This research explores the use of impression management tactics in combination. Two studies were conducted to identify three profiles of impression management use and to examine how three individual difference variables are related to these patterns. The results suggest that women are less aggressive than men in using impression management, that high self-monitors favor positive impression management strategies, and that high Machs use impression management tactics rather indiscriminately. The findings also suggest that individuals who either avoid using impression management or who use only positive tactics are seen more favorably than those who use relatively high levels of all types of impression management. Some implications and directions for future research are discussed as well.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, T. E., & Martin, S. L.1995. Trying to look bad at work: Methods and motives for managing poor impressions in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 174–199.
2.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H.1999. Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2: 187–206.
3.
Bozeman, D. P., & Kacmar, K. M.1997. A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69: 9–30.
4.
Briggs, S., & Cheek, J.1986. The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54: 106–148.
5.
Christie, R., & Geis, F.1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Crant, J. M.1996. Doing more harm than good: When is impression management likely to evoke a negative response?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26: 1454–1471.
7.
Eagly, A. H.1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G.1992. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111: 3–22.
9.
Fandt, P. M., & Ferris, G. R.1990. The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45: 140–158.
10.
Farmer, S. M., & Maslyn, J. M.1999. Why are styles of upward influence neglected? Making the case for a configurational approach to influences. Journal of Management, 25: 653–682.
11.
Farmer, S. M., Maslyn, J. M., Fedor, D. B., & Goodman, J. S.1997. Putting upward influence strategies in context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 17–42.
12.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F.1995. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7: 286–299.
13.
Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J.1988. Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management, 14: 321–338.
14.
Ickes, W., Reidhead, S., & Patterson, M.1986. Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you”. Social Cognition, 4: 58–74.
15.
Jones, E. E.1990. Interpersonal perception. New York: W.H. Freeman.
16.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S.1982. Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self: Vol. 1, 231–262. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D.1994. Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management, 20: 43–65.
18.
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M.1983. An influence perspective on bargaining. In M. Bazerman & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations: 303–319. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M.1988. Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 528–542.
20.
Law, K. S., Wong, C., & Mobley, W. H.1998. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23: 741–755.
21.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M.1990. Impression management: A literature review and two component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34–47.
22.
Rosenfeld, P. R., Giacalone, R. A., & Riordan, C. A.1995. Impression management in organizations: Theory, measurement, and practice. New York: Routledge.
23.
Sharma, S.1996. Applied multivariate techniques. New York: Wiley.
24.
Snyder, M.1974. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30: 526–537.
25.
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S.1986. On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 125–139.
26.
Tedeschi, J. T., & Melburg, V.1984. Impression management and influence in the organization. In S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: Vol. 3, 31–58. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27.
Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C.2001. Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 351–360.
28.
Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R.1990. Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 487–499.
