Telehealth Videoconferencing: Improving Home Parenteral Nutrition Patient Care to Rural Areas of Ontario,Canada

Abstract

Background: Telehealth videoconferencing is a medium for health care professionals to communicate and care for patients living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to provide a survey to examine management outcome of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients when followed by telehealth as an alternative modality of care. Methods: Twenty-six individuals who were identified to benefit from tele-health were invited to participate in a satisfaction survey. The survey was sent to patients by postal mail. The survey also documented the incidence of line sepsis and other medical HPN complications. A cost analysis was also performed according to technology, human resources, and infrastructure. Results: Eighty-one telehealth videoconference sessions have been held since the inception of telehealth in 2002. Of the current telehealth patients, 13 were eligible for the survey. The satisfaction survey response rate was 11/13 (84.6%). The average line sepsis rate for the 13 patients was 0.89/1000 catheter-days. All patients were generally satisfied with videoconferencing as an alternative method of communication and care for new consultation, patient and family education, and follow-up. Travel time and costs to the patients, their families, and the health care system were significantly less. For example, a patient who resides 611 km from Toronto would cost CDN (Canadian) $724.00 for flight and accommodation to meet with the team at the HPN clinic in Toronto. Conclusion: Telehealth incorporated the cost-saving ability for HPN patients to maintain proper medical care, support, and collaboration of specialists inaccessible to their local community. Thus, its strongly positive role in HPN care deserves further consideration for a national application.

Telehealth facilitates the delivery of healthcare to remotely located patients. Through telehealth, home parenteral nutrition patients experience continuity of medical care, multidisciplinary support, and cost savings by remaining in their home community.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ricke J, Bartelink H. Telemedicine and its impact on cancer management. Eur J Cancer. 2000 ;36:826– 833.

Health Canada. Canada Health Act overview [Health Canada website]. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahcasc/media/nr-cp/2002/2002_care-soinsbk4_e.html. Accessed March 9, 2006.

Picot J. Telemedicine and Telehealth in Canada: forty years of change in the use of information and communications technologies in a publicly administered health care system. Telemed J. 1998 ;4:199– 205.

Health Canada. North Network Program [Health Canada website]. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/chipp-ppics/2003-north/north_intro_f.html. Accessed March 9, 2006.

Chang A, Enns R, Saqui O, Chatur N, Whittaker S, Allard JP. Line sepsis in home parenteral nutrition patients: are there socioeconomic risk factors? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005 ;29:408– 412.

Public Affairs and Communications Department, University Health Network. Strategic Directions @ UHN. Toronto, Canada: Public Affairs and Communications Department, University Health Network;2002 .

UHN. Patient-centered care: corporate intranet. Available at: http://intranet.uhn.ca/home/patient_centered_care/about.asp. Accessed May 25, 2006.

Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. Client centered care.Nursing Best Practice Guideline Shaping the Future of Nursing. Ontario, Canada: Registered Nurses Association; July 2002 .

Tsilimigaki A, Maraka S, Tsekoura T, et al. Eighteen months' experience with remote diagnosis, management and education in congenital heart disease. J Telemed Telecare. 2001 ;7:239– 243.

10.

Kiuru MJ, Paakkala TA, Kallio TT, Aalto J, Rajamaki M. Effect of teleradiology on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients in a primary care centre. J Telemed Telecare. 2002 ;8:25– 31.

11.

Spencer JA, Dobson D, Hoara M, Molyneux AJ, Anslow PL. The use of a computerized image transfer system linking a regional neuroradiology centre to its district hospitals. Clin Radiol. 1991 ;44:342– 344.

12.

Loane MA, Corbett R, Bloomer SE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical management by real time teledermatology: results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:95– 100.

13.

Randolph GR, Hagler DJ, Khandheria DK, et al. Remote tele-medical interpretation of neonatal echocardiograms: impact on clinical management in a primary care setting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 ;34:241– 245.

14.

Hayes WS, Tohme WG, Komo D, et al. A telemedicine consultative service for the evaluation of patients with urolithiasis.Urology. 1998;51:39– 43.

15.

Harno K, Arajarvi E, Paavola T, Carlson C, Viikinkoski P. Clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of patient referral by video-conferencing in orthopedics. J Telemed Telecare. 2001 ;7:219– 225.

16.

Perednia DA, Wallace J, Morrisey M, et al. The effect of a teledermatology program on rural referral patterns to dermatologists and the management of skin disease. Medinfo. 1998 ;9:290– 293.

17.

Tachakra S, Loane M, Uche CU. A follow-up study of remote trauma teleconsultations. J Telemed Telecare. 2000 ;6:330– 334.

18.

Walters TJ. Deployment telemedicine: the Walter Reed Army Medical Center experience. Mil Med. 1996 ;161:531– 536.

19.

Craig J, Chua R, Wootton R, Patterson V. A pilot study of telemedicine for new neurological outpatient referrals. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:225– 228.

20.

Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1241– 1247.

21.

Statistics Canada. Population urban and rural, by province and territory [Statistics Canada website]. Available at: http://www40.statcan.ca. Accessed March 8, 2006.

22.

Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch HG. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up.JAMA. 1992;267:1788– 1793.

23.

Noel HC, Vogel DC, Erdos JJ, Cornwall D, Levin F. Home telehealth reduces health care costs. Telemed J E Health. 2004 ;10:170– 183.

24.

Kobza L, Scheurich A. The impact of telemedicine on outcomes of chronic bounds in the home care setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 ;46:48– 54.

25.

Mair F, Wilkinson M, Bonnar SA, Wootton R, Angus RM. The role of telecare in the management of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the home. J Telemed Telecare. 1999 ;5(suppl 1):S66– S67.

26.

Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face-to-face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000 ;2:CD002098 .

27.

Health Telematics Unit, University of Calgary. Final report: socio-economic impact of telehealth: evidence now for health care in the future. State of the Science Report. 2003;1 .