Day-to-Day Variance in Measurement of Resting Metabolic Rate Using Ventilated-Hood and Mouthpiece & Nose-Clip Indirect Calorimetry Systems

Abstract

Background: To know if the magnitude of change in resting metabolic rate (RMR) observed during an intervention is meaningful, it is imperative to first identify the variability that occurs within individuals from day to day under normal conditions. The 2 most common systems used to measure RMR involve a ventilated hood or a mouthpiece & nose clip to collect expired gases. The variation in measurement using these 2 approaches has not been systematically compared. Methods: RMR was measured in 10 healthy adults during 5 separate testing sessions within a 2-week period where usual diet and physical activity were maintained. Each testing session consisted of one measurement of RMR using a ventilated hood system, followed by another using a mouthpiece & nose-clip system. Results: No significant difference in RMR was evident between measurement sessions using either indirect calorimeter. Oxygen consumption and RMR were significantly higher using the mouthpiece & nose-clip system. Average within-individual coefficient of variation for RMR was significantly lower for the ventilated-hood system. RMR measures were consistently lower using the ventilated-hood system by an average of 94.5 ± 63.3 kcal. Day-to-day variance was between 2% and 4% for both systems. Conclusions: The use of either system is appropriate for assessing RMR in clinical and research settings, but alternating between systems should be undertaken with caution. A change in RMR must be greater than ∼6% (96 kcal/d; 1.2 kcal/kg/d) or∼ 8% (135 kcal/d; 1.7 kcal/kg/d) when using a ventilated-hood system or a mouthpiece & nose-clip system, respectively, to observe any meaningful intervention-related differences within individuals.

An increased resting metabolic rate (RMR) could assist overcoming low energy expenditure attributed to the cause of obesity. In order to quantify whether the magnitude of difference in RMR due to an exercise intervention is meaningful, it is imperative to first identify natural variation that occurs within an individual from day to day without training.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gibbons M, Henry C, Ulijaszek S, Lightowler H. Intra-individual variation in RMR in older people. Br J Nutr. 2004 ;91:485– 489.

World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;1998 .

Figueroa-Colon R, Franklin F, Goran M, Lee J, Weinsier R. Reproducibility of measurement of resting energy expenditure in prepubertal girls. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 ;64:533– 536.

Byrne H, Wilmore J. The effects of a 20-week exercise training program on resting metabolic rate in previously sedentary, moderately obese women. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2001 ;11:15– 31.

Speakman J, Selman C. Physical activity and resting metabolic rate.Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62:621– 634.

Segal K. Comparison of indirect calorimetric measurements of resting energy expenditure with a ventilated hood, face mask, and mouthpiece.Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;45:1420– 1423.

Adriaens M, Schoffelen P, Westerterp K. Intra-individual variation of basal metabolic rate and the influence of daily habitual physical activity before testing. Br J Nutr. 2003 ;90:419– 423.

Haugen H, Melanson E, Tran V, Kearney J, Hill J. Variability of measured resting metabolic rate. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 ;78:1141– 1144.

Poehlman ET, Danforth E Jr. Endurance training increases metabolic rate and norepinephrine appearance rate in older individuals. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1991 ;261:E233– E239.

10.

Lemmer J, Ivey F, Ryan A, et al. Effect of strength training on resting metabolic rate and physical activity: age and gender comparisons.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 ;33:532– 541.

11.

Buscemi S, Verga S, Caimi G, Cerasola G. Low relative resting metabolic rate and body weight gain in adult Caucasian Italians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2005;29:287– 291.

12.

Weinsier RL, Hunter GR, Zuckerman PA, et al. Energy expenditure and free-living physical activity in black and white women: comparison before and after weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 ;71:1138– 1146.

13.

Weissman C, Sardar A, Kemper M. In vitro evaluation of a compact metabolic measurement instrument. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990;14:216– 221.

14.

Tissot S, Delafosse B, Bertrand O, Bouffard Y, Viale J, Annat G. Clinical validation of the Deltatrac monitoring system in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 1995 ;21:149– 153.

15.

Welle S. Metabolic responses to a meal during rest and low-intensity exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 ;40:990– 994.

16.

Askanazi J, Silverberg PA, Foster RJ, Hyman AI, Milic-Emili J, Kinney JM. Effects of respiratory apparatus on breathing pattern. J Appl Physiol. 1980;48:577– 580.

17.

Gilbert R, Auchincloss JH Jr, Brodsky J, Boden W. Changes in tidal volume, frequency, and ventilation induced by their measurement. J Appl Physiol. 1972;33:252– 254.

18.

Weissman C, Askanazi J, Milic-Emili J, Kinney JM. Effect of respiratory apparatus on respiration. J Appl Physiol. 1984 ;57:475– 480.

19.

Scott C. Resting metabolic rate variability as influenced by mouthpiece and noseclip practice procedures. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1993;14:573– 577.

20.

Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949 ;109:1– 9.

21.

McArdle W, Katch F, Katch V. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

22.

Littlewood RA, White MS, Bell KL, Davies PSW, Cleghorn GJ, Grote R. Comparison of the Cosmed K4 b2 and the Deltatrac IITM metabolic cart in measuring resting energy expenditure in adults. Clin Nutr. 2002 ;21:491– 497.

23.

Forse R. Comparison of gas exchange measurements with a mouthpiece, face mask, and ventilated canopy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993 ;17:388– 391.

24.

Isbell T, Klesges R, Meyers A, Klesges L. Measurement reliability and reactivity using repeated measurements of resting energy expenditure with a face mask, mouthpiece, and ventilated canopy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991;15:165– 168.

25.

McAnena O, Harvey L, Katzeff H, Daly J. Indirect calorimetry: comparison of hood and mask systems for measuring resting energy expenditure in healthy volunteers. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1986 ;10:555– 557.

26.

McClave S, Spain D, Skolnick J, et al. Achievement of steady state optimizes results when performing indirect calorimetry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:16– 20.

27.

Horner NK, Lampe JW, Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Beresford SA, Prentice RL. Indirect calorimetry protocol development for measuring resting metabolic rate as a component of total energy expenditure in free-living postmenopausal women. J Nutr. 2001 ;131:2215– 2218.