Abstract
This study estimates individual-firm style loadings for classification of individual securities into growth (glamour) and value groups. Style loadings are similar to betas, measuring the comovement of a firm's return with the return on a particular style index. The study examines this classification by comparing the extent of unrecorded economic assets for growth and value firms. The study also examines the systematic-risk characteristics associated with this classification.
Using Ohlson's (1995) valuation model, this study estimates the persistence of abnormal earnings for individual firms using time-series analysis. Growth firms are shown to have higher levels of abnormal earnings persistence than value firms, probably due to their greater levels of unrecorded economic assets than value firms. Indeed, the study finds that growth firms have greater levels of R&D and advertising intensity than value firms.
The study also shows that growth and value firms differ in their systematic risk. Possibly due to the greater uncertainty associated with unrecorded economic assets, the systematic risks of growth firms are larger than those of value firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.