Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A two part study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational protocol and consult service on parenteral nutrition (PN) utilization. Forty-one patient admissions were evaluated retrospectively and nine prospectively. Average length of hospital stay and number of days on PN were decreased significantly (p <.05). Frequency of adverse effects were also decreased significantly (p <.05). A positive trend toward selection of patients for enteral rather than PN was evidenced. Utilization of already available manpower and financial resources by this modified approach should contribute toward reducing costs and hazards of PN therapy, particularly for smaller hospitals with both limited requirements and resources, as well as for teaching institutions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Kaminski MV , Stolar MH : Parenteral hyperalimentation—a quality of care survey and review. Am J Hosp Pharm 31:220–235, 1974.

2. Center for Disease Control : Infection control in hyperalimentation therapy, Hospital Infections and Microbiologic Control Branches, Bacterial Disease Division, Bureau of Epidemiology, 1972.

3. Curry CR , Quie PG : Fungal septicemia in patients receiving parenteral hyperalimentation. N Eng J Med 285:1221–1224, 1971.

4. Dudrick SJ , Mac Fadyen BV , Souchon EA et al: Parenteral nutrition techniques in cancer patients. Cancer Res 37:2440–2450, 1977.

5. Sanders RA , Sheldon GF : Septic complications of total parenteral nutrition. Am J Surg 132:214–220, 1978.

6. Goldman DA , Maki DG : Infection control in total parenteral nutrition. JAMA 223:1360–1364, 1973.

7. Skoutakis VA , Martinez DR , Dobbie RP : Team approach to total parenteral nutrition. Am J Hosp Pharm 32:693–697, 1975.

8. Ryan JA , Abel RM , Abbott WM et al: Catheter complications in total parenteral nutrition. N Eng J Med 290:757–761, 1974.

9. Blackburn GL , Bistrian BR , Maini BS et al: Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patient. JPEN 1:11–22, 1977.

10.

10. Dillon JD , Schaffner W , Van Way CW et al: Septicemia and total parenteral nutrition—distinguishing catheter from other septic episodes. JAMA 223:1341–1344, 1973.

11.

11. Kaminski MV , Burke WA , Blackburn GL et al: Intravenous Hyperalimentation in Modern Hospital Practice, Tuckahoe, NY, USV Pharmaceutical Corporation, 1977, p 23

12.

12. Hansten, PD : Drug Interactions, 3rd ed., Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1976, p 337.

13.

13. Mac Cara ME , Angaran DM : Cephalosporin—clinitest interaction: comparison of cephalothin, cefazolin and cephradine. Am J Hosp Pharm 35:1064–1067, 1978.

14.

14. Kaminski MV : Establishing a metabolic support service. In Kaminsky, MV (dir): First Annual Advanced Course in Clinical Nutrition, Chicago, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, June 15–17, 1978.

Parenteral Nutrition Utilization: Evaluation of an Educational Protocol and Consult Service

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References