This study contrasts the structural perspective with the individual perspective in explaining group performance in a dynamic setting. The authors argue that these perspectives are not mutually exclusive but have different predictive powers at different group stages. Results from 45 project groups show (a) group structures provide stronger performance predictions at the later stage, whereas individual-based attributes do so at the earlier stage, and (b) different group structures and individual-based attributes provide distinctive insights at respective stages. This indicates the need to explore the potential bridge between the two perspectives in advancing group studies.
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L.1997. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8: 289-309.
2.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17-40.
3.
Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F., & Carley, K. M.2003. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49: 21-38.
4.
Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T.1999. Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25: 231-292.
5.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L.2000. Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L.1997. The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1369-1397.
7.
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L.1997. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 62-79.
8.
Baugh, S. G., & Graen, G. B.1997. Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross functional teams. Group and Organization Management, 22: 366-384.
9.
Bliese, P. D.2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C.1999. UCINET 5.0 Version 1.00. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
11.
Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W.1995. Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 168-177.
12.
Brass, D. J.1992. Power in organizations: A social network perspective. Research in Politics and Society, 4: 295-323.
13.
Brockner, J., & Adsit, L.1986. The moderating impact of sex on the equity-satisfaction relationship: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 585-590.
14.
Brodbeck, F., & Greitemeyer, T.2000. A dynamic model of group performance: Considering the group members’ capacity to learn. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3: 159-182.
15.
Burt, R. S.1984. Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6: 293-340.
16.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, J. G., & Higgs, A. C.1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-850.
17.
Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J.1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49: 429-452.
18.
Chang, A., Bordia, P., & Duck, J.2003. Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: Toward a new understanding of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 106-117.
19.
Chen, G., & Klimoski, R. J.2003. The impact of expectations on newcomer performance in teams as mediated by work characteristics, social exchanges, and empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 591-607.
20.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E.1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
21.
Coleman, J. S.1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Collins, R.1988. Theoretical sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23.
Cox, T., Lobel, S., & McLeod, P.1991. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 827-847.
24.
Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R.2003. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25: 197-210.
25.
Darlington, R. B.1968. Multiple regression in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 69: 161-182.
26.
Devine, D. J., & Philips, J. L.2001. Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32: 507-532.
27.
DiMaggio, P.1986. Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 335-370.
28.
Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N.1997. The dynamics and evolution of social networks. In P. Doreian & F. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of social networks: 1-18. London: Gordon and Breach.
29.
Earley, P. C.1993. East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 319-348.
30.
Earley, P. C.1994. Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 89-117.
31.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E.2000. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 26-49.
32.
Erickson, B.1988. The relation basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach: 99-121. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Farh, J. L., Cannella, A. B., & Bedeian, A. G.1991. Peer ratings: Impact of purpose on rating quality and user acceptance. Group and Organization Studies, 16: 367-386.
34.
Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Lin, Z. 1996. Individual reactions to perceived equity in teamwork: Do differences in individualism-collectivism matter? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
35.
Faucheux, C., & Moscovici, S.1960. Études sur la créativité des groups taches, structures des communications, et réussite. Bulletin du C. E. R., 9: 11-22.
36.
Festinger, L.1957. Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Freeman, L. C.1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweeness. Sociometry, 40: 35-41.
38.
Freeman, L. C.1978-1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1: 215-239.
39.
Friedkin, N. E.1984. Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods and Research, 12: 235-261.
40.
Friedkin, N. E., & Cook, K. S.1990. Peer group influence. Sociological Methods and Research, 9: 122-143.
41.
Galaskiewicz, J.1979. The structure of community organizational networks. Social Forces, 57: 1346-1364.
42.
Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S.1994. Introduction. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences: xi-xvii. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Gerlach, M. L.1992. The Japanese corporate network: A blockmodel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 105-139.
44.
Gersick, C. J. G.1988. Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 9-41.
45.
Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R.1990. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47: 65-97.
46.
Gibson, C. B.1999. Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 138-152.
47.
Gibson, C. B., Randel, A., & Earley, P. C.2000. Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group and Organization Management, 25: 67-97.
48.
Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F.2003. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 202-239.
49.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R.1992. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17: 183-211.
50.
Gloria, J., Bazzoli, G. J., Chan, B., Shortell, S. M., & D’Aunno, T.2000. The financial performance of hospitals belonging to health networks and systems. Inquiry—Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, 37: 234-252.
51.
Granovetter, M.1985. Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
52.
