Enteral access is a cornerstone in the provision of nutrition support. Early and adequate enteral support has consistently demonstrated improved patient outcomes throughout a wide range of illness. In patients unable to tolerate oral intake, multiple options of delivery are available to the clinician. Access requires a multidisciplinary effort that involves nurses, dietitians, and physicians to be successful. These techniques and procedures are not without morbidity and even mortality. A comprehensive understanding of the appropriate management of these tubes and their inherent complications should be garnered by all those involved with nutrition support teams. This tutorial reviews available options for enteral access in addition to commonly encountered complications and their management.
HeylandDKDhaliwalRJiangXDayAG. Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R268.
7.
OslandEYunusRMKhanSMemonMA. Early versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(4):473-487.
8.
MarikPEZalogaGP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review [published correction appears in Crit Care Med. 2002;30(3):725]. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(12):2264-2270.
9.
DoigGSHeighesPTSimpsonFSweetmanEA. Early enteral nutrition reduces mortality in trauma patients requiring intensive care: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Injury. 2011;42(1):50-56.
10.
Munera-SeeleyVOchoaJBBrownN. Use of a colorimetric carbon dioxide sensor for nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critical care patients compared with clinical methods and radiography. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(3):318-321.
11.
BercikPSchlageterVMauroM. Noninvasive verification of nasogastric tube placement using a magnet-tracking system: a pilot study in healthy subjects. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29(4):305-310.
van den BoschSWittemanEKhoYTanAC. Erythromycin to promote bedside placement of a self-propelled nasojejunal feeding tube in non-critically ill patients having pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26(2):181-185.
14.
GattMMacFieJ. Bedside postpyloric feeding tube placement: a pilot series to validate this novel technique. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(2):523-527.
15.
PragerRLaboyVVenusB. Value of fluoroscopic assistance during transpyloric intubation. Crit Care Med. 1986;14(2):151-152.
16.
HuertaGPuriVK. Nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients (fluoroscopy versus blind). Nutrition. 2000;16(4):264-267.
17.
DeLeggeMH. Enteral access—the foundation of feeding: endoscopic nasoenteric tube placement. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;3(1):22-29.
18.
ZhangLHuangYHYaoWChangHGuoCJLinSR. Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in patients with severe upper gastrointestinal diseases. J Dig Dis. 2012;13(6):310-315.
19.
González PenaMFiguerola MassanaEHernández GutiérrezPRello CondominesJ. Middle ear effusion in mechanically ventilated patients: effects of the nasogastric tube. Respir Care. 2013;58(2):273-278.
20.
GeorgeDLFalkPSUmberto MeduriG. Nosocomial sinusitis in patients in the medical intensive care unit: a prospective epidemiological study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(3):463-470.
21.
van ZantenARDixonJMNipshagenMDde BreeRGirbesARPoldermanKH. Hospital-acquired sinusitis is a common cause of fever of unknown origin in orotracheally intubated critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2005;9(5):R583-R590.
22.
McClaveSASextonLKSpainDA. Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impeding adequate delivery. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1252-1256.
23.
SederCWStockdaleWHaleLJanczykRJ. Nasal bridling decreases feeding tube dislodgment and may increase caloric intake in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):797-801.
BrousseauVJKostKM. A rare but serious entity: nasogastric tube syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(5):677-679.
26.
SparksDAChaseDMCoughlinLMPerryE. Pulmonary complications of 9931 narrow-bore nasoenteric tubes during blind placement: a critical review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(5):625-629.
27.
MardersteinESimmonsROchoaJ. Effect of institutional protocols on adverse events related to feeding tube placement in the critically ill. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:39-50.
28.
LeeJMFernandezFStaffIMahJW. Web-based teaching module improves success rates of postpyloric positioning of nasoenteric feeding tubes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36(3):323-329.
29.
SobaniZUGhaffarSAhmedBN. Comparison of outcomes of enteral feeding via nasogastric versus gastrostomy tubes in post operative patients with a principle diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(10):1042-1045.
30.
McClaveSALukanJKStefaterJA. Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(2):324-330.
31.
NortonBHomer-WardMDonnellyMTLongRGHolmesGK. A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. BMJ. 1996;312(7022):13-16.
32.
DwolatzkyTBerezovskiSFriedmannR. A prospective comparison of the use of nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes for long-term enteral feeding in older people. Clin Nutr. 2001;20(6):535-540.
33.
GaudererMWPonskyJLIzantRJJr.Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15(6):872-875.
34.
GinsbergGG. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;3(1):42-49.
35.
AllenJWSpainDA. Open and laparoscopic surgical techniques for obtaining enteral access. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;3(1):50-54.
36.
KhaodhiarLBlackburnG. Enteral nutrition support. In: FischerJE. Mastery of surgery, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001: 45-55.
37.
vanSonnenbergEWittichGRGoodacreBW. Radiologic percutaneous gastrostomy and related enterostomies. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;3(1):16-21.
38.
ShinJHParkAW. Updates on percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy and jejunostomy. Gut Liver. 2010;4(suppl 1):S25-S31.
39.
MapleJTPetersenBTBaronTHGostoutCJWong Kee SongLMButtarNS. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: outcomes in 307 consecutive attempts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(12):2681-2688.
40.
WollmanBD’AgostinoHBWalus-WigleJREasterDWBealeA. Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature. Radiology. 1995;197:699-704.
41.
BankheadRRFisherCARolandelliRH. Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20(6):607-612.
42.
LjungdahlMSundbomM. Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(8):1248-1251.
