Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) and Gastric Contents Measurement by Refractometry

Abstract

Background: Traditional use of gastric residual volumes (GRVs), obtained by aspiration from a nasogastric tube, is inaccurate and cannot differentiate components of the gastric contents (gastric secretion vs delivered formula). The use of refractometry and 3 mathematical equations has been proposed as a method to calculate the formula concentration, GRV, and formula volume. In this paper, we have validated these mathematical equations so that they can be implemented in clinical practice. Methods: Each of 16 patients receiving a nasogastric tube had 50 mL of water followed by 100 mL of dietary formula (Osmolite HN, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH) infused into the stomach. After mixing, gastric content was aspirated for the first Brix value (BV) measurement by refractometry. Then, 50 mL of water was infused into the stomach and a second BV was measured. The procedure of infusion of dietary formula (100 mL) and then water (50 mL) was repeated and followed by subsequent BV measurement. The same procedure was performed in an in vitro experiment. Formula concentration, GRV, and formula volume were calculated from the derived mathematical equations. Results: The formula concentrations, GRVs, and formula volumes calculated by using refractometry and the mathematical equations were close to the true values obtained from both in vivo and in vitro validation experiments. Conclusions: Using this method, measurement of the BV of gastric contents is simple, reproducible, and inexpensive. Refractometry and the derived mathematical equations may be used to measure formula concentration, GRV, and formula volume, and also to serve as a tool for monitoring the gastric contents of patients receiving nasogastric feeding.

Refractometry and the derived mathematical equations may be used to measure formula concentration, gastric residual volume, and formula volume in the stomach. This Brix value measurement may be useful in the evaluation of patients with feeding intolerance by improving the overall accuracy and reliability of interpretation of gastric residual volume.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

McClave SA, Snider HL. Clinical use of gastric residual volumes as a monitor for patients on enteral tube feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(6 suppl): S43–S50.

Heyland DK, Drover JW, Dhaliwal R, Greenwood J. Optimizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: role of small bowel feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002 ;26(6 suppl):S51– S57.

Popovich MJ. It's alimentary: early enteral nutrition is better.Crit Care Med. 2001;29:2387– 2388.

Kozlow JH, Berenholtz SM, Garrett E, Dorman T, Pronovost PJ. Epidemiology and impact of aspiration pneumonia in patients undergoing surgery in Maryland, 1999–2000. Crit Care Med. 2003 ;3:1930– 1937.

Lin HC, Van Citters GW. Stopping enteral feeding for arbitrary gastric residual volume may not be physiologically sound: results of a computer simulation model. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997 ;21:286– 289.

Goot SA, Chapman KM, Furman JA. Enteral nutrition support. In: Barbec ME, Erifft J, Hornick B, et al, eds. Manual of Clinical Dietetics. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association;1996 : 277–292.

Kirby DF, Delegge MH, Fleming CR. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition.Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1282– 1301.

McClave SA, Snider HL, Lowen CC, et al. Use of residual volume as a marker for enteral feeding intolerance: prospective blinded comparison with physical examination and radiological findings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:99– 105.

McClave SA, Lukan JK, Stefater JA, et al. Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med. 2005;33:324– 330.

10.

Zaloga GP. The myth of the gastric residual volume. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:449– 450.

11.

DiSario JA. Future considerations in aspiration pneumonia in the critically ill patient: what is not known, areas for future research, and experimental methods. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002 ;26(6 suppl):S75– S79.

12.

Malagelada JR. Physiologic basis and clinical significance of gastric emptying disorders. Dig Dis Sci. 1979 ;24:657– 661.

13.

Vantrappen G. Methods to study gastric emptying. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39(12 suppl): 91S–94S.

14.

Schwizer W, Fraser R, Maecke H, Siebold K, Funck R, Fried M. Gd-DOTA as a gastrointestinal contrast agent for gastric emptying measurements with MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1994 ;31:388– 393.

15.

George JD. New clinical method for measuring the rate of gastric emptying: the double sampling test meal. Gut. 1968 ;9:237– 242.

16.

Chang WK, McClave SA, Lee MS, Chao YC. Monitoring bolus nasogastric tube feeding by the Brix value determination and residual volume measurement of gastric contents. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 ;28:105– 112.

17.

Pomeranz Y, Meloan CE. Refractometry and polarimetry. In: Pomeranz Y, Meloan CE, eds. Food Analysis. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1994: 430–448.

18.

Bradley RL. Moisture and total solids analysis. In: Nielsen SS, ed.Introduction to the Chemical Analysis of Foods . Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 1994:95– 111.

19.

Cheung JF, Chong S, Kitrenos JG, Fung HL. Use of refractometer to detect controlled substance tampering. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 ;48:1488– 1492.

20.

Frankenfield DL, Johnson RE. Refractometry of controlled substances. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 ;48:2129– 2130.

21.

Chang WK, Chen MZ, Chao YC. Use of the refractometer as a tool to monitor dietary formula concentration in gastric juice. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:521– 525.

22.

Meyer GE, Novielli KA, Smith JE. Use of refractive index measurement for quality assurance of pediatric parenteral nutrition solutions.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1987;44:1617– 1620.

23.

Chang WK, McClave SA, Chao YC. Theoretical model using refractometry and a dilution technique to detect residual volume of formula present in a solution. Gastroenterology. 2003 ;124(suppl 1):A429 .

24.

Chang WK, McClave SA, Chao YC. Continuous nasogastric tube feeding: monitoring by combined use of refractometry and traditional gastric residual volume. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:105– 112.

25.

McClave SA, Sexton LK, Spain DA, et al. Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impending adequate delivery. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1252– 1256.

26.

Edwards SJ, Metheny NA. Measurement of gastric residual volume: state of the science. Medsurg Nurs. 2000 ;9:126– 128.