Greenberg, J.1987. The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review, 12: 157-159.
53.
Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M.2002. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 819-832.
54.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P.1993. Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 87-106.
55.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T.2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1029-1045.
56.
Harrison, J. R., & Carroll, G. R.1991. Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 552-582.
57.
Hofstede, G.1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Hollenbeck, J. R., Klein, H. J., O’Leary, A. M., & Wright, P. M.1989. Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 951-959.
59.
Homans, C. D.1950. The human group. New York: Harcourt.
60.
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S.1993. Power, social influence and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perception. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 277-303.
61.
James, L. R.1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219-229.
62.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G.1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.
63.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A.2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 238-251.
64.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B.2000. Foundations of behavioral research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
65.
Klein, H. J., & Mulvey, P. W.1995. Two investigations of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61: 44-54.
66.
Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P.2001. The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85: 32-55.
67.
Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S.1983. Prominence. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis: 195-222. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
68.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J.1982. Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
69.
Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., & Gray, B.1998. Social network and perception of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 55-67.
70.
Leavitt, H. J.1951. Some effects of communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 38-50.
71.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L.1990. Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 585-634.
72.
Lin, Z., & Hui, C.1999. Should lean replace mass organization systems: A theoretical examination from a management coordination perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 45-80.
73.
Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B.1995. Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20: 645-678.
74.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P.1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
75.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro S. J.2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.
76.
Martell, R. F., & Leavitt, K. N.2003. Reducing the performance-cue bias in work behavior ratings: Can groups help?Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 1032-1041.
77.
Mayhew, B. H.1980. Structuralism versus individualism: Part I, Shadowboxing in the dark. Social Forces, 59: 335-375.
78.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J.2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for work-place performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 121-146.
79.
Mesch, D. J., Farh, J., & Podsakoff, P. M.1994. Effects of feedback sign on group goal setting, strategies, and performance. Group and Organization Management, 19: 309-333.
80.
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R.1993. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1175-1195.
81.
Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E.1991. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 165-187.
82.
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D.1994. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1285-1301.
83.
Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J.2003. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92: 102-112.
84.
Pfeffer, J.1982. Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pitman.
85.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., & Ahearne, M.1997. Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationships between group cohesiveness and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 974-983.
86.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. T., Hinings, C. R., MacDonald, K. M., Turner, C., & Lupton, T.1963. A conceptual scheme for organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8: 289-315.
87.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W.2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12: 502-517.
88.
Robbins, T. L., Summers, T. P., Miller, J. L., & Hendrix, W. H.2000. Using the group-value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 511-518.
89.
Robins, J. A., & Lin, Z.2000. Institutional influences on organizational control: A comparative examination of agency theory in Sino-Japanese and Sino-American joint ventures. Advances in International Comparative Management, 13: 119-148.
90.
Salancik, G. R.1995. Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 345-349.
91.
Schmitt, N. W., & Klimoski, R. J.1991. Research methods in human resources management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
92.
Schweiger, D. M., & Sandberg, W. R.1989. The utilization of individual capabilities in group approach. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 31-44.
93.
Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A.1987. Group effectiveness: What really matters?Sloan Management Review, 28: 25-31.
94.
Simon, H. A.1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106:467-482.
95.
Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M., & Floyd, S. W.2003. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29: 427-442.
96.
Smith, K. G., Locke, E. A., & Barry, D.1990. Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46: 118-134.
97.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L.2001. Social network and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 316-325.
98.
Stevens, J. P.2002. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
99.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H.1959. The social psychological of groups. New York: John Wiley.
100.
Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S.1996. The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed work groups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17: 349-363.
101.
Tremblay, M., Sire, B., & Balkin, D. B.2000. The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes. Group and Organization Management, 25: 269-290.
102.
Triandis, H. C.1994. Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 103-172. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
103.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. C.1977. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2: 419-427.
104.
Ward, E. A.1993. Generalizability of psychological research from undergraduates to employed adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 133: 513-519.
105.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K.1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
106.
Watson, W. E., & Merritt, D.1998. Team orientation, self-orientation, and diversity in task groups. Group and Organization Management, 23: 161-188.
107.
Waung, M., & Brice, T. S.1998. The effects of conscientiousness and opportunity to caucus on group performance. Small Group Research, 29: 624-635.
108.
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M.2001. Impact of highly and less-job related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta analysis. Journal of Management, 27: 141-162.
109.
Wellman, B.1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach: 477-497. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110.
Zucker, L. G.1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 53-111.