43.
SteedHBarrettDEmmC. Unsedated percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion: a safe, effective, and well-tolerated method. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012Mar;36(2):231-234.
44.
StellatoTAGaudererMWPonskyJL. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy following previous abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 1984;200:46-50.
45.
StiegmannGVGoffJSSilasDPearlmanNSunJNortonL. Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:1-5.
46.
EleftheriadiasEKotzampassiK. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy after abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:213-216.
47.
StockeldDFagerbergJGranstromL. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for nutrition in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:839-844.
48.
BochicchioGVGuzzoJLScaleaTM. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the supermorbidly obese patient. JSLS. 2006;10(4):409-413.
49.
KimJSParkYWKimHK. Is percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement safe in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts?World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3148-3152.
50.
BaltzJGArgoCKAl-OsaimiAMNorthupPG. Mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with cirrhosis: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(5):1072-1075.
51.
KaurSCeballosCBaoRPittmanNBenkovK. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(3):300-303.
52.
ChungRSSchertzerM. Pathogenesis of complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a lesson in surgical principles. Am Surg. 1990;56(3):134-137.
53.
McCarterTLCondonSCAguilarRCGibsonDJChenYK. Randomized prospective trial of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(3):419-421.
54.
SteinJSchulte-BockholtASabinMKeymlingM. A randomized prospective trial of immediate vs. next-day feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(11):1656-1660.
55.
McClaveSADemeoMTDeleggeMH. North American Summit on aspiration in the critically ill patient: consensus statement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26:S80-S85.
56.
WejdaBUDeppeHHuchzermeyerHDormannAJ. PEG placement in patients with ascites: a new approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(1):178-180.
57.
HébuterneXVanbiervlietG. Feeding the patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011;14(2):197-201.
58.
AndersonMABen-MenachemTGanSI; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(6):1060-1070.
59.
Lozoya-GonzalezDPelaez-LunaMFarca-BelsaguyASalceda-OteroJCVazquez-BallesterosE. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complication rates and compliance with the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines for the management of antithrombotic therapy. JPEN J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2012;36(2):226-230.
60.
BartonCAMcMillianWDOslerT. Anticoagulation management around percutaneous bedside procedures: is adjustment required?J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(4):815-820.
61.
ChaudharyKASmithOJCuddyPGClarkstonWK. PEG site infections: the emergence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a major pathogen. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(7):1713-1716.
62.
CaveDRRobinsonWRBrotschiEA. Necrotizing fasciitis following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;32(4):294-296.
63.
MartindaleRWitteMHodgesGKelleyJHarrisSAndersenC. Necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(6):583-585.
LauGLaiSH. Fatal retroperitoneal haemorrhage: an unusual complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;116(1):69-75.
70.
ChongCDerigoLBrownD. Massive gastric bleeding: a rarely seen subacute complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Intern Med J. 2007;37(11):787-788.
71.
RichterJAPatrieJTRichterRP. Bleeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is linked to serotonin reuptake inhibitors, not aspirin or clopidogrel. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(1):22-34.e1.
72.
BlombergJLagergrenJMartinLMattssonFLagergrenP. Complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):737-742.
73.
McClaveSAChangWK. Complications of enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(5):739-751.
74.
DulabonGRAbramsJERutherfordEJ. The incidence and significance of free air after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am Surg. 2002;68(6):590-593.
75.
WiesenAJSideridisKFernandesA. True incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after PEG placement: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(6):886-889.
76.
SriramKJayanthiVLakshmiRGGeorgeVS. Prophylactic locking of enteral feeding tubes with pancreatic enzymes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21(6):353-356.
77.
BlackaJDonoghueJSutherlandM. Dwell time and functional failure in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective randomized-controlled comparison between silicon polymer and polyurethane percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(8):875-882.
78.
El-RifaiNMichaudLMentionK. Persistence of gastrocutaneous fistula after removal of gastrostomy tubes in children: prevalence and associated factors. Endoscopy. 2004;36(8):700-704.
79.
Gonzalez-OjedaAAvalos-GonzalezJMucino-HernandezMI. Fibrin glue as adjuvant treatment for gastrocutaneous fistula after gastrostomy tube removal. Endoscopy. 2004;36(4):337-341.
80.
HameedHKalimSKhanYI. Closure of a nonhealing gastrocutanous fistula using argon plasma coagulation and endoscopic hemoclips. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(3):217-219.
81.
TeitelbaumJEGorceySAFoxVL. Combined endoscopic cautery and clip closure of chronic gastrocutaneous fistulas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(3):432-435.
KleinSHeareBRSolowayRD. The “buried bumper syndrome”: a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85(4):448-451.
84.
RosenbergerLHNewhookTSchirmerBSawyerRG. Late accidental dislodgement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube: an underestimated burden on patients and the health care system. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3307-3311.
85.
GalatSAGerigKDPorterJASlezakFA. Management of premature removal of the percutaneous gastrostomy. Am Surg. 1990;56(11):733-736.
86.
ChaerRARekkasDTrevinoJBrownREspatJ. Intrahepatic placement of a PEG tube. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57(6):763-765.
ShawJCaseyK. A PEG tube through the liver. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(5):1323-1324.
89.
SaltzbergDMAnandKJuvanPJoffeI. Colocutaneous fistula: an unusual complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):86-87.
90.
BergerSAZarlingEJ. Colocutaneous fistula following migration of PEG tube. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(1):86-88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
