This article introduces and explores the construct of pro-social
rule breaking. Pro-social rule breaking is rooted in a desire to promote the
welfare of the organization or one of its stakeholders. The first two studies used
interview data to identify three primary types of pro-social rule breaking: rule
breaking to perform one’s responsibilities more efficiently, rule breaking to help
a subordinate or colleague, and rule breaking to provide good customer service. A
third study used a scenario-based laboratory experiment. It found that the
likelihood of pro-social rule breaking was positively related to job autonomy,
coworker behavior, and risk-taking propensity.
Asch, J. E.1951. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and
distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men:177-190. Pittsburgh, PA:
Carnegie Press.
2.
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E.1998. Out on a limb: The role of context and impression
management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 43:
23-57.
3.
Axelrod, R.1986. An evolutionary approach to norms.
American Political Science Review, 80:
1095-1111.
4.
Barnard, C.1938. Functions of the executive.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
5.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M.1993. The proactive component of organizational behavior:
A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 14:
103-118.
6.
Batson, C. D.1991. The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological
answer. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Baucus, M.1994. Pressure, opportunity and predisposition: A
multivariate model of corporate illegality. Journal of
Management, 20:
699-721.
8.
Berkowitz, L.1972. Social punishments, feelings and other factors
affecting helping and altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology:63-108. New York:
Academic Press.
9.
Brief, A., & Motowidlo, S.1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors.
Academy of Management Review, 11:
710-725.
10.
Brockhaus, R. H.1980. Risk-taking propensity of
entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal,
23: 509-520.
11.
Campbell, D. J.2000. The proactive employee: Managing workplace
initiative. Academy of Management Executive,
14: 52-66.
12.
Davis, M. H.1980. Empathy: A social psychological approach.
Dubuque, IA: Brown
Communications.
13.
Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E.1997. Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the
context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic
Management Journal, 18:
407-425.
14.
Edgerton, R.1985. Rules, exceptions and social order.
Berkeley: SAGE
Publications.
15.
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P.1987. The relation of empathy to prosocial and related
behaviors. Psychological Bulletin,
101: 91-119.
16.
Eisenhardt, K.1989. Agency theory: An assessment and
review. Academy of Management Review,
14: 57-74.
17.
Feldman, D. C.1984. The development and enforcement of group
norms. Academy of Management Review,
9: 47-53.
18.
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K. & Tag, A.1997. The concept of personal initiative:
Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German
samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 70:
139-161.
19.
Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D.2000. Control and complexity in work and the development of
personal initiative: A four wave longitudinal structural equation model of
occupational socialization. Working paper, University of
Giessen, Giessen,
Germany.
20.
Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J.1997. Antisocial behavior in organizations.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publications.
21.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B.1989. Effectiveness of individual and aggregate
compensation strategies. Industrial Relations,
28: 431-445.
22.
Graham, J. W.1986. Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical
essay. In L. L. Cummings & B. W. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 8:
1-52. Greenwich, CT:
JAI.
23.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a
theory. Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, 15:
250-279.
24.
Hollinger, R. V.1986. Acts against the workplace: Social bonding and
employee deviance. Deviant Behavior,
7: 53-75.
25.
Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A.1990. Champions of technological
innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,
35: 317-341.
26.
Jackson, J.1966. A conceptual and measurement model for norms and
roles. Pacific Sociological Review,
9: 35-47.
27.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A.1964. Risk taking: A study in cognition and
personality. New York:
Rinehart & Winston.
28.
March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X.2000. The dynamics of rules. Stanford,
CA: Stanford
Press.
29.
McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M.1994. The role of dispositional and situational
antecedents in prosocial behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of
prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 79:
836-844.
30.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P.1992. Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal
implications for companies and employees. New
York: Lexington.
31.
Milgram, S.1974. Obedience to authority. New
York: Harper &
Row.
32.
Moberg, D. J.1997. On employee vice. Business
Ethics Quarterly, 7:
41-60.
33.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C.1999. Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to
initiate workplace change. Academy of Management
Journal, 42:
403-419.
34.
Nemeth, C. J.1997. Managing innovation: When less is
more. California Management Review,
40: 59-74.
35.
Organ, D. W.1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier
syndrome. Lexington, MA:
Lexington Books.
Puffer, S. M.1987. Prosocial behavior, non-compliant behavior, and
work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 72:
615-621.
38.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J.1995. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A
multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management
Journal, 2:
555-572.
39.
Rushing, W. A.1975. Deviant behavior and social process.
Chicago: Rand
McNally.
40.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J.1978. A social information processing approach to job
attitudes and task design. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 23:
224-253.
41.
Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W.2002. Relationship quality and relationship context as
antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship
behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,
87: 255-267.
42.
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L.1992. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk
behavior. Academy of Management Review,
17: 9-38.
43.
Spreitzer, G. M.1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace:
Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of
Management Journal, 38:
1442-1465.
44.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S.2003. Positive deviance and extraordinary
organizing. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:207-224. San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
45.
Staw, B., & Boettger, R.1990. Task revision: A neglected form of work
performance. Academy of Management Journal,
3: 534-559.
46.
Van Dyne, L., & Lepine, J. A.1998. Helping and voice extra-role behavior: Evidence of
construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management
Journal, 1:
108-119.
47.
Vardi, Y., & Weiner, Y.1996. Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational
framework. Organization Science,
7: 151-165.
48.
Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E.2004. Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research and
management. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Warren, D. E.2003. Constructive and destructive deviance in
organizations. Academy of Management Review,
28: 622-632.
50.
Williamson, O. E.1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets,
relational contracting. New York:
Free Press.
51.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J.2001. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active
crafters of their work. Academy of Management
Review, 26:
179-201.
