Medical and Psychosocial Experiences of Family Caregivers With Children Fed Enterally at Home

Abstract

Background: Pediatric home enteral nutrition (HEN) studies that evaluate the psychosocial aspects of caregiving are limited. Overlooking the psychosocial needs of the caregiver may result in negative outcomes such as lack of adherence to the HEN regimen. This study determined whether caregivers report psychosocial situations more frequent and difficult to manage than medical situations. Methods: A questionnaire, which identified 10 psychosocial and 10 medical issues related to pediatric HEN, was mailed to 150 caregivers (37 responded), who rated the statements for frequency and difficulty. Each statement was ranked from most frequent/difficult to least frequent/difficult by mean cross-product score (frequency × difficulty). To indicate overall burden, a medical total composite score (MTCS) and a psychosocial total composite score (PTCS) were calculated by summing the cross-products of the respective problems. Paired t tests compared MTCS to PTCS and also the psychosocial frequency means and difficulty means to the same for the medical problems. Results: Of the top 10 problems, 7 were psychosocial, whereas 3 were medical. Caregivers reported incidences of psychosocial problems more frequently (p < .003) than medical problems, and they had more difficulty (p < .001) with the psychosocial situations than with the medical ones. The PTCS was significantly higher (p < .001) than the MTCS. Conclusions: The psychosocial situations were perceived as causing a greater burden and greater difficulty in coping with everyday life. Health professionals need to understand and address the psychosocial difficulties of the caregiver in order to provide support for the caregiver and promote positive growth and development of the child.

Caregivers rated medical and psychosocial situations to determine which were most frequent and difficult. The psychosocial problems were perceived as a greater concern, more of a burden, and causing greater difficulty in coping with everyday life.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cook S, Hooper V, Nasser R, Larsen D. Effect of gastrostomy on growth. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2005 ;66:19– 24.

Bayer LM, Bauers CM, Kapp SR. Psychosocial aspects of nutritional support. Nurs Clin North Am. 1983 ;1:119– 128.

Reeves-Garcia J, Heyman MB. A survey of complications of pediatric home enteral tube feedings and discussions of developmental and psychosocial issues. Nutrition. 1988;5:375– 377.

Hoffman KC. Psychosocial concerns of home nutrition therapy consumers. Nutr Clin Pract. 1989 ;4:51– 56.

Holden CE, Puntis JWL, Charlton CPL, Booth IW. Nasogastric feeding at home: acceptability and safety. Arch Dis Child. 1991 ; 66:148– 151.

Michaelis CA, Warzak WJ, Stanek K, Van Riper C. Parental and professional perceptions of problems associated with long-term pediatric home tube feeding. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 ;92:1235– 1238.

Brotherson MJ, Oakland MJ, Secrist-Mertz C, Litchfield R, Larson K. Quality of life issues for families who make decisions to use a feeding tube for their child with disabilities. J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps. 1995 ;20:202– 212.

Thorne SE, Radford MJ, Armstrong E. Long-term gastrostomy in children: caregiver coping. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1997 ;20:46– 53.

Thorne SE, Radford MJ, McCormick J. The multiple meanings of long-term gastrostomy in children with severe disability. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997;12:89– 99.

10.

Spalding K, McKeever P. Mothers' experiences caring for children with disabilities who require a gastrostomy tube. J Pediatr Nurs. 1998;13:234– 243.

11.

Adams RA, Gordon C, Spangler AA. Maternal stress in caring for children with feeding disabilities: implications for health care providers.J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99:962– 966.

12.

Pedersen SD, Parsons HG, Dewey D. Stress levels experienced by the parents of enterally fed children. Child Care Health Dev. 2004 ;30:507– 513.

13.

Heyman MB, Harmatz P, Acree M, et al. Economic and psychological costs for maternal caregivers of gastrostomy-dependent children. J Pediatr. 2004;145:511– 516.

14.

Montagnino BA, Mauricio RV. The child with a tracheostomy and gastrostomy: parenteral stress and coping in the home-pilot study.Pediatr Nurs. 2004;30:373– 380.

15.

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Children with Disabilities and Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Psychosocial risks of chronic health conditions in childhood and adolescence.Pediatrics. 1993;92:876– 878.

16.

Blecker U, Mehta DI, Davis R, Sothern MS, Suskind RM. Nutritional problems in patients who have chronic disease. Pediatr Rev. 2000 ;21:29– 32.

17.

Schor EL. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family: Family pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on the Family.Pediatrics. 2003;111:1541– 1571.

18.

Bryan J, Osendarp S, Hughes D, Calvaresi E, Baghurst K, van Klinken JW. Nutrients for cognitive development in school-aged children. Nutr Rev. 2004;62:295– 306.

19.

Newacheck PW, Strickland B, Shonkoff JP, et al. An epidemiologic profile of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1998 ;102:117– 123.

20.

Bernal P, Estroff DB, Aboudarham JF, Murphy M, Keller A, Jellinek MS. Psychosocial morbidity: the economic burden in a pediatric health maintenance organization sample. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 ;154:261– 266.

21.

Stein RE. Challenges in long-term health care for children.Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1:280– 288.

22.

Hamlett KW, Pellegrini DS, Katz KS. Childhood chronic illness as a family stressor. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992 ;17:33– 47.

23.

Ray LD, Ritchie JA. Caring for chronically ill children at home: factors that influence parents' coping. J Pediatr Nurs. 1993 ;8:217– 225.

24.

Fisher HR. The needs of parents with chronically sick children: a literature review. J Adv Nur. 2001 ;36:600– 607.

25.

Tong HC, Kandala G, Haig AJ, Nelson VS, Yamakawa KSJ, Shin KY. Physical functioning in female caregivers of children with physical disabilities compared with female caregivers of children with a chronic medical condition. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 ;156:1138– 1142.

