Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background: There is a compelling need to determine the benefits of sophisticated, costly, and potentially hazardous nutrition support interventions. The clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of specialized nutrition support must be quantitatively defined. Creation of a national outcomes research consortium to study the use of specialized nutrition support can meet these objectives. Methods: Nutrition support and outcomes research literature were reviewed to develop a model for the application of outcomes research methods to clinical, professional, administrative, and financial problems currently challenging the discipline of nutrition support. Results: A multi-institutional nutrition support outcomes research consortium involving creation of a large, practice-based data base is proposed. Relevant clinical, administrative, methodologic, and implementation issues are discussed. Conclusions: A multi-institutional nutrition support outcomes research consortium offers the means to collect rigorous data that can be used to improve patient outcomes, improve the cost-effectiveness of nutrition support, establish a firm scientific basis for the discipline of nutrition support, and assist nutrition support clinicians in the cost-cutting climate that currently characterizes health care in the United States. Given the timeliness of these objectives and the human, professional, and financial costs of not achieving them in a timely fashion, it is fair to ask of a nutrition support outcomes research consortium, "If not now, when?" Uournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 20:394-400, 1996)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Iglehart JK : The American health care system. Introduction. New Engl J Med 326:962-967, 1992

Iglehart JK : The American health care system. Medicare. New Engl J Med 327:1467-1472,1992

Blaiss MS : Why outcomes? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 74:359-360, 1995

Tanenbaum SJ : What physicians know. New Engl J Med 329:1268-1270, 1993

King AB : Measurement of nutrition and health care outcome. Nutrition 9:568, 1993

Merkens BJ : Measuring outcomes of nutrition intervention. J Can Dietetic Assoc 55:64-68, 1994

August DA : Outcomes research, nutrition support, and nutrition care practice . Top Clin Nutr 10:1-16, 1995

American College of Physicians Position Paper: Parenteral nutrition in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 110:734-736, 1989

Klein S. , Koretz RL : Nutrition support in patients with cancer: What do the data really show? NCP 9:91-100, 1994

10.

The Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Cooperative Study Group : Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. New Engl J Med 325:525-532, 1991

11.

Cerra FB McPherson JP Konstantinides FN , et al: Enteral nutrition does not prevent multiple organ failure syndrome (MOFS) after sepsis. Surgery 104:727-733, 1988

12.

Moore FA , Feliciano DV , Andrassy RJ , et al: Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral. reduces postoperative septic complications. The results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 216:172-183. 1992

13.

Epstein AM : The outcomes movement-Will it get us where we want to go? New Engl J Med 323:266-270, 1990

14.

Wennberg J. Gittelsohn A. : Small area variations in health care delivery . Science 182:1102-1108, 1973

15.

Wennberg JE , Freeman JL , Culp WJ : Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston? Lancet 1:1185-1189, 1987

16.

Gabel J. , Liston D. , Jensen G. , et al: The health insurance picture in 1993: Some rare good news. Health Aff (Millwood) 13:327-336, 1994

17.

Greenfield S. , Nelson EC , Zubkoff M. , et al: Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 267:1624-1630, 1992

18.

Hannan EL , Kilburn H. Jr , Racz M. , et al: Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 271:761-766, 1994

19.

Chassin MR , Hannan EL , DeBuono BA : Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. New Engl J Med 334:394-398, 1996

20.

Wesley JR : Nutrition support teams: Past, present, and future. NCP 10:219-228, 1995

21.

Coffey RJ , Richards JS , Remmert CS , et al: An introduction to critical paths. Quality Management in Health Care 1:45-54, 1992

22.

Schriefer J. : The synergy of pathways and algorithms: Two tools work better than one. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 20:485-499, 1994

23.

Bailit H. , Federico J. , McGivney W. : Use of outcomes studies by a managed care organization: Valuing measured treatment effects. Medical Care 33:AS216-225, 1995

24.

Kitzhaber JA : Prioritizing health services in an era of limits: The Oregon experience. Br Med J 307:373, 1993

25.

Dubois RW , Rogers WH , Moxley JH , et al: Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality? New Engl J Med 317:1674-1680, 1987

26.

Greenfield S. , Aronow HU , Elashoff RM , et al: Flaws in mortality data. The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease. JAMA 260:2253-2255, 1988

27.

Green J. , Wintfeld N. , Sharkey P. , et al: The importance of severity of illness in assessing hospital mortality. JAMA 263:241-246, 1990

28.

Park RE , Brook RH , Kosecoff J. , et al: Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. JAMA 264:484-490, 1990

29.

Green J. , Passman LJ , Wintfeld N. : Analyzing hospital mortality. The consequences of diversity in patient mix . JAMA 265:1849-1853, 1991

30.

Moses LE : Measuring effects without randomized trials? Options, problems, challenges. Medical Care 33:AS8-14, 1995

31.

Khuri SF , Daley J. , Henderson W. , et al: The National Veterans Administration surgical risk study: Risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care . J Am Coll Surg 180:519-531, 1995

32.

Blumberg MS : Risk adjusting health care outcomes: A methodologic review. Medical Care Rev 43:351-393, 1986

33.

Roos LL , Sharp SM , Cohen MM , et al: Risk adjustment in claims-based research: The search for efficient approaches. J Clin Epidemiol 42:1193-1206, 1989

34.

Rontal R. , Kiess MJ , DesHarnais S. , et al: Applications for risk-adjusted outcomes measures. Quality Assurance in Health Care 3:283-292, 1991

35.

DesHarnais S. , McMahon LF Jr , Wrobleski R. : Measuring outcomes of hospital care using multiple risk-adjusted indexes. Health Serv Res 26:425-445, 1991

36.

Jencks SF , Daley J. , Draper D. , et al: Interpreting hospital mortality data. The role of clinical risk adjustment. JAMA 260:3611-3616, 1988

37.

Charlson ME , Pompei P. , Ales HL , et al: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373-383, 1987

38.

Fetter RB , Youngsoo S. , Freemen JL , et al: Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med Care 18 (Feb Suppl):1-39, 1980

39.

Marshall G. , Grover FL , Henderson WG , et al: Assessment of predictive models for binary outcomes: An empirical approach using operative death from cardiac surgery. Stat Med 13:1501-1511, 1994

40.

Clintec Nutrition Company : Cost containment through nutrition intervention. Clintec Nutrition Company, Deerfield, IL, 1996

41.

Concato J. , Feinstein AR , Holford TR : The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Int Med 118:201-210, 1993

42.

Sproat KV , Russell CM (eds): Malnutrition. A hidden cost in health care. Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 1993

Creation of a Specialized Nutrition Support Outcomes Research Consortium: If Not Now,When?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References