Uzzi, B.1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35-67.
55.
Valente, T. W.1995. Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
56.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K.1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Young, G., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M.1996. “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization Science, 7: 243-254.
