A Computerized Insulin Infusion Titration Protocol Improves Glucose Control With Less Hypoglycemia Compared to a Manual Titration Protocol in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit

Abstract

Background: Previous studies reflect reduced morbidity and mortality with intensive blood glucose control in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, implementation of such protocols has proved challenging. This study evaluated the degree of glucose control using manual paper-based vs computer-based insulin protocols in a trauma intensive care unit. Methods: Of 1455 trauma admissions from May 31 to December 31, 2005, a cohort of 552 critically ill patients met study entry criteria. The patients received intensive blood glucose management with IV insulin infusions. Using Fisher's exact test, the authors compared patients managed with a computerized protocol vs a paper-based insulin protocol with respect to the portion of glucose values in a target range of 80–110 mg/dL, the incidence of hyperglycemia (≥150 mg/dL), and the incidence of hypoglycemia (≤40 mg/dL). Results: Three hundred nine patients were managed with a manual paper-based protocol and 243 were managed with a computerized protocol. The total number of blood glucose values across both groups was 21,178. Mean admission glucose was higher in the computer-based protocol group (170 vs 152 mg/dL; p < .001, t-test). Despite this finding by Fisher's exact test, glucose control was superior in the computerized group; a higher portion of glucose values was in range 80–110 mg/dL (41.8% vs 34.0%; p < .001), less hyperglycemia occurred (12.8% vs 15.1%; p < .001), and less hypoglycemia occurred (0.2% vs 0.5%; p < .001). Conclusions: A computerized insulin titration protocol improves glucose control by (1) increasing the percentage of glucose values in range, (2) reducing hyperglycemia, and (3) reducing severe hypoglycemia.

For a carefully defined cohort of 552 critically ill, ventilated trauma patients, a computerized insulin glycemia control protocol was compared to a previous manual protocol. Targeting 80–110 mg/dL, the computerized protocol significantly reduced hyperglycemia, with fewer hypoglycemic episodes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wolfe RR, Allsop JR, Burke JF. Glucose metabolism in man: responses to intravenous glucose infusion. Metabolism. 1979 ;28:210– 220.

Kyle C, Baker J, Metcalf P, Johnson R, Norris R. Serum fructosamine as a screening method for diabetes mellitus in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Aust N Z J Med. 1987 ;17:467– 471.

Miller JA, Floras JS, Zinman B, Skorecki KL, Logan AG. Effect of hyperglycaemia on arterial pressure, plasma renin activity and renal function in early diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond). 1996 ;90:189– 195.

Collier B, Diaz J Jr, Forbes R, et al. The impact of a normoglycemic management protocol on clinical outcomes in the trauma intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005 ;29:353– 359.

Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001 ;345:1359– 1367.

Latham R, Lancaster AD, Covington JF, Pirolo JS, Thomas CS. The association of diabetes and glucose control with surgical-site infections among cardiothoracic surgery patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22:607– 612.

Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 ;87:978– 982.

IHI.org. Severe sepsis bundles. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/CriticalCare/Sepsis/. Accessed January 8, 2007.

Surving Sepsis Campaign. Available at: http://ssc.sccm.org/bundles/individual_changes/maintain_glycemic. Accessed November 1, 2007.

10.

Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2007. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl 1): S4–S41.

11.

Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:858– 873.

12.

Boord JB, Sharifi M, Greevy RA, et al. Computer-based insulin infusion protocol improves glycemia control over manual protocol. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:278– 287.

13.

White NH, Skor D, Santiago JV. Practical closed-loop insulin delivery: a system for the maintenance of overnight euglycemia and the calculation of basal insulin requirements in insulin-dependent diabetics.Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:210– 213.

14.

Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method: Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987 ;27:370– 378.

15.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC definitions of nosocomial infections. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/nnis/NosInfDefinitions.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2007.

16.

Anger KE, Szumita PM. Barriers to glucose control in the intensive care unit. Pharmacotherapy. 2006 ;26:214– 228.

17.

Braithwaite SS, Edkins R, Macgregor KL, et al. Performance of a dose-defining insulin infusion protocol among trauma service intensive care unit admissions. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006 ;8:476– 488.

18.

Brown G, Dodek P. Intravenous insulin nomogram improves blood glucose control in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2001 ;29:1714– 1719.

19.

Goldberg PA, Sakharova OV, Barrett PW, et al. Improving glycemic control in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit: clinical experience in two hospital settings. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 ;18:690– 697.

20.

Goldberg PA, Siegel MD, Sherwin RS, et al. Implementation of a safe and effective insulin infusion protocol in a medical intensive care unit.Diabetes Care. 2004;27:461– 467.

21.

Kanji S, Singh A, Tierney M, Meggison H, McIntyre L, Hebert PC. Standardization of intravenous insulin therapy improves the efficiency and safety of blood glucose control in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:804– 810.

22.

Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2004;79:992– 1000.

23.

Taylor BE, Schallom ME, Sona CS, et al. Efficacy and safety of an insulin infusion protocol in a surgical ICU. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 ;202:1– 9.

24.

Zimmerman CR, Mlynarek ME, Jordan JA, Rajda CA, Horst HM. An insulin infusion protocol in critically ill cardiothoracic surgery patients.Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1123– 1129.

25.

Davidson PC, Steed RD, Bode BW. Glucommander: a computer-directed intravenous insulin system shown to be safe, simple, and effective in 120,618 h of operation. Diabetes Care. 2005 ;28:2418– 2423.

26.

Vogelzang M, Zijlstra F, Nijsten MW. Design and implementation of GRIP: a computerized glucose control system at a surgical intensive care unit.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 ;5:38 .

27.

Rood E, Bosman RJ, van der Spoel JI, Taylor P, Zandstra DF. Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:172– 180.