26.

Boling W. The health of chronically ill children: lessons learned from assessing family caregiver quality of life. Fam Community Health. 2005;28:176– 183.

27.

Quittner AL, Opipari LC, Espelage DL, Carter B, Eid N, Eigen H. Role strain in couples with and without a child with a chronic illness: associations with marital satisfaction, intimacy, and daily mood.Health Psychol. 1998;17:112– 124.

28.

Cohen MS. Families coping with childhood chronic illness: a research review. Fam Syst Health. 1999 ;17:149– 164.

29.

Williams PD, Williams AR, Hanson S, et al. Maternal mood, family functioning, and perceptions of social support, self-esteem, and mood among siblings of chronically ill children. Child Health Care. 1999 ;28:297– 310.

30.

Ratliffe CE, Harrigan RC, Haley J, Tse A, Olson T. Stress in families with medically fragile children. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2002;25:167– 188.

31.

Esdaile SA, Greenwood KM. A comparison of mothers' and fathers' experience of parenting stress and attributions from parent-child interaction and outcomes. Occup Ther Int. 2003 ;10:115– 126.

32.

Goble LA. The impact of a child's chronic illness on fathers.Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2004 ;27:153– 162.

33.

Bonner MJ, Hardy KK, Guill AB, McLaughlin C, Schweitzer H, Carter K. Development and validation of the parent experience of child illness. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 May 25; [Epub ahead of print], http://jpepsy.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/jsj034v1.

34.

Fleming J, Challela M, Eland J, et al. Impact on the family of children who are technology dependent and cared for in the home.Pediatr Nurs. 1994;20:379– 388.

35.

Baumgardner DJ, Burtea ED. Quality-of-life in technology-dependent children receiving home care and their families: a qualitative study.WMJ. 1998;8:51– 55.

36.

Garro A. Coping patterns in mothers/caregivers of children with chronic feeding problems. J Pediatr Health Care. 2004 ;18:138– 144.

37.

Townsley R, Robinson C. More than just a health issue: a review of current issues in the care of enterally-fed children living in the community.Health Soc Care Community. 1999 ;7:216– 224.

38.

Wang K-WK, Barnard A. Technology-dependent children and their families: a review. J Adv Nurs. 2004 ;45:36– 46.

39.

Bradley RH, Parette HP, VanBiervliet A. Families of young technology-dependent children and the social worker. Soc Work Health Care. 1995;21:23– 37.

40.

Holden CE, MacDonald A, Ward M, et al. Psychological preparation for nasogastric feeding in children. Br J Nurs. 1997 ;6:376– 385.

41.

Thomlison B, Craig, S. Ineffective parenting. In: Dulmus C, Rapp-Paglicci L, Wodarski J, eds. Handbook of Preventive Interventions for Adults. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2005:327– 359.

42.

Michaelis CA. Identifying obstacles in pediatric home tube feeding [thesis]. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska; 1989.

43.

Gingerich WJ. Developing expert systems. Comput Hum Serv (J Techn Hum Serv). 1990;6:251– 263.

44.

Rubin A, Babbie E. Research Methods for Social Work. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2001.

45.

Thomlison B, Krysik J. Restrictiveness as a placement outcome indicator: a case-level example. Soc Work Res Abstr. 1993 ;29:28– 32.

46.

deLeeuw ED. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties; 1992.

47.

Fox RJ, Crask MR, Kim J. Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opin Q. 1988 ;52:467– 491.

48.

Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001 ;35:1347– 1355.

49.

Craig GM, Scambler G, Spitz L. Why parents of children with neurodevelopment disabilities requiring gastrostomy feeding need more support.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003 ;45:183– 188.

50.

Berezin S, Medow MS, Bernaducci J, Newman LJ. Home teaching of nocturnal nasogastric feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1988 ;12:392– 393.

51.

Huddleston KC, Ferraro AR. Preparing families of children with gastrostomies. Pediatr Nurs. 1991 ;17:153– 158.

52.

Elia M. Home enteral nutrition: general aspects and a comparison between the United States and Britain. Nutrition. 1994 ;10:115– 123.

53.

Marchand V, Baker SS, Baker RD. Enteral nutrition in the pediatric population. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 1998 ; 8:669– 703.

54.

George DE. Home parenteral and enteral nutrition. In: McConnell MS, ed. Guidelines for Pediatric Home Health Care. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2002:118– 123.

55.

Nelson JK, Palumbo PJ, O'Brien PC. Home enteral nutrition: observations of a newly established program. Nutr Clin Pract. 1986 ; 193–199.

56.

McCrae JAD, Hall NH. Current practices for home enteral nutrition.J Am Diet Assoc. 1989;89:233– 240.

57.

Rains BL. The non-hospitalized tube-fed patient. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1981;8:8– 13.

58.

Bull MJ. Interventions for women as family caregivers. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2001;19:125– 142.

59.

Killeen M. The influence of stress and coping on family caregivers' perception of health. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1990 ;30:197– 211.

60.

Petr CG, Murdock B, Chapin R. Home care for children dependent on medical technology: the family perspective. Soc Work Health Care. 1995;21:5– 22.

61.

Fisher L, Weihs KL. Can addressing family relationships improve outcomes in chronic disease? Report of the National Working Group on Family-Based Interventions in Chronic Disease. J Fam Pract. 2000 ;49:561– 566.

62.

Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, King G, Evans J. Family-Centered Service: a conceptual framework and research review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:1– 20.

63.

Melnyk BM, Alpert-Gillis L, Feinstein NF, et al. Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers.Pediatrics. 2004;113:e597– e